Give a Gift

Employee Health Care

Why the Health Care Bill May
Eventually Curb Medical Costs

It will take several years to know for sure, but some provisions may really help.

By Martha Lynn Craver, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter

March 25, 2010
Text Size T T
  • Comments
  • Print This Article
  • Order a Reprint
  • Advertisement

Make no mistake: The health care bill’s biggest change will be to extend care to about 32 million Americans who have no insurance now. It will also stop insurers from canceling coverage for many people who get sick or who have exceeded coverage caps. But on the long road to winning passage, the original goal -- slowing the growth of medical costs (bending the cost curve, in Washington parlance) was moved to the backseat.

Still, there are many provisions in the bill that can save in the long term. Most are pilot programs that need to be tested to see if they work -- a process that will take about five years. Other cost cutting moves depend on details that regulators will have to fill in. And some big ones depend on Congress having the political will to follow through. “Most of the steps represent a down payment on delivery system reform. More will need to be done,” says Ken Sperling with Hewitt Associates, a benefits consulting firm. Covering most of the uninsured should reduce cost shifting to private plans but not eliminate it. Private payers currently pay higher costs because hospitals and doctors charge them more to compensate for care that is provided to those without insurance as well as those in Medicare and Medicaid. Families USA recently estimated that families pay about $1,000 more on average each year because of this cost shifting.

Related Links


Obviously, with more of the uninsured covered, this cost shifting should be affected, but given the fact that half of the newly covered will be in Medicaid, cost shifting will still go on, since Medicaid reimbursements are below market. A 2008 actuarial study by Milliman, a consulting and actuarial firm, found that Medicaid reimburses hospitals at an average of 67% of private plan rates and pays doctors at an average of 53%.

Several Medicare pilot projects could bring systemwide reforms to the health care delivery system and yield significant cost savings. The law orders pilot programs in value based hospital purchasing, payment bundling, preventable hospital readmissions and accountable care organizations. If successful, these changes would be expanded to the entire Medicare program and would become mainstream as private payers followed suit. “Medicare is a great laboratory for delivery system innovation,” says Sperling.

The hospital value-based purchasing pilot will launch in fiscal year 2013 and will base Medicare payments to hospitals on quality and outcomes. accountable care organizations focuses on coordinating the overall care delivered to Medicare patients. (Hewitt estimates that these organizations can be 10% to 15% more efficient and deliver better quality.) "Payment bundling" involves paying for services based on an episode of care rather than on fee-for-service. Bundled payments could create more incentives for efficient treatments and could be adjusted based on outcomes, say health care policy experts. "Preventable readmissions" would penalize hospitals if a patient comes back when that could have been avoided. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) expects this to save about $2.1 billion over 10 years.

An independent commission with the job of reining in Medicare cost increases also has promise. The 15-member Independent Medicare Payment Advisory Board will be created in 2014 and will make recommendations to Congress to reduce costs and improve quality for Medicare beneficiaries. When the program’s cost projections exceed certain targets, the board’s proposals will take effect unless Congress passes an alternative that would achieve the same savings. The CBO estimates that this could yield substantial savings of $22 billion over 10 years and $7 billion a year beginning in 2019.

But if history is any guide, getting the board’s recommendations passed could be a tough sell. Earlier efforts by Congress to rein in Medicare reimbursements to physicians, for example, have been deferred year after year. “Politics often trumps policy,” says Sperling.


How will Obama’s heath care bill affect YOUR small business? Find out by clicking here.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.


DISCUSS

Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy

Reader Comments (16)

Posted by: JD at 03/26/2010 12:00:03 PM

These provisions seem to be new ways to add overhead, and the prevented readmission stuff seems like a way to ensure more unnecessary treatment the first time, just like our tort system. I'm starting to get worried by Kiplinger's cheerleading for this bill. I used to appreciate the bipartisanship.

Posted by: Eric at 03/26/2010 03:58:45 PM

The main thing to highlight here is "Obviously, with more of the uninsured covered, this cost shifting should be affected, but given the fact that half of the newly covered will be in Medicaid, cost shifting will still go on, since Medicaid reimbursements are below market." So, who actually provides payments to provider for Medicaid patients... the majority of the insured, the private policy holders... actually we will pay twice - higher premiums and higher taxes. The interesting thing here is the author's take of Pay for Performance - which he dubs "payment bundling". This theory has not been proven as a costs savings, and actually the adverse effect may happen. The only way a provider can make this work is to turn away the un-sick and preventive medicine, and then only work on curable illnesses that will turn good outcomes... and thus care rationing is born....

Posted by: Alan at 03/26/2010 04:48:27 PM

Care rationing may be the only sensible long term solution. Since the average American spends 50% of his lifetime medical expense in his last six months of his life, that six months is the logical place to save money. Our obsession with extending life, without regard to the quality of the extended time, is an obsession we can no longer afford. As a health care professional, I see again and again families that want to "save Grandpa" for another few months, even though Grandpa does not want to save himself. The cost to all taxpayers (these are mostly Medicare expenses) is enormous. Since we cannot count on families to make decisions that make economic sense, and asking doctors to make these decisions on life or death scares the heck out of most of us, the only option is to have defined procedures that require private payment for the "life extension" situations.

Posted by: mike Phipps at 03/26/2010 08:58:16 PM

Well with all due respect which ain't much, you are full of Bull. This Healthcare bill is reducing the amount of coverage and raising the cost of all those presently insured. And raising it to the point you get bad coverage...Like I get this letter once a month generated by some young Pharmacist telling me Generic drug is better for me because it cost less. Well when I take it I feel worse. So all this board approved stuff is bull. A board decided that the world was Flat and not they are going to decide what is good for my health...

Posted by: grab at 03/26/2010 09:23:08 PM

As a health care worker in a hosp. system I can tell you hospitals do most of the items covered in this article. Hospitals try for the best, most cost efficient care they can deliver. A lot of cost still come from procedures that are done so physicians won't be sued. A Medicare advisory board, sounds like "rationing"!! We can't treat every single person no matter what their condition, like they will resume a normal life. Some tough choices will be made. This week we had a 82 yo Mexican whose family brought him from Mexico because he was having chest pains. At our hospital he had a 3-way bypass done paid by emergency Medi-cal. Guess who pays for this care? He was not an illegal, uninsured or any of the other groups we intend to cover. You can not factor these types of patients because we don't know the numbers. Before trying to support Obamacare with the political crap from Washington check out what is happening in the real world!

Posted by: Ali k at 03/27/2010 12:54:30 PM

Good article . Quality reward is in the good direction many readmissiomns. Is preventable with little effort we need. To fill in these cracks that our forgotten heroes have fallen into . Veterans at private hospital hospital don't mind charging for more work since Medicare will pay the bill. Priv INSurance only pays 20 percent plus they get subsidys you've gotta give incentives to med providers to give quality results so patients are better if possible . ObamA is no socialist if you actually read his history and do your homework . They should have done public option like Brits. can anyone call those imperialists socialists? Well I think all this has made a past apathetic young persons interested in policy and learning about our gov and participating in our democracy. I'm sure other young people are equally as moved regardless wfich side your on...

Posted by: HS at 03/27/2010 01:17:08 PM

I still don't get it. Medicaid reimbursements are below market. If I bring cash to the hospital, I still have to pay full price, no discount. The hospital gets its money right away, there is no paperwork, there are no discussions, just a cash transaction. For that, my advantage is to pay full price, no discount. If I come to the table with private insurance or Medicaid, I pay below market prices, the hospital has to fill out enormous amounts of paperwork and it may take several months for them to get their money. What is wrong with this picture? I still say the whole "health care reform" things was a misnomer. It seemed to be mostly about insurance. I still think if you fix healthcare, then insurance will naturally follow along with it.

Posted by: Tom at 03/27/2010 05:31:43 PM

Give me a break! Name ONE federal entitlement that's operating in the black. Just ONE! I've just cancelled my subscription to Kiplinger. And I'm certain you won't post this comment.

Posted by: gj at 03/28/2010 08:32:39 AM

Why not talk about some of the very good the reasons this bill will not reverse health care spending at the same time you are presenting the other view. For example this bill will add in the IRS alone 16,000 jobs...so they can enforce the bill's provisions on taxpayers. How about doing a story on how this bill will add to an already bloated bureaucracy--the IRS being just one of several agencies to add jobs. Oh,then there are state governments that no doubt will have to add jobs. There is plenty of story here IF you want to look. I agree with the previous comment--this article is disappointing.

Posted by: RG at 03/28/2010 12:37:06 PM

So there is great hope in an "independent commission." Who are they independent from - the voters? This is another method that the petty dictators that are running our lives until next November have devised to impose their will upon us. They must be serving Kool Aid in the water coolers at Kiplingers.

Posted by: Frank at 03/28/2010 01:47:55 PM

The last sentence truly sums it all up. "Politics often trumps policy "is, of course, true. So why bring this entire matter to the political arena? Do you really believe these government bureaucrats will affect efficiencies better than the free market? Do you really believe that reducing reimbursements to doctors and hospitals will do anything other than diminish capital, the quantity and quality of providers, and, thus, our care? This article belies a shocking ignorance of economics.

Posted by: Rudy at 03/28/2010 11:52:43 PM

What do you mean "starting to" get worried by Kiplinger's cheerleading. Nothing in this article suggests that Medicare will ever get cheaper based on what is in the current bill. Only if certain things happen later incuding the world is a perfect place. This is pure socialist bung. Regards,

Posted by: LT at 03/29/2010 03:36:37 PM

Wouldn't it make a lot more sense to try out these pilot "cost-cutting" projects on a small sample, say within a single state, before roping in an entire nation of 300 million people? You don't have to run detailed numbers to see the obvious - adding 30+ million people to the government dole has no possible chance of saving money. It will, however, take trillions of dollars out of the productive sector where it generates wealth every time it moves, and put them into a fiscal black hole run by incompetent managers, i.e. the feds. Sounds like a winner.

Posted by: Chris at 04/01/2010 11:44:03 AM

Why do all of the cool cost-saving measures start in several years? That makes no sense... except politically.

Posted by: Chris C at 04/06/2010 02:38:55 PM

What has happened to this country? All these posters who have insurance feel perfectly free to condemn people who can't get it in this rigged, ultra expensive system to just go somewhere and die from lack of healthcare or go broke and sell their jhouses. There was atime you'd be embarrassed to be such a huge selfish pig. When did americans decide that businesses were more important than American's? It's disgusting. Medicaid operates with lower costs, lower adminstrative costs than anything in the private sector and they cover everyone. Group employee plans are exactly the type of thing we are trying to secure for everyone. Wow, people who are covered ( or think they are they haven't been dropped yet) and people who are covered because they work in hospitals think it's a bad idea to cover everyone. Well, I can tell you people who want their children to continue to live and want to have their bsuiness not go under to pay their huge premiums are for these reforms. Sorry, we decided to actually be fair about things and worry about everyone, not just you. . .

Posted by: martin at 04/07/2010 10:50:37 PM

Nearly all of you have been lied and you are just to stupid to recognize or admit it. The government has been the single greatest force of good for all of us for our entire lives. City, State, and Federal regulations ensure that the water we drink out of our faucets will not kill us. Government enforced building codes are the reason your house does not burn down when there's an electrical short. The official atomic clock absolutely everyone sets their watch to is kept by the naval observatory. That means you couldn't even tell the time of day without the government you morons. Oh, and by the way, the internet we're all using right now; not only is it the single greatest generator of economic activity in the history of mankind, but it began as a government program. Truth is, that free market you really don't understand ran what was our health care system into the ground. The old system only worked so long as you stayed healthy - gee what a deal!! States like Massachusetts and Hawaii have tried and tested many of the reforms now going national. Guess what?! Government can run health care better than private enterprise. Deal with it and shut up.



Featured Videos From Kiplinger





Connect With Kiplinger

E-mail Updates: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox.

email-sign-up

facebook
twitter
RSS