Dollar's Fall Is Scary but Not a Reason to Panic
The dollar will go lower before rebounding, but rebound it will. The only question is -- when?
By Andrew C. Schneider, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter
March 12, 2008
Advertisement
The dollar will continue to test new depths this year. It's likely to reach a new low point as a freely traded currency, beating its previous post-Bretton Woods nadir set in October 1978. Individual exchange rates will provide eye-catching markers along the way, with the euro climbing past $1.60 and the yen rising to its highest level against the dollar since 1995.
A combination of factors is continuing to drive investors away from the greenback. First and foremost is the steady drumbeat of bad news about the U.S. economy: the ongoing housing and credit crunches, poor auto sales, weak job growth. Each fresh signal that the U.S. might be entering a recession, or is already in one, prompts traders to seek healthier alternatives than greenbacks.
Increasingly, institutional investors are putting their money into oil, precious metals, iron ore, coffee and grain in search of higher returns. That's keeping prices high, and adding to inflationary pressures, even as slower global growth suggests demand for commodities should be moderating. "Historically, investors, particularly institutional investors, are reluctant to hold commodities because they don't pay interest," says Benn Steil, director of international economics at the Council on Foreign Relations. "Now you have investors saying, 'If I hold my wealth in dollars, I'm going to get a negative return. This is a really bad deal.'"
But the greenback won't collapse, and eventually it will rebound. The dominant position of large global investors in the foreign exchange markets, particularly central banks, acts as a significant bulwark against the panic selling that would signify a rout. Such large holders of dollars might want to diversify, but because the foreign exchange markets can handle only so many trades at one time, they can't afford to be seen as dumping their greenbacks. "If they sell even part of their holdings, the rest of their holdings would crater," says Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com.
Several other factors weigh in favor of a dollar turnaround. One is that the dollar's persistent weakness will continue to make U.S. exports more competitive. At the same time, weaker U.S. growth will reduce demand for imports, accelerating the reduction in the trade deficit that began in 2007. The rapid growth of the trade deficit in recent years was one of the main reasons investors began turning away from the dollar in the first place.
It's also worth noting that the British pound and the Canadian dollar have both retreated against the greenback in recent months as the Bank of England and Bank of Canada cut interest rates to respond to economic slowdowns of their own. The European Central Bank (ECB), by contrast, retains a bias toward fighting inflation over promoting growth and remains extremely focused on the effects of high commodity prices. One major reason the euro has continued setting new record highs against the U.S. dollar is that the ECB has held rates neutral, even hinted at rate hikes, while the Federal Reserve trimmed rates.
Investor confidence in the dollar is a proxy for confidence in the U.S. economy as a whole, and the U.S.' economic problems, however worrisome, are cyclical rather than structural. As the U.S. starts to recover in the latter half of this year, investors will come trickling back. Meanwhile, growth in the euro zone itself will continue to slow. By year end, currency traders will start to take account of the relative strengths of the two economies, and the euro will start to retreat, leveling off close to $1.40.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.


Reader Comments (8)
Posted by: Ivo Cerckel at 03/11/2008 08:14:18 PM
How can the greenback rebound in an environment where the dollar-regime is being replaced by Freegold, thereby making gold the natural vehicle to store one's wealth in? In an environment where Finance chiefs are more gloomy? In an environment like the one on Tuesday where, alarmed by the stress in the safest parts of the US mortgage-backed securities market, the Federal Reserve had to announce a new $200bn plan to boost liquidity at troubled financial companies? You are apparently ignorant of the fact that Iran is issuing invoices in dollars for its oil and agreeing with clients that the letters of credit and other means of payment will have a non-dollar basis. Just like CNN hasn’t heard of the Bahrain Gulf Arab policymakers and Chambers of Commerce March 23-24 Conference on inflation where the Gulf currencies will be unpegged from the greenback. (4) Fortunately, the repercussions of the Spitzer-case will make it sure that financial Armageddon is now even more certain than before. The bank problems in the US of A will now certainly never be solved. OPEC must thus call extraordinary meeting now! Now for March 25, the day after the March 23-24 Conference on inflation where Gulf countries will unpeg their currencies from the greenback. And on March 25, OPEC must decide to price oil in another currency than the greenback.
Posted by: Matt Miller at 03/12/2008 09:30:06 PM
Mr. Cerckel - How can you ignore the correcting tendencies of free market capitalism? I happen to agree with Mr. Schneider's outlook, although it may take longer than one year for the dollar to start strengthening again. The $200 billion cash infusion will certainly weaken the dollar in the short term, but will help stabilize the US economy in the long term. How? By smoothing the bumpy economy. As far as the Spitzer-case is concerned, it couldn't be better for the economy. He was a scam artist that used his bully pulpit to abuse honest, free market, Wall Street types. The key word there is "was". So Ivo, I suggest you go back to school and take a basic macro economics course. While you're there, do not impose your doom and gloom on the student body.
Posted by: Ray Murray at 03/13/2008 08:00:02 AM
Mr. Miller! I want you to consider Mr. Cerckel's comments rather than berating him. What are the ramifications of the Gulf States unpegging the US Greenback? I don't believe his comment that the bank problems in the USA will "never" be solved. As more and more US banks seek out foreign capital to sustain their profolios, these global financial institutions will most likely impose a more stricter discipline on the US banks, and as a result, may help solve part of the US financial woes. As we saw with the Savings & Loan Crisis of 1989-90 where the gov't. had to prop up that sector with approx. $92 Billion, it did sort itself out, more or less. The question is: is there a global "crisis of confidence" in the US economy? And if so, how does our nation extricate ourselves? Mr. Cerckel is right on about CNN. We're getting a lot of "fluff" for news from all the US media. We need to know more about significant economic activity and events around the world that affect our economy and our investors.This 2 year political campaign has our media and public blinded. And please don't give us the "Invisible Hand Theory" of John Locke's Wealth of Nations spiel that will somehow miraculously "smooth out the bumps" in the economy.
Posted by: profluigi at 03/13/2008 08:23:21 AM
Mr. Schneider overlooks the root of the problem--the profligate ways of the US gov't and the US consumer. The rest of the world has subsidized our unbridled, insane waste of nonrenewable resources, and permitted us to borrow far beyond our means and those of our great-grandchildren to finance our imperialist wars and gobal bullying. To say our economic problems are non-structural is to ignore reality to the point of psychosis (or Dick Cheney). We have to stop playing world storm trooper; we have to stop spending money we don't have; we have to start charity at home, taking care of our poor and our uneducated; we have to let our dear allies see to their own defense and get our troops home now from everywhere; we have to go back to our roots. If we don't we go the way of Imperial Rome. And none of Sens. McCain, Obama or Clinton have said word bleeping one that makes me think they understand any of this.
Posted by: Robert J. Koenig at 03/13/2008 08:37:43 AM
Andrew C. Schneider overlooks Gresham’s Law: “bad money forces out good”. The dollar’s goose is cooked. Mr. Schneider, with support from other misguided pundits (e.g. Moody’s Mark Zandi) then goes on to say that the massive overseas holdings of dollars [by sovereign wealth funds and overseas corporations] “acts as a bulwark against the dollars collapse” [sic]. That is rubbish: when the holders of dollars start to earnestly unload, the dollar will decline another 50% - in other words to about €1 = $3. At the end of day, it is the European Central Bank and European Politicians which ultimately hold the keys to the dollar’s value. If the ECB loses it resolve, and copies George Bush by purposefully debasing the Euro; or if the Euro-block countries start a multi-trillion Euro war in some remote part of the globe: then the dollar will rebound against the Euro. But all that will mean is that both currencies will have then “clipped their coins”. What does the inevitable and incipient decline of the dollar really mean? It could mean there is tremendous value to be found in the stock of corporations which are well capitalized, have low debt levels and talented employees, actually make something, and can pay dividends from real cash earnings. Where am I investing my money? I am trying to corner the wind market. I figure that if I can organize an OPEC-like monopoly on wind, I can strangle the Nevada wind-mill operators – which is where I write from.
Posted by: profluigi at 03/13/2008 04:39:30 PM
The following form the AP wires, discussing Sec'y Paulson's working group on mortgage defaults: "The report said various government bodies had worked on the recommendations for more seven months and that Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke had "huddled" for half a day early this month to review the details." With these geniuses in charge, Heaven help us! It took seven months for them to discover what everyone knew--the securitized mortgage portfolios were junk from junksville, that every interest rate cut killed the dollar and boosted oil futures, that ethanol was a giveaway to the farm lobby that would kill the working stiff consumer if gasoline prices didn't. What a squadron of buffoons!!
Posted by: Jack R Savage at 03/14/2008 12:51:37 AM
It's people like Bush, Cheney, Kennedy and others that have kept us living in a free society during the past few years. You complain about the oil company's making too much money but you don't have a clue of what it takes to get gasoline into the tank of your car.
Posted by: Frank Hefferen at 03/15/2008 11:19:16 PM
The entire global economy hinges around the U.S. consumer. That's a fact. No matter what happens America will emerge better off than everybody else.