Detroit Facing Dramatic Downsizing
Within the next couple of years, 600,000 more jobs will disappear in the U.S. auto and related industries.
By Jim Ostroff, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter
December 3, 2008
Advertisement
U.S. automakers are too big to fail, but they’re also too big to succeed in their current form. So Congress will reluctantly help, but the aid will come at a cost to Detroit in the form of scorched-earth downsizing and restructuring.
Figure on around 60,000 blue-collar jobs disappearing a year from now -- a 25% cut, on average -- at General Motors (GM), Ford and Chrysler, which will reduce the car companies’ workforce to 180,000 or less in coming years. The number of U.S. auto assembly plants in the Midwest will drop from 53 to around 36.
The net effect on the U.S. auto industry: 600,000 jobs lost, if you include the impact on suppliers, service providers and businesses in towns that rely on the Detroit Three. That’s a body blow to an economy already in recession and a devastated industry. Overall sales for Detroit automakers plunged 40.2% in November compared with a year ago: Chrysler, down by 47%; Ford, a 33% drop; and GM, a 41% decline.
The United Auto Workers union will have to swallow big cuts in pay and benefits, with more workers shunted to the tiered system created in 2007. That means wages and benefits totaling $25 an hour, which is what Toyota and Honda pay U.S. workers, rather than the $75 an hour most union workers get now. And there’ll be no more contracts that pay idled autoworkers 95% of wages plus health and pension benefits, which are already costing Detroit car companies around $330 million a year.
Detroit will have to be weaned off incentive cash back and 0% financing. Those deals knocked $10 billion from GM's earning every year they were available and billions from the earnings of GM’s American-based rivals.
U.S. automakers will downsize their brands, too, to weed out relatively weak-selling models, gaining cost efficiencies that accrue with large-volume production. "For GM, that means getting rid of anything outside of Chevrolet and Cadillac, such as Buick and Pontiac," says Erich Merkle, an auto industry analyst with Crowe Horwath, a consulting firm.
Ford may well look to fold its tent on the Mercury brand, focusing on Lincoln. There's not much Chrysler can do, since its Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep brands have all taken a wallop in the market and are bleeding away their share of sales, Merkle says.
Chrysler is likely to pull through the crisis, but its long-term prognosis is poor. Without the leverage of global operations to drive down the cost of parts and just a 10% share of the U.S. market for new-car sales, Chrysler is at a cost disadvantage that makes it hard to compete with domestic and foreign rivals.
Cerberus Capital will buff up Chrysler and sell Jeep and other brands piecemeal. "Chrysler will use the federal loan to try to make itself a little healthier for a sale or a partner in the interim, but there's no way that Chrysler can survive on its own in the U.S. because the volume sales are just not there anymore," says Aaron Bragman, an auto analyst with IHS Global Insight, a business consultancy.
There’ll be big changes, too, in the kinds and sizes of car Detroit produces. GM will put the Chevy Volt’s plug-in hybrid technology in many more models within five years. GM will focus on its core brands Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac. The company will sell Saab, shrink Pontiac to a niche brand and consider selling or closing Saturn. It also plans to trim its U.S. dealerships from today’s 6,450 to about 4,700.
Also expect a turbocharged, fuel efficient Chevy Cruze in two years. Ford will roll out the hybrid Fusion, which is touted as more efficient than the Toyota Camry, and in 2010 will unveil a Fiesta that gets 40 miles per gallon on the highway. Chrysler will sell a high-mileage subcompact from Nissan in 2010, but it has nothing else in the works -- one reason the firm may be sold off.
Congress can’t actually rescue automakers headed for bankruptcy court, truth be told. Auto executives, lawmakers and investors know that this strategy would at best buy Detroit a few weeks of extra time. And probably nothing good would happen during that period. Raising billions of dollars in necessary debtor-in-possession financing from banks and investment houses is unlikely in today’s wretched markets. And selling autos to spooked consumers would be extremely tough, since most would-be buyers are already wondering whether these companies will even be around long enough to honor auto leases, let alone to back car purchase warrantees.
If a car company were to go belly-up, it would turn into a de facto liquidation, says Bragman. "There would be a quick cascading effect that would see that bankrupt automaker's suppliers fail, and since Toyota, Honda and others rely on many of the same suppliers, most of the industry would have to shut down production for months," he adds.
Auto executives will be back in Washington this week to plead their case for billions of dollars in loan guarantees as UAW leaders meet behind closed doors to consider new concessions. The next few months for the U.S. auto industry will probably be the most difficult in decades, but the American automaker is not at death’s door.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.


Reader Comments (15)
Posted by: Joe Honick at 12/03/2008 11:00:49 AM
I looked fruitlessly to find what the high-powered executive suites would have to do as their share of all this takedown effort. After all, despite all the cited costs for workers of all kinds, they did not make the marketing decisions that put the American auto industry miles behind foreign competitors. Considering what it took to get the execs' attention about flagrant use of jets etc. please cite what their penalties will be in your scenario.
Posted by: HJP at 12/03/2008 11:26:13 AM
A bankrupt auto company is not viable. Consumers would not spend tens of thousands of dollars on a vehicle with unknown support (warranty, parts and service) and literally no resale value. If congress agrees to a bailout, there must be enough to see these companies through the recession and the complete restructuring of the business model or tens of billions of more tax payers money will be wasted.
Posted by: C. Lambeth at 12/03/2008 11:27:24 AM
US automakers have dug their own grave. How long will we keep these wheezing dinosaurs on life support? Let them fail. It is inevitable, and sooner is better than later for everyone involved. Then we can get on with more important (and more efficient) business. It's only a matter of how long we want to drag out the pain. Consumers can help usher the Detroit 3 to the door by simply refusing to buy their junkyard fodder no matter how hard they try and polish their shoddy vehicles.
Posted by: Bo Hardy at 12/03/2008 02:35:02 PM
I just read that the average UAW worker is being paid $75/hour. If that is true I am disgusted at the greedy UWA workers and the weak CEO's at the big three for allowing that to happen. They are making $154,000 per year. No wonder the big three are going down. Go bankrupt and renegotiate!
Posted by: Roy Schauffele at 12/03/2008 03:20:15 PM
This country began to go to hell in a hand basket when it started to reward failure and punish success. Isn't it about time that the Feds stopped this lunacy. let the big 3 become a phoenix.
Posted by: Blair at 12/03/2008 04:56:20 PM
$75 is only the average direct wage cost. If you add in pension costs and health care benefits it's a staggering $175 per hour. Outrageous! No wonder these guy's are failing. The UAW strangled the golden goose, which is as now dead as a door nail. The auto workers are now going to either lose their jobs, or go back to a reasonable wage.
Posted by: Keith at 12/03/2008 06:04:14 PM
Lambeth: Every auto maker is in trouble, due to the credit crunch caused by the mortgage funny business. Every country is working on the same plans to rescue their home automakers. If those other automakers get the help they need for the short term, and the American ones don't, I guarantee you there will be thousands of people more skilled than you out of work and gunning for your job. Good luck with that.
Posted by: peteMT at 12/03/2008 06:21:51 PM
Look, people. The quality of Detroit's vehicles is improving. Do some research. The renegotiated UAW contract with lower pay and benefits ("competitive") won't kick in until 2010. And, it takes YEARS to R&D, design, and retool for a new model. Even though superior vehicles are sold by Ford and GM overseas, they don't meet US crash test and emissions standards (diesels!) so thanks to government regulations can't be sold here. Will any of you blame the government for this fact? If the loans are approved - and I approve the idea - at the very least, the automakers should be forced to rescind and retroactively reclaim golden parachutes and retirement options for the short-sighted and arrogant management that contributed to this problem. Better cars are coming - and some are here - from Detroit, but even they couldn't forecast 40-50% sales drops. Finally, when we have another global conflict, do you suppose China and Mexico will be willing to retool to produce what the US needs if we have no more heavy industry in the form of domestic automakers?
Posted by: Jim Ostroff at 12/03/2008 07:28:38 PM
Kiplinger never takes sides on issues. We only say and forecast what is likely to happen. We do not explore what, if any moral hazards or penalties corporate executives should or shouldn't face as a consequence of their actions. This is for lawmakers and these executives themselves to decide. Time and again we have seen that consumers and markets are the arbiters. Their judgment often is harsh--and final. We stand by our analysis that the failure of Detroit's three automakers would have a swift, devastating effect on the U.S. economy. Around 3 million workers would stand to lose their jobs within one year. Around 80% of these people do not work for the automakers. They're employed by parts suppliers, metal, aluminum and plastics manufacturers, as well as neighborhood groceries, card shops, gas service stations, barber shops, etc., that rely on spending by auto industry workers and their suppliers. No matter their personal feelings about the one-time Big Three, lawmakers are aware that "just saying no" to loan guarantees will hurt Main Street businesses nationwide and cause many small ones to fail.
Posted by: Buy Foreign Cars at 12/03/2008 08:00:27 PM
The American automakers should all file for bankruptcy. They don't deserve to be in business. Even WITH a government bailout, jobs will still be lost so why waste taxpayer money on companies that have inferior products and poor management. The notion that people won't buy from a bankrupt car company is ludicrous because America is finally waking up and realizing that gas-guzzling inferior American cars are not worth buying anyway. Just check out Consumer Report ratings for any year and the top rated cars are all foreign. I love America but I love my fuel efficient, reliable Honda even more !!
Posted by: MB at 12/03/2008 08:49:08 PM
Management and unions seem agreeable to help solve this dilemma. Government regulation is the third leg of the stool. It's time for congress to ante their stake. We may not need a "loan/bailout" if congress eliminates auto industry regulation that they cannot prove has benefited the people. Throwing billions at this problem won't solve it. Shame on you congress.
Posted by: TRM at 12/03/2008 09:49:08 PM
$75/hour is not the wage, it is an estimated figure that includes healthcare, retirement, and other benifits. The $75 number, I think, is also including 'legacy costs' for already retired workers (which outnumber the workers 2/1). The actual wage for the workers is usually in the low to mid 20's, and the new contract from 2007 has new employees being paid $14 and hour with no pension. The big drain on the automakers comes from paying for benifit packages which its competitors do not. In Japan, these programs are already nationalized. Further, the Japanese auto companies recieve government support at home, and have recieved billions in gifts and tax incentives from the US as well. Free trade is a myth...
Posted by: Frank Hefferen at 12/03/2008 10:16:11 PM
Uneducated union line workers are making a 6 figure compensation package. Nuff said, it won't work for the long haul. Unions have taken America hostage and have caused more damage to America than terrorists could ever dream of.
Posted by: WRW at 12/04/2008 12:31:50 AM
I am a recent GM retiree. The $75 per hour figure includes benefits, health care, pension, vacation, employee discounts, payroll taxes, unemployment tax and many other indirect costs. The assembly worker building the cars and trucks makes $27 per hour for the actual paycheck. Even that may seem high to some but if you work in an assembly plant and endure the wear and tear on your body, then you realize it really isn't too much. And then compared to the upper management and their millions in pay with bonuses, stock options and pensions that are still in the millions. Sorry, the worker isn't the culprit here. Oh, and thanks for buying General Motors vehicles.
Posted by: JAB at 12/07/2008 07:29:23 AM
My father bought Plymouth's for years and was happy with them. Then something went wrong, we bought a 76 Volare and the fenders rusted through, and it has been downhill from there. I just traded my 2000 Grand Caravan. The van was rusting through and it constantly threw its serpentine belt. The Chrysler dealer told me not to drive it through puddles. I asked him how if I was driving uphill with rain runing across the road, how I was supossed to avoid running through the puddle. He GRINNED!!! I asked if that meant I should not drive the van in the rain. He GRINNED!!! To add insult to injury, when I went to his lot to pick it up, they had parked it so I had to go through a deep puddle to drive it out. So much for the old axiom "Chrysler care in engineering." I am tired of rusting, mechancial problem prone American cars. My 96 Prizm cost $6K and has 150,000 plus on it. Until this year no problems. I replaced the van with a Honda and it will take the big three years to get my confidence back. When they talk layoff's let them cut executives or executive pay in proportion to the number of hard working blue collars they layoff.