Business Resource Center
Subscribe

KIPLINGER FORECASTS

Home > Economic Outlook, Finance
 
 

EXECUTIVE POLL

Bernard Madoff, convicted of running an $65 billion Ponzi scheme, was sentenced to 150 years in jail. What’s your take on his punishment?

Too heavy. There’s no point having him die in jail.
About right.
Not nearly heavy enough.
Not sure
 
   view results
Compare Price Quotes 100+ Services
ADVERTISEMENT
 
 

OUR PREMIUM CONTENT


The Kiplinger Letter
 
 
 

CURRENT LETTER

 
The Kiplinger Washington Editors
July 2, 2009
 

Overhauling
Financial Regs

By year-end or so, Congress will give the nod to a major rewriting of the nation's financial regulatory system. This week’s Kiplinger Letter explores whether the package will do more harm than good and what lawmakers are likely to include.
 
CORRECTIONS

TRY THE LETTER:

Subscribe
| See Sample
 
YOUR FEEDBACK
SUBSCRIBERLOG: Got a topic you'd like to discuss? Or a problem or question? Please join our exclusive forum for Letter subscribers only.
 
ASK US: A Kiplinger Letter editor will promptly answer subscriber questions.
 
 
OPEN FORUM: Share your insights and analysis with other visitors.
 
I just attended a franchise seminar. The speaker represents a few hundred franchises that (he says) are hand picked. He has the prospect (aka victim?) answer some questions about themselves then he makes recomendations - based on your personality, capital situation, etc.. If you pick a franchise, then he does some due dilligence for you. If you both decide it's a good idea, he helps you get started. He says he offers this service free of charge, which means he gets a commission if he's able to sell you a franchise. Has anyone done this? Successfully? Unsuccessfully?
-- fender
 

State Finances: Budget Pressures Will Crimp Spending

Hard times for state governments will slow the economic recovery nationwide.
 
 

Many states are about to go into belt-tightening mode, cutting spending and searching for new revenue to deal with a bleak budget outlook that's likely to last two to three years. Half the states are grappling with shortfalls, and most of the remaining states have little room to maneuver financially. The combined shortfall is $16 billion this year, with a projected $32 billion in the next fiscal year, which for states starts July 1.

State budgets are being hurt by the soft economy, which brings down individual and corporate income tax receipts, consumer confidence and purchasing. They're also grappling with rising energy and health care costs, the subprime mortgage fallout, declining home sales and home construction and larger social welfare spending.

The state problem will make the national economy worse because states are big spenders. Their outlays total about $1.8 trillion a year, or about 13% of gross domestic product. Over the past few years, they have kept spending high and fueled regional growth, drawing on rainy-day funds and other slight changes in targeted revenue raising policies to comply with laws requiring balanced budgets.

But that's changing, and tighter spending plans and tax changes will be a weight on a national economic recovery. Plus looming on the horizon is a major state worker pension and retiree health care crisis, with governors and lawmakers having to scramble to shore up underfunded accounts as more aging state workers retire.

The gaps between revenue and spending and the need to balance books will spur heavier competition for resources for outsourced contract work, such as for accounting services and park maintenance, surface transportation contracts, car and truck maintenance, school construction and repairs, building construction and inspection and, in some cases, funds for state-run and privately run prisons.

Hardest hit next year: California, which will account for fully half of the national shortfall. Look for Sacramento to boost the sales tax from 6% to 7%, suspend several tax deductions available to businesses and tap hundreds of millions of dollars set aside for public transit.

Arizona, Florida, Hawaii, Michigan, New Jersey and Nevada also face lean times. New Jersey will cut its workforce and probably reduce property tax rebates. Michigan will close 20 state parks, putting concessionaires out of business, hike various licensing fees and cancel scientific research programs. Hawaii will delay work on a large backlog of school repair projects. Nevada will brace for across-the-board budget cuts, with an exemption for K-12 education.

Other states will also lay off workers, limit aid to local communities, slash budgets for state colleges and delay or nix road and bridge work. And expect states to increasingly lean on private-public partnerships to save money on everything from accounting services to road maintenance.

Few states will follow California in raising taxes in an election year. New York, for example, defeated a proposal to increase taxes on millionaires. And earlier proposals in many states to begin imposing sales taxes on more service industry companies are going nowhere. Still, several states will look at raising some targeted taxes, such as on alcohol and tobacco. Massachusetts is considering an additional $1 per pack sales tax on cigarettes, but the legislature will nix less popular ideas for across-the-board sales tax increases.

There are some bright spots: Texas, Arkansas, Kansas, Nebraska and Oklahoma -- with their wealth of agriculture and energy production -- are thriving. Oklahoma will spend $100 million next year to refurbish its schools. Arkansas' severance tax on natural gas production in the state will help keep its budget in the black.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

READER COMMENTS

Post a comment
 | 
Read all comments (3)


POSTED BY: So What (June 16, 2008 09:52 AM)
The biggest problem with Calfifornia Gov is, it has too much money.

POSTED BY: Joe Honick (June 16, 2008 03:35 PM)
One question no one seems to have raised that will affect all state budgets: if the housing crisis and foreclosures are depressing sales prices, should that not also depress assessments for real estate taxes, and therefore the taxes themselves? Just wondering.

POSTED BY: Fed Up (June 17, 2008 01:09 PM)
The 800 lb gorilla of state budget problems is civil servant pay, pensions, current and retiree health care. Private sector workers (if they're lucky) have 401Ks, not pensions, and almost NOBODY in the private sector get the free (or near free) retiree health care, payout for unused sick days, pensions based on overtime, and on and on and on. Oh, and the greed ........ they still want more & more & more, and scream bloody murder at supposed "givebacks" that realistically have no meaningful value. Look at New Jersey. They just pasted a bunch of bills to save $300 Million (cumulatively, not annually) over 20 years, and the way the civil servants protested, you'd think their legs were being cut off. Guess what, it ONLY impacted new employees, which means NJ will actually reduce expenses by $ZERO until 20 years from now. And, putting the $300 in proper context, NJ owes $96 BILLION in underfunded civil servant pension and retiree health care benefits. The interest carrying charge alone (at say 5%) is almost $5 Billion (and thats ANNUALLY, not cumulative). NJ and all other States need to SERIOUSLY address these overly generous pay, pensions and benefits or our taxes will go for nothing but supporting the greedy civil servants while everyone else suffers. NJ needs to cumulatively reduce that $96 BILLION (by outright reductions to pensions and elimination of almost all retiree medical care for CURRENT employees) by $50-$75 BILLION (not the token $300 Million ... which probably had the union leaders laughing privately that they succeeded in suckering the taxpayers AGAIN). Civil servants are the energizer bunnies of greed and the self-serving, vote-selling, contribution-soliciting, politicians are their enablers.

SAVE, SHARE & DISCUSS:    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   
ADD HEADLINES: