Mexico's Drug Woes a Mounting Threat to Commerce

The U.S.-Mexico border is seeing increased drug trafficking and related violence, spelling a bleak future for border cities and businesses.

By Andrew C. Schneider, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter

May 27, 2008
Text Size T T

Advertisement

A failed state on the U.S. border? It's a growing possibility. Mexican President Felipe Calderón's campaign against the drug cartels is getting increasingly deadly, with the gangs killing federal officials at will, almost certainly with inside help. The latest assassinated, Edgar Millán Gómez, was Mexico's counterpart to the U.S.' FBI director.

The strength and wealth of drug cartels are fueling corruption in Mexico, and there's clearly a growing danger that the rule of law will break down completely. The situation is analogous to that of Colombia in the 1980s, but on a far larger scale and with far more serious potential consequences for the U.S. Mexico has a population more than twice as large as Colombia's. Its economy is the 14th-largest in the world and represents the U.S.' second-largest export market. And unlike Colombia, it shares a 1952-mile border with the U.S.

The cartels are operating against the Mexican authorities from the U.S. side of the border. They're sending money, guns and chemicals for making drugs southward, while shipping methamphetamines, cocaine, heroin and marijuana northward, putting U.S. towns and ranches from Texas to California on the front lines. The violence encompasses Mexico's maquiladora belt that produces goods for U.S. firms before shipping them north for sale. Moreover, the drug battles add extra fire to the immigration debate, with threatened communities demanding the U.S. fence off the border.

The huge resources the cartels can call on enable them to bribe government officials at all levels -- soldiers included, as evidenced by the emergence of Los Zetas, a cartel made up of Mexican Army deserters. Those officials they can't bribe, they can kill. Faced with a choice between being bought and being shot, many officials are caving. George Friedman, founder and CEO of private intelligence firm Stratfor, illustrates the problem in a recent article: "Government officials, seeing the futility of resistance, effectively become tools of the cartels. The government thus becomes both an arena for competition among the cartels and an instrument used by one cartel against another."

Millán's murder on May 8 capped a week in which six senior Mexican police officials were killed, including the federal police's director of organized crime investigations. Drug cartel hits on police officers are far from rare in Mexico, but up to now, most of those targeted have been at the state and local levels. Such attacks were concentrated near the U.S.-Mexican border, where the Mexican army and federal police are now heavily deployed as part of the Calderón government's crackdown. But the most recent hits have taken place in Mexico City itself. That may force the Mexican government to spread out its troops further to protect the capital, diluting its efforts farther north. Moreover, the shootings come at a time when violence between rival cartels is escalating, taxing government forces even more.

President Bush's proposed aid may not be nearly enough. Bush is asking Congress to appropriate an additional $1.4 billion for Mexico in 2008 and 2009. The request, part of a joint U.S.-Mexican strategy known as the Mérida Initiative, would purchase advanced equipment for the Mexican army, navy and federal police, including helicopters, surveillance planes, night vision gear, software and forensic and customs inspection equipment. It also would pay for more law enforcement training groups, helping to vet recruits and train them to better investigate organized crime. And it would fund needed soft power initiatives, such as helping enact a major overall of the justice system just passed by the Mexican Congress.

Capitol Hill will approve the aid package, but the funds pale in comparison to those available to the cartels. Mexico's drug trade with the U.S. amounts to hundreds of billions of dollars per year. That's a situation unlikely to change as long as demand for illegal drugs remains high in the U.S.

Retired U.S. Army Gen. Barry McCaffrey, director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy under President Clinton, notes one positive in the drug battles: Cartels are starting to feel more pressure from Mexico's federal police, as evidenced by their return attacks. Previously, only the Mexican Army, which is partnered with the federals in the counter-narcotics campaign, was viewed as both strong enough and clean enough to have a big impact on the cartels. Still, the outcome remains very much in doubt. "If Mexico can't do this and ends up in the hands of a narco state, we are really in trouble," says McCaffrey.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

Discuss

Reader Comments (7)

Posted by: Bernardo Mendez Lugo at 05/26/2008 09:59:02 PM

Reporter Andrew C. Schneider does a comparison of Mexico with Colombia saying situation today in the US-Mexican border drug trafficking violence is analogous to Colombia in the eighties. In my own view and historical analysis of both cases -Colombia and Mexico- the facts and power of drug lords are very different. He should read some of the works of Mexican UNAM academic researcher Dr Luis Astorga (google him)who has done exhaustive investigations to understand the differences among Colombia and Mexico. Mr Schneider idea of failed state in the US Mexico border is far from reality as well as the idea of "narco state". I advise him to do better research and speak to leading Mexican and Colombian social scientists before he does statements that seem to be very appealing to journalists and even some politicians in US and Mexico.

Posted by: Louis Deugenio at 05/27/2008 03:16:18 PM

Why not invest the $1.4 billion for the border fence. That would eventually stop the easy access to the U. S. dollars funding these cartels. It seems to me that our legislators are not qualified to be in their positions when they can not make easy positive decisions. They are the ones that are making our country and citizens vulnerable to the cartels and other terrorists.

Posted by: NorCal 17 at 05/27/2008 11:28:07 PM

It is a sad state when a country can not control its worst people. The USA should be thinking about sending the CIA/FBI in to take control of this mess. We can also set the Mexican Government up to look like they were victorious in the fight on these scumbags.

Posted by: gĺrcho at 05/28/2008 11:24:40 AM

anyone who thinks that a fence will do anything except get somebody's brother a kushy gov't contract is a fool who has no grasp of history or present day reality. anyone who thinks that the US can somehow "go down to mexico and clean up the scum bags" is so ignorant they should have their right to vote taken away. this is a complicated issue with so many tentacles wrapped around geopolitics that the most dangerous thing to do is listen to imbeciles.

Posted by: Mike at 05/31/2008 04:09:00 PM

The United States should list the cartels as terrorist groups such as it did with Al-Qaeda & aid Mexico in a war against such "cells". They are a greater threat to our nation than that in the Middle East.

Posted by: law-n-disorder at 06/03/2008 02:57:37 PM

This is shaping up to be another way that Americans will lose more rights.

Posted by: Roger at 06/13/2008 08:36:35 AM

Mexico is nowhere near as bad as Colombia was. It gets more coverage as the violence happens because it's on the US border. If Medellin and Cali with their parent provinces of Antioquia and Valle del Cauca were on the US/Mexico line, Americans would know the true meaning of terror. These places, or at least Medellin/Antioquia in the past, made or make anywhere in Mexico look like Disneyland.

Today's Video More Videos >>

Extra Cash for the Holidays

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement