PRINT
EMAIL
COMMENT
BUZZ UP
DIGGEXECUTIVE POLL
Bernard Madoff, convicted of running an $65 billion Ponzi scheme, was sentenced to 150 years in jail. What’s your take on his punishment?
OUR PREMIUM CONTENT
The Kiplinger Agriculture Letter
The Kiplinger California Letter
Kiplinger's Biofuels Market Alert
Kiplinger's Retirement Report
SUBSCRIBER HELP
CURRENT LETTER
Overhauling
Financial Regs
PREVIOUS ISSUES
Amtrak employees may strike as early as Feb. 1 over pay issues. Amtrak is offering signing bonuses of $4,500 per employee and a total pay raise of 24% between now and 2010. The unions, which have only received cost-of-living raises since their contract expired, want pay hikes to be retroactive to 2000, but Amtrak says no way. A spokesman for Amtrak says that would cost $215 million.
Negotiations have been going on for almost eight years without success between the national rail passenger service and nine of its 14 unions. A National Mediation Board recommended settlement which was rejected by both sides, leading to a 30-day cooling-off period. That will be followed, under the Railway Labor Act, by the appointment of a Presidential emergency board. That panel will have 30 days to offer a recommendation. If the two sides reject it, the unions can launch what would be the first strike in Amtrak history.
The disruptions in service would affect some commuter rail and freight lines, as well as Amtrak’s passengers -- about 25 million a year. Many commuter rail lines use Amtrak-owned track between Washington, D.C. and Boston, and many use Amtrak employees to operate trains. Chicago’s busy Union Station, for example, would be shut down by a strike because it depends on Amtrak workers. Some freight that travels on Amtrak-owned track on the East Coast would also be stopped if Amtrak employees go on strike.
But any strike would be short-lived, probably lasting less than a week. Congress will be quick to step in and impose a settlement. That won't be good news for the unions -- Congress would most likely favor Amtrak because lawmakers would be reluctant to saddle the cash-strapped carrier with a costly contract.
In a separate legislation, Congress is poised to give Amtrak more money for fiscal year 2008. When the dust settles, the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development's spending bill will include $1.45 billion for Amtrak, up from $1.3 billion in fiscal 2007. The legislation includes $75 million for a new grant program that matches state contributions for intercity passenger rail operations.
Long term prospects are even better for the rail carrier. With oil prices at record high and congestion worsening on highways and airports, lawmakers are looking at passenger rail as an important part of the nation’s infrastructure worthy of federal support. That sentiment bodes well for legislation to beef up Amtrak in other ways. The Senate already has approved a bill that authorizes $1.9 billion a year for six years and another $1.3 billion in bond authority. The House is expected to pass a nearly identical bill early next year.
The Senate bill also replaces an earlier requirement that Amtrak work toward financial self-sufficiency -- a goal supported by those criticizing Amtrak and its reliance on federal money -- with a commitment to improve service. The new legislation includes a new financial accounting system to provide better cost control and new quality standards for service.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.
POSTED BY: CONDUCTORS RULE (January 17, 2008 10:56 PM)
this is all crazy the fact that amtrak is even letting us get to this point is absurd.None of us want to strike but this company treats its personnel like pure crap, this is my 3rd big company i have worked for and it is insane the little respect we receive here. I'm on call 6 days a week 24 hrs a day..and they gripe about payback and raises. I bet you amtrak just like the MTA of NY have money stashed hidden away..the mta 2 years ago reported "2.8 billion dollars of profit that they didnt know about" yeahhh right!! Cough up the money because a strike of at least 3 or 4 days would cost more than the back pay. I feel so bad for the passengers because they shouldn't be able to go thru this. Hopefully everything gets settled and we can go back to normal. Much love to everyone out there supporting us.
POSTED BY: anthony giglietti (January 19, 2008 08:33 AM)
I was an amtrak employee for 10 years and had to leave the job for a better, more secure railroad i haven't had a raise or contract for 8 years as a conductor i feel bad for the employees and feel i should be entitled to all of my back pay. anyone with any suggestions?
POSTED BY: Sweatshopworker (May 06, 2008 10:24 PM)
I was an employee of Amtrak too and we were treated like dirt. We had not had a raise in 8 years and they cut jobs at every station and on every train to a skeleton crew, so there was no one to help people. They cut the rest of the workforce in half and required us to work harder and faster while not giving us a raise in 8 years! Wow! That made me work harder and be friendlier! Not! We got a 2 cent cost of living a while back and the union dues went up 50 cents... You cant feel helpful and happy when your boss concentrates more on employee quotas, numbers,& terminating people (so it looks like their saving money) instead of service. Management is in a frantic hatchet mode of cut and slash (just like all the other companies out there these days). The CEO pay keeps getting higher and higher while rank & file jobs must be slashed to make up for the big annual stratospheric bonus he will get. And the customer is the one who loses. I finally realized I was not wanted and Amtrak didnt appreciate workers, just feel-good numbers to justify management bonuses.
E-Mail Article
Print Article
Reprint Article
