PRINT
EMAIL
COMMENT
BUZZ UP
DIGGEXECUTIVE POLL
Bernard Madoff, convicted of running an $65 billion Ponzi scheme, was sentenced to 150 years in jail. What’s your take on his punishment?
OUR PREMIUM CONTENT
The Kiplinger Agriculture Letter
The Kiplinger California Letter
Kiplinger's Biofuels Market Alert
Kiplinger's Retirement Report
SUBSCRIBER HELP
CURRENT LETTER
Overhauling
Financial Regs
PREVIOUS ISSUES
Congress will soon restrict the sale of Social Security numbers, a legal practice that many believe is a major source of fraud. Lawmakers have increasingly blamed the rising number of identity theft cases on the largely unregulated sales of SSNs. And many agree with a recently released Government Accountability Office report stating that "vulnerabilities persist in federal laws addressing SSN collection and use by private sector entities."
Still, in order to move against the practice, which will likely be part of a broader ID theft bill, the new Democratic majority will make concessions to Republican leaders who have blocked such efforts in the past by arguing that federal interference would end up crimping legitimate businesses, such as those in the financial service sector.
So, expect the law that gets passed to make exceptions. The legislation will likely allow Social Security numbers to be used by law enforcement, public health officials and businesspeople running credit checks.
The law will also bar the display of SSNs on ID tags and membership cards. Groups that still want to use Social Security numbers in their database will be forced to truncate the numbers on cards and documents to five or fewer digits. Violators will face stiff fines and could be criminally charged. Federal funds may also be set aside and allocated to local governments around the country to help them remove online records publicly displaying SSNs.
The law will hit data brokers the hardest. Even though heightened scrutiny in recent years has forced many data brokers to tighten their guidelines on whom they'll sell to and whom they won't, the self-imposed restrictions haven't gone far enough to satisfy lawmakers.
Firms in the crosshairs range from giants such as Acxiom Corp., ChoicePoint and LexisNexis to smaller online Web sites, such as www.secret-info.com and www.Iinfosearch.com. No matter its size, each does business selling people's personal information, such as birth dates, maiden names, real estate records, civil judgments and criminal records to everyone from prospective employers to collection agencies to private detectives.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.
POSTED BY: madmilker (August 07, 2007 09:54 AM)
about time! but if the nincompoops allow credit check people, law enforcement, public health officials to have access to the numbers they gotta be "three sheets in the wind" if they think those people will keep it safe.
POSTED BY: Jeff (February 24, 2008 06:36 PM)
This legislation doesn't go far enough. First, the information is ours. We created it and we own it. Second, our tax dollars are used to fund the public resources that collect this information. Minimally, the legislation should 1) require the firm to contact any individual to inform them that an information search has been conducted against their name; and 2) that every individual whose information is accessed receives a licensing fee. To this latter point, the companies you cite all derive revenue and profit from the access and resale of this information. Individuals should be reimbursed given that their tax dollars created the record of the information in the first place.
E-Mail Article
Print Article
Reprint Article
