Business Resource Center
Subscribe

KIPLINGER FORECASTS

Home > Small Business
 
 

EXECUTIVE POLL

Bernard Madoff, convicted of running an $65 billion Ponzi scheme, was sentenced to 150 years in jail. What’s your take on his punishment?

Too heavy. There’s no point having him die in jail.
About right.
Not nearly heavy enough.
Not sure
 
   view results
Compare Price Quotes 100+ Services
ADVERTISEMENT
 
 

OUR PREMIUM CONTENT


The Kiplinger Letter
 
 
 

CURRENT LETTER

 
The Kiplinger Washington Editors
July 2, 2009
 

Overhauling
Financial Regs

By year-end or so, Congress will give the nod to a major rewriting of the nation's financial regulatory system. This week’s Kiplinger Letter explores whether the package will do more harm than good and what lawmakers are likely to include.
 
CORRECTIONS

TRY THE LETTER:

Subscribe
| See Sample
 
YOUR FEEDBACK
SUBSCRIBERLOG: Got a topic you'd like to discuss? Or a problem or question? Please join our exclusive forum for Letter subscribers only.
 
ASK US: A Kiplinger Letter editor will promptly answer subscriber questions.
 
 
OPEN FORUM: Share your insights and analysis with other visitors.
 
I just attended a franchise seminar. The speaker represents a few hundred franchises that (he says) are hand picked. He has the prospect (aka victim?) answer some questions about themselves then he makes recomendations - based on your personality, capital situation, etc.. If you pick a franchise, then he does some due dilligence for you. If you both decide it's a good idea, he helps you get started. He says he offers this service free of charge, which means he gets a commission if he's able to sell you a franchise. Has anyone done this? Successfully? Unsuccessfully?
-- fender
 

To E-Verify, or Not to E-Verify

A legal battle looms over a White House push to make all U.S. contractors screen workers with the Web-based system run by the government.
 
 

The Bush administration keeps pushing to require E-Verify employment checks.

And business keeps pushing back. Employers don't like the database system that is supposed to enable firms to verify Social Security numbers and green cards.

The latest clash is over a proposed rule that would require federal contractors, including many small businesses, to screen all their workers with the government Web-based system.

It's a replay of an earlier White House attempt to crack down on all employers that might be hiring illegal immigrants. The administration lost that one in court, and it'll likely lose this one, too, one way or another. An extended legal wrangle will postpone implementation until a new administration can take another look.

Opponents will likely sue to block the rule, arguing that the president doesn't have the authority because Congress made E-Verify voluntary.

They also say the program is unreliable and costly, especially for smaller firms. Small business groups say the costs cut into small businesses' margins, reducing their ability to successfully compete for federal contracts.

"Our profit margins are already so low. Why would small businesses even bother with this? To keep federal procurement competitive, you need to make it easy for small business," says Karen Kerrigan, president and CEO of the Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council.

"Federal procurement is so complex as is, looking for contracts…complying with federal government rules. This is just another barrier," she adds.

Although the system is free to use, opponents say costs add up from the man-hours it takes to comply with all of the requirements and the legal fees that stem from negotiating contracts under the new rule. They note that only about 70,000 employers are signed up to use the E-Verify program -- nearly 12 years after it was launched.

Critics argue that the system is clearly not foolproof as was shown after a raid on a Swift & Co. meatpacking plant that used E-Verify. Authorities found that several employees at the company gamed the system by using false Social Security numbers and stolen identities.

Business groups fret that glitches in the system would get even worse once hundreds of thousands of contractors began using it. However, the feds say the system is ready for the extra load. Moreover, a photo feature will be added, allowing for easier detection of identity theft. It will let an employer check the photo on his or her new hire's Employment Authorization Document (EAD) or green card against the approximately 15 million images stored in immigration databases maintained by the Department of Homeland Security.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

READER COMMENTS

Post a comment
 | 
Read all comments (1)


POSTED BY: HernandezUSA (September 09, 2008 03:42 PM)
"And business keeps pushing back. Employers don't like the database system that is supposed to enable firms to verify Social Security numbers and green cards. " Business owners DO NOT WANT to be held accountable for their actions with whom they hire. It all comes down to PROFITS and slave labor for business Owners is far cheaper then hiring a US Citizen. No vacations, sick time and safety concerns. Plus if they complain get them deported and hire another illegal. Well, No more. Even, if our Federal government continues to keep its head in the sand, its our STATE and LOCAL governments Job to enforce our LAWs and yes INCLUDING every AMERICAN citizen (ALL RACES) to keep out Illegal Aliens from OUR Country. Tell your Government you are tired and want them out and the business that hire the illegals held accountable.

SAVE, SHARE & DISCUSS:    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   
ADD HEADLINES: