Many people see mutual funds as a great investment vehicle. Consider the advantage: Because they’re funds that contain a variety of assets, you get automatic diversification. If Company A’s stock crashes, you’d lose a lot if you were directly invested in it. But if it’s only a portion of the mutual fund in your portfolio, your risk exposure is considerably less.
That idea isn’t wrong, but it’s also not entirely right. As with many things in the world of personal finance, it takes some digging under the surface to see why.
Monolithic diversification?
Over-reliance on mutual funds can lead to something I call the duplication trap. To understand what that means, consider the common scenario of a portfolio invested in more than one mutual fund.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Generally, when choosing a mutual fund, you look for the ones that perform the best. If you invest in 15 of the top-performing mutual funds, the logical assumption is that you’re well-diversified: Each mutual fund is itself diversified because it owns multiple assets. If one of the mutual funds makes unfortunate investment decisions and performs poorly, because you’re diversified in mutual funds themselves, the other 14 can help buffer the losses.
Making that assumption, however, risks a fall into a duplication trap. Consider why those 15 funds are the top-performing funds. Odds are, it’s because they’re all investing in largely the same assets! For example, if Mutual Fund 1 invests in Microsoft, Apple, Google and Nvidia, and so do Mutual Funds 2 through 15, then what you’ve done is invest in the same four tech companies 15 times. Suddenly, all that diversification doesn’t seem so diverse.
This is why it’s important to investigate what exactly the mutual fund you’re considering is invested in, especially if you already have other mutual funds in your portfolio. There’s no point in getting a second mutual fund that virtually mirrors the first — you might as well just increase your position in the first fund.
Unanticipated fees
I recently worked with a client who had about $1.3 million invested in mutual funds. She’d been working with a large financial services firm that charged fees for their services. What she failed to understand is her fees didn’t stop there. Each mutual fund has an expense ratio — a fee you pay for the management of the fund, separate from your adviser. She was paying considerably more than she realized in fees to hold multiple mutual funds that were all largely duplicates of one another.
This is a common hazard when working with very large financial services firms. When a firm scales up its operations to accommodate millions of clients, it must streamline. It’s impossible to individualize advice for every client, so the firm usually puts each client into a risk-tolerance category and then chooses funds for that category rather than the individuals in it.
This generally leads to a lack of diversity in your investment options, which can lead to paying excessive fees while tumbling headlong into the duplication trap.
Uncontrollable income
Another weakness of a mutual fund-heavy portfolio is most funds pass on the earnings (capital gains) to the fund holder, you. Each year, the investor must pay capital gains taxes on the distribution, regardless of whether you wanted it or not. You might ask, who wouldn’t want someone handing them cash in exchange for having to pay taxes? However, taxes aren’t the only issues these distributions can cause.
The client I mentioned above retired early, well before she was eligible for Medicare. When you do that, you need to find a way to cover your health care until you become eligible. This can be very expensive unless you qualify for reduced-cost plans through the Affordable Care Act. To qualify, your income needs to remain under certain limits depending on your household size.
If you’re heavily invested in mutual funds, all of which are sending you money each year, you may not be able to keep your income under those limits. Dividends for people with sizable stakes can be in the tens of thousands of dollars, forcing you to pay very high insurance premiums until you become eligible for Medicare at age 65.
This is a good example of why it’s important, as you near retirement, to consider how your investments might impact your finances in unexpected ways. Will they force you to pay too much for health care? Will they move you into a higher tax bracket? You need to be in control of how your retirement money gets distributed to avoid unpleasant surprises in health care spending or tax season.
In general, mutual funds are a solid choice for younger-to-middle-age investors who don’t yet have a financial adviser, especially if they’re part of your employer-sponsored 401(k) where a company match is available. As you approach retirement and start shopping for a financial professional, it’s a good idea to consider whether you should continue that strategy. Work with your adviser to determine the best investment strategy for your unique situation as you approach and enter retirement.
Related Content
- Soon-to-Be Retirees, Beware: Small-Caps Are Cheap for a Reason
- Best Dividend Stocks for Dependable Dividend Growth
- How to Avoid Capital Gains Taxes
- Stock Picks That Billionaires Love
- Warren Buffett Stocks: The Berkshire Hathaway Portfolio
-
Risk Is Off Again, Dow Falls 397 Points: Stock Market TodayMarket participants are weighing still-solid earnings against both expectations and an increasingly opaque economic picture.
-
I Inherited $50,000, and My Retirement is Already Fully Funded. Where's the Best Place to Store It for Maximum Growth?These savings solutions can help you maximize returns without the risk.
-
Parents and Caregivers: Don't Miss Your Roth Conversion WindowCaring for a child or parent can mean a drop in income and a lower tax bracket. Why not take advantage by moving money into a Roth account? Here's how it works.
-
Testing the Retirement Waters in Florida? A Partial Plunge May Negate Tax BreaksMost folks know Florida is a tax-friendly state, but they might not know that part-time residents may not qualify, as our cautionary tale shows.
-
Catch-Up Contributions for Higher Earners in 457(b) Plans: What You Need to KnowGovernment 457(b) plans are about to get more complex as new Roth catch-up requirements come into force. Here's how to prepare for the changes.
-
I'm a Financial Planner: This Is Why Commitment, Not Perfection, Drives Financial SuccessMeeting your goals is more likely if you stick to your strategy despite market volatility and scary headlines. Consistency makes a difference.
-
I'm a Financial Professional: This Is Why Now Is the Time for Investors to Look AbroadExtreme U.S. market concentration has made international equities not just a diversification play, but a timely opportunity.
-
Four Ways to Make the Most of Your Benefits During Open EnrollmentOpen enrollment is a chance to make sure you're getting every ounce of value from your workplace benefits and on track to reach your long-term financial goals.
-
Your Estate Plan Isn't 'Done' Until You've Completed These Five Steps, From an Estate Planning AttorneyCongratulations on getting your estate plan in order. Now, you need to communicate the relevant details to ensure your plan is effectively carried out.
-
A Nightmare for Parents: How to Navigate the Legal Boundaries of Tenant Rights During a Family CrisisThis family's story illustrates how important it is to get help sooner rather than later and highlights the complexities of tenant rights and legal protections.
