Yes, Air Canada Must Pay A Partial Refund For Its Chatbot Error
A court ruling has sided with a passenger who was offered false information via AI about the airline's bereavement policy.
Air Canada is financially responsible for a website chatbot error that misled a passenger, according to a recent ruling by a Canadian tribunal. Now the airline must partially refund the passenger for the ticket price.
Air Canada customer Jake Moffatt, who requested information about the airline's bereavement policy from its chatbot after his grandmother died in 2022, was informed that a reduced bereavement fare could be claimed retroactively for his flight from Vancouver to Toronto.
But when he attempted to claim the refund, he was informed by an Air Canada employee that the airline does not, in fact, offer that service.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
A screenshot included in the February 14 decision from the Civil Resolution Tribunal of British Columbia detailed what the chatbot told him:
"If you need to travel immediately or have already travelled and would like to submit your ticket for a reduced bereavement rate, kindly do so within 90 days of the date your ticket was issued by completing our Ticket Refund Application form."
The airline claimed it was not responsible for discrepancies between its artificial intelligence (AI) entities and its actual policies, a notion that, according to tribunal member Christopher Rivers, is "remarkable."
"Air Canada argues it cannot be held liable for information provided by one of its agents, servants or representatives — including a chatbot," Rivers wrote in his decision. "It does not explain why it believes that is the case."
Rivers said the airline suggests that the chatbot is a separate legal entity that is responsible for its own actions. "This is a remarkable submission," he said. "While a chatbot has an interactive component, it is still just a part of Air Canada’s website. It should be obvious to Air Canada that it is responsible for all the information on its website. It makes no difference whether the information comes from a static page or a chatbot."
Moffatt is entitled to $812.02, according to the decision.
Air Canada did not immediately return a Kiplinger request for comment. According to a Vancouver Sun report on February 15, however, the airline said it would comply with the decision and had no further comment.
Tough time for airlines
This news comes during a time when airlines are being taken to task by both customers and employees over complaints about fairness.
In 2023, Spirit Airlines settled a class-action lawsuit brought by customers who were charged additional carry-on fees after booking through online travel agents to the tune of $8.25 million.
American Airlines, which just raised checked baggage fees, was ordered to pay more than $4 million last year for illegally keeping passengers on the tarmac for hours at a time without giving them the option to deplane.
Airlines, like many businesses, have begun to rely increasingly on the use of AI to assist with customer service issues like the one in Moffatt's case.
As of February 20 Air Canada did not appear to have a chatbot feature on its website.
In the U.S., the Department of Transportation (DOT) advises air travelers with complaints against an airline to give the airline a chance to resolve them by filing complaints directly with the airline, which is required to acknowledge complaints within 30 days of receiving them and to send written responses to the travelers within 60 days.
Those who believe their problem remains unresolved, however, can file their complaints with the DOT itself.
RELATED CONTENT
-
A Top Vanguard ETF Pick Outperforms on International StrengthA weakening dollar and lower interest rates lifted international stocks, which was good news for one of our favorite exchange-traded funds.
-
Is There Such a Thing As a Safe Stock? 17 Safe-Enough IdeasNo stock is completely safe, but we can make educated guesses about which ones are likely to provide smooth sailing.
-
We're 64 with $4.3 million and can't agree on when to retire.I want to retire now and pay for health insurance until we get Medicare. My wife says we should work 10 more months. Who's right?
-
5 Laundry Habits That Are Costing You MoneyYou might be flushing money down the drain if you have any of these laundry habits.
-
My First $1 Million: Banking Executive, 37, NashvilleEver wonder how someone who's made a million dollars or more did it? Kiplinger's My First $1 Million series uncovers the answers.
-
10 Decluttering Books That Can Help You Downsize Without RegretFrom managing a lifetime of belongings to navigating family dynamics, these expert-backed books offer practical guidance for anyone preparing to downsize.
-
New Ways to Keep Your Online Accounts SafeAs cybercrime evolves, the strategies you use to protect yourself need to evolve, too.
-
Can Your Car Insurance Add Strangers to Your Policy? A Florida Class Action Lawsuit Could DecideA Florida driver says GEICO added complete strangers to her car insurance policy and jacked up premiums as a result.
-
Life Loves to Throw Curveballs, So Ditch the Rigid Money Rules and Do This InsteadSome rules are too rigid for real life. A values-based philosophy is a more flexible approach that helps you retain confidence — whatever life throws at you.
-
The Best Short-Term CD for Your Cash in 2026This strategy can help you earn thousands in months.
-
What Is an Assumable Mortgage and Could It Save You Thousands?With mortgage rates still elevated, taking over a seller’s existing home loan could lower monthly payments — if the numbers work.
