What a Federal Grants Pause Could Have Meant for Social Security and Medicare
The White House rescinded a pause on all Federal grants and loans, but the short-lived action shined a light on what could come in the future.


Retirees can breathe a sigh of relief, at least for now. While the White House budget office ordered a pause on all federal grants and loans effective as of 5:00 pm on Tuesday January 28, the short-lived action was rescinded Wednesday after it caused chaos and confusion. While Social Security and Medicare were excluded from the list, other programs that provide support to older adults could have lost temporary funding.
“OMB Memorandum M-25-13 is rescinded. If you have questions about implementing the President’s Executive Orders, please contact your agency General Counsel,” a memo obtained by CNN read.
It's not surprising that the White House backtracked. In addition to a federal judge Tuesday temporarily blocking the funding freeze, according to the Associated Press (AP) , the move faced fierce criticism.

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Even after the OMB Memorandum was rescinded, questions remained about the federal funding pause after comments made by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on X who wrote: "This is NOT a rescission of the federal funding freeze. It is simply a rescission of the OMB memo. Why? To end any confusion created by the court's injunction. The President's EO's on federal funding remain in full force and effect, and will be rigorously implemented."
Her comments added to the confusion, as it was the rescinded memo and not the executive orders that described a temporary pause in funding. It's not clear what the White House will do next.
When announcing the funding freeze, Matthew J. Vaeth, acting director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) wrote in a memorandum that of the close to $10 trillion spent by the federal government, over 30%, or $3 trillion, went to federal financial assistance, such as grants and loans.
“Financial assistance should be dedicated to advancing administration priorities, focusing taxpayer dollars to advance a stronger and safer America, eliminating the financial burden of inflation for citizens, unleashing American energy and manufacturing, ending ‘wokeness’ and the weaponization of government, promoting efficiency in government, and Making America Healthy Again,” wrote Vaeth.
Vaeth said that taxpayer dollars should not be used for programs that do not "improve the day-to-day lives of those we serve" or are ideological in nature.
Vaeth said the pause would give the Administration time to review agency programs and determine the best use of the funding in line with the laws and President Donald Trump’s priorities. In a footnote, Vaeth said, “Nothing in this memo should be construed to impact Medicare or Social Security benefits.”
Social Security and Medicare safe for now
It’s unclear what impact a spending pause would have had on many federal financial assistance programs. Still, Democrats said it could impact disaster relief, aid to the nation’s seniors and school lunch programs, among many other programs.
Originally all agencies had until February 10 to submit detailed information to the OMB on any of the programs, projects and activities subject to the pause. Any funding not aligned with President Trump’s executive orders and agenda could be on the chopping block. The memo did make clear that in addition to Social Security and Medicare, the pause would not have included assistance provided directly to individuals.
In a letter to Vaeth, Senate Appropriations Committee Vice Chair Patty Murray and House Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro raised the alarm on what they called President Trump’s unlawful executive orders and the new memoranda issued by OMB directing agencies to withhold vast swaths of approved federal funding.
“As leaders of the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations, we write with extreme alarm about the Administration’s efforts to undermine Congress’s power of the purse, threaten our national security, and deny resources for states, localities, American families, and businesses,” wrote the legislators. “The scope of what you are ordering is breathtaking, unprecedented, and will have devastating consequences across the country. We write today to urge you in the strongest possible terms to uphold the law and the Constitution and ensure all federal resources are delivered in accordance with the law.”
Bottom line
Since President Trump began his second term he has signed a flurry of executive orders to better align the government with his vision for America. So far Social Security and Medicare has been untouchable, which is good news for retirees relying on these important benefits.
Related content
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Donna Fuscaldo is the retirement writer at Kiplinger.com. A writer and editor focused on retirement savings, planning, travel and lifestyle, Donna brings over two decades of experience working with publications including AARP, The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Investopedia and HerMoney.
-
Cord Cutting Could Help You Save Over $10,000 in 10 Years
How cutting the cord can save you money and how those savings can grow over time.
-
The '8-Year Rule of Social Security' — A Retirement Rule
The '8-Year Rule of Social Security' holds that it's best to be like Ike — Eisenhower, that is. The five-star General knew a thing or two about good timing.
-
The '8-Year Rule of Social Security' — A Retirement Rule
The '8-Year Rule of Social Security' holds that it's best to be like Ike — Eisenhower, that is. The five-star General knew a thing or two about good timing.
-
Tips for Expat Retirees, From Expat Retirees
You may enjoy a lower cost of living by moving abroad, but it requires careful planning.
-
You Were Planning to Retire This Year: Should You Go Ahead?
If the economic climate is making you doubt whether you should retire this year, these three questions will help you make up your mind.
-
Are You Owed Money Thanks to the SSFA? You Might Need to Do Something to Get It
The Social Security Fairness Act removed restrictions on benefits for people with government pensions. If you're one of them, don't leave money on the table. Here's how you can be proactive in claiming what you're due.
-
From Wills to Wishes: An Expert Guide to Your Estate Planning Playbook
Consider supplementing your traditional legal documents with this essential road map to guide your loved ones through the emotional and logistical details that will follow your loss.
-
Why Retirees Need a Budget, According to a New Retiree
A new retiree explains why retirees need a budget.
-
Hiring a Financial Adviser: 10 Questions to Ask
When hiring a financial adviser, ask these 10 questions to weed out the duds and find the right person to manage your nest egg. After all, you're the boss.
-
Your Home + Your IRA = Your Long-Term Care Solution
If you're worried that long-term care costs will drain your retirement savings, consider a personalized retirement plan that could solve your problem.