The Humpty Dumpty economy has fallen off a wall, and while the government scrambles to put the pieces back together again, lawmakers are also furiously examining the scene of the crime to see who shoved him down in the first place. Democrats are quick to blame the Bush administration's lax regulatory approach, while Republicans increasingly point a finger at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- and the Democrats who refused to rein them in -- for causing the housing bubble to collapse and creating financial ruin.
One reason that blaming Fannie and Freddie is in fashion now is that looking elsewhere creates too many headaches. Blaming the banks would hamper attempts to woo them into helping out with economic rescues. (The Obama administration has already had to backpedal on its criticism of excessive executive bonuses after some firms became hesitant about getting involved with government programs.) Lawmakers aren't going to take the blame for not being more vigilant, and few are eager to criticize voters for buying homes they couldn't afford.
Those who blame Fannie and Freddie say they not only failed to spot the housing bubble but they also contributed directly to it by securitizing mortgages and making it so easy for so many to buy a home. There's undoubtedly some truth to that, but defenders of Fannie and Freddie say they had a relatively minor role in the push for easy credit.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
The truth is more complicated than either side claims. An economic rout this big doesn't lend itself to easy answers. There's the problem of low interest rates that fed an appetite of home buying; a culture of excessive spending that pushed savings rates into negative territory; new financial products that weren't understood by the banks that created them; housing policies that promoted loose underwriting standards; and state and federal regulators who were clueless about shenanigans happening under their nose.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac played a role in all of these areas. But it was Wall Street banks that created the practice of bundling loans into packages and selling them off to investors, allowing them to leverage their balance sheets to outrageous levels.
Fannie and Freddie came late to the game and quickly grew to dominate it, taking it to new highs, and they certainly failed to see the trouble coming. But Fannie and Freddie say they had little choice because they are half public and had to get into the securitization game to keep shareholders happy. That also gave them vast pools of money to play with. By the time the government placed the failing agencies into conservatorship last year, they had owned or guaranteed $5 trillion worth of mortgages.
Fannie and Freddie may not have given the economy its fatal push, but they certainly accessories to the crime.
-
Nasdaq Sinks 418 Points as Tech Chills: Stock Market TodayInvestors, traders and speculators are growing cooler to the AI revolution as winter approaches.
-
23 Last-Minute Gifts That Still Arrive Before ChristmasScrambling to cross those last few names off your list? Here are 23 last-minute gifts that you can still get in time for Christmas.
-
The Rule of Compounding: Why Time Is an Investor's Best FriendDescribed as both a "miracle" and a "wonder," compound interest is simply a function of time.
-
Kiplinger's 2020 Election ForecastPolitics For nearly a century, The Kiplinger Letter has forecasted the outcome of presidential elections to keep readers informed of what's coming and what it means for them. Here's our call for 2020.
-
How the GOP Tax Bill May Affect BusinessesBusiness Costs & Regulation Corporations would enjoy a lower flat tax rate while individual owners of pass-throughs would also see a lower rate, but with more complex terms.
-
The Long Slog in Congress After Comey
Politics Trump's firing of the FBI director ruffled congressional feathers, but not enough to spur an independent investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election.
-
Trump’s Tax Reform Plan Faces Tough ChallengesPolitics A one-page outline isn't enough to satisfy a Congress interested in the details — and protecting constituents.
-
Trump's Agenda and ChallengesPolitics What lies ahead for the President-Elect.
-
Clinton on Track to Win 2016 Presidential Election
Politics Trump can win the White House, but faces an uphill climb.
-
New Overtime Rules Will Hit Businesses This YearBusiness Costs & Regulation A change in salary threshold will make more workers eligible for extra pay.
-
Bumpy Road Ahead in 2016 Presidential Race
Politics Trump will get a bounce after the Republican convention, but Clinton is poised to regain ground.
