Should the Feds Call the Shots on Salaries?

Kiplinger's editor in chief tackles queries about executive compensation and union involvement.

Q: Do you think Washington has the right to set, or at least influence, the salaries of senior executives in the companies it rescued with huge infusions of capital, such as AIG, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and General Motors?

Certainly -- both the right and obligation. The right to set pay levels for senior executives in the private sector should lie exclusively with corporate boards of directors, who should (but sometimes don't) represent the interests of their shareholders. If -- but only if -- Washington becomes a major equity investor in a company (as opposed to a lender, however large), it should have seats at the boardroom table. If Washington's directors on the board believe that executive compensation is excessive and doesn't serve the interests of all shareholders -- who now include the general tax-paying public -- they should work with other directors to reduce it.

Subscribe to Kiplinger’s Personal Finance

Be a smarter, better informed investor.

Save up to 74%
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hwgJ7osrMtUWhk5koeVme7-200-80.png

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.

Sign up

To continue reading this article
please register for free

This is different from signing in to your print subscription


Why am I seeing this? Find out more here

Knight Kiplinger
Editor Emeritus, Kiplinger

Knight came to Kiplinger in 1983, after 13 years in daily newspaper journalism, the last six as Washington bureau chief of the Ottaway Newspapers division of Dow Jones. A frequent speaker before business audiences, he has appeared on NPR, CNN, Fox and CNBC, among other networks. Knight contributes to the weekly Kiplinger Letter.