Credit & Money Management
7 Ways to Check Out a Charity
Make sure you’re donating to a first-rate organization.
By Jane Bennett Clark, Senior Associate Editor
From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, January 2009
- Comments
- Email This Article
- Print This Article
- Order a Reprint
Advertisement
Editor's note: This article was updated in December 2009.
A 5.7% drop in donations over a recent 12-month period -- the biggest decline in more than 50 years -- means that charities need your money now more than ever. It also means that you need to be sure a charity wrings the most possible good out of your gift.
Here are seven measures of a charity’s ability to deliver on your good intentions:
Efficiency. Expect the charity to devote at least 75% of its budget to programs, with the remaining 25% going to administrative costs and fund-raising. Seven out of ten charities meet or exceed the 75% standard, says Matt Viola, of Charity Navigator, a charity evaluator. Those that allocate more than 25% on overhead are wasting precious resources.
Concrete results. Check the mission statement on the organization’s Web site to see that the group has clear goals and the ability to execute them. For instance, if the group claims to protect land, find out how much land it protected in a given period. Some nonprofits muddle along for years without making a dent in their core mission or achieving long-term results. If you have questions about a charity’s effectiveness, call the staff and invite them to respond.
Assets. Charities must file Form 990 with the IRS annually. Look at the line that indicates whether the charity has ended the year with positive or negative assets. (If you can’t find the tax form on the charity’s Web site, call and ask for a copy.) Ending one year in negative territory doesn’t necessarily mean the organization is going under, says Laurie Styron, of the American Institute of Philanthropy, which rates charities. But if the organization comes up short for several years in a row, she says, “that’s an indication it could be winding down. Your contribution could be used to pay legal fees or creditors rather than the programs you are intending to support.”
Capital reserves. Tough as it may be for organizations to maintain reserves when times are tight, “it’s even more critical now because they might need that capital,” says Viola. To keep the lights on while donations are down, a charity should have at least six months’ to a year’s worth of working capital, expressed as “working capital ratio” at Charitynavigator.org.
Auditor’s commentary. Often attached to the charity’s annual report, the statement includes the auditor’s assessment of the charity’s health. Look for the word unqualified, which indicates that the auditor has signed off on the charity’s finances without reservation. Qualified means there is some issue, “and the auditor will specifically state what it is,” says Styron -- perhaps the loss of a major donor or a precipitous drop in contributions.
Executive compensation. A salary of $158,000 represents the average annual pay for executives of medium-size to large charitable organizations, according to a 2009 survey by Charitynavigator.org. The executive of a complex, multi-million-dollar charity might justifiably command that amount or more, says Viola; not so much the CEO of a group that operates on $500,000 or less. “That’s a big part of the budget.”
Complaints. Most states not only require registration for charities that solicit within their borders but also track complaints against them. (Here's a list of the state agencies that regulate charities.) If your state does not require registration, look for information in states that do, such as New York, which provides a searchable database at www.charitiesnys.com. The Better Business Bureau also tracks complaints against charities.
Topics:
- Comments
- RSS
Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy



Reader Comments (6)
Posted by: Charlie Mattingly at 11/25/2008 06:45:40 PM
The best place to check out charities is www.bbb.org, where the Better Business Bureau's Wise Giving Alliance posts reports that evaluate charities against 20 standards for charitable accountability. Charities that meet BBB/WGA standards are charities that will handle your hard-earned dollars responsibly to benefit the causes that you have chosen to help.
Posted by: MP at 02/22/2009 10:00:20 AM
A couple of thoughts - why not choose to get involved with a charity as a volunteer? Then you can really get a sense as to how they operate and if your donation will be well spent. Also, be careful when using watchdog sites like Charity Navigator and even the organization's 990s. The way some information is analyzed and reported is misleading. As just one example, special event income in the 990s is reported such that events that actually net thousands can look like they lost money due to the peculiar way the 990s request event information. (ie expenses are subtracted from ticket sales when in reality an event typically has tens of thousands of dollars in corporate sponsorships - contributions - that's how money is made, not through ticket sales. Contributions are reported on a separate line.) Also if a charity is "in the red" consider the percentage of the loss to the overall budget. Donors give on their own timetables and sometimes it is just a matter of timing. A $50,000 gift expected on June 30th arrived on July 1. In a $4 million budget that shouldn't be a big concern. If it is a $200,000 budget, that's another story. Watchdog sites are a starting point but be sure to also check out the charity with the charity itself.
Posted by: Gary Wood at 12/23/2009 11:59:26 AM
Your comments regarding auditors reports contains errors that, I think, cause it to be seriously misleading...Auditors reports do not use the word unqualified, they do not report on an entity's health, nor do they sign off on an entity's finances. For a not-for-profit entity, auditors express an opinion on the fair presentation of the entity's financial position and changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the period presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States...If an auditor does not think an entity will survive for at least a year, they will report that, otherwise, an auditor only reports on the presentation, the reader must make his or her own evaluation as to...the entity's health.
Posted by: Galler at 01/15/2010 10:35:36 AM
Charity Navigator's methods are outdated. A site like givewell.net gives a better recommendation of charities based on outcomes....On their blog, they assess the value of the metrics that organizations like Charity Navigator use to determine how "effective" your donations are in providing real and lasting positive outcomes. Charity Navigator CEO Ken Berger actually responds to the claims made by Givewell in link posted on the blog. Guess what? He agrees with Givewell. blog.givewell.net/2009/12/01/the-worst-way-to-pick-a-charity/#comments
Posted by: anon at 01/15/2010 05:52:27 PM
there's some jumbled information here... the word "unqualified" does not appear in the auditor's report. if the auditor issues an unqualified opinion, you'll see wording more along the lines of "presented fairly." This does not mean the company is financially sound. Only if the company shows signs that it may not survive past one year, the auditor's report may contain a 'going concern' disclosure. If it has a going concern issue, it's probably way too late in the game. Analyzing a 990 can be just as nuanced (if not more) than reading an audited financial statement. If you haven't read too many or worked with one (which the average joe likely has not), you're probably not going to fully understand what the line items really mean.
Posted by: Nomen at 01/16/2010 09:32:57 AM
A few years ago my neighborhood was hit by a major tornado. The Salvation Army showed up the next day with free food and coffee for the victims. The State National Guard also showed up to stop looting. The Red Cross showed up two days later and charged for everything. The Federal Government showed up a week later offering only low interest loans and tons of red tape to get them. Most of the clean up work was done by the victims with the aid of volunteers from the surrounding towns. Local city employees hauled the wreckage away. The old phrase that "Charity begins at home" had new meaning. I start with local charities and only give to those that I can see doing something.