Employee Health Care
Health Care: 10 Frequently
Asked Questions
The new law will mean huge changes for businesses, insurers and individuals.
By Martha Lynn Craver, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter
March 23, 2010
- Comments
- Email This Article
- Print This Article
- Order a Reprint
Advertisement
The health care bill is more than two thousand pages long -- with hundreds more to come from regulators filling in the details. It will literally take years before all the details are set and everyone can see how the plan will affect their particular situation. But here are 10 commonly asked questions that can be answered now:
• I own a business with 35 employees. I don’t provide health care insurance, but I’m hoping to soon. How will this bill affect me? Because you have more than 25 workers, you won’t get the employer tax credits that start right away. Instead, you’ll have to wait until 2014, which is when states start operating the Small Business Health Options Program, or SHOP Exchanges, where small businesses will be able to pool together to buy insurance. The Congressional Budget Office forecasts that the exchanges would bring premiums down as much as 4% while still adding more people to the rolls of insured.
• What if my business grows to more than 50 workers? Starting in 2014, firms with 50 or more workers will be required to offer either health care insurance or pay a fee of up to $2,000 per full-time employee if any of their workers gets government subsidized insurance coverage in the exchanges. The first 30 workers would be excluded from the assessment.
• I’m self-employed and buy insurance on my own. Last year, it went up $200 a month, and I’m worried it will go up more in the future because of this bill. Will it? That is hard to predict. The legislation does immediately create a process for reviewing increases in health plan premiums and requires plans to justify any increases. And once the state-based American Health Benefit Exchanges are up and running in 2014, you will be able to shop for health insurance among competing carriers.
• My employer has a good health plan. Will I have to pay more? Not as a result of the legislation. Your costs may go up in the next few years, but rising medical costs are mostly to blame for what’s driving up premiums now. The health reform law does contain cost control provisions, but they won’t have much of an effect on medical costs for at least five years.
• I’m a Medicare beneficiary. Should I expect to pay more? That’s certainly possible later on, but in the short term, you’ll pay less for preventive services and for prescription drugs. Starting in 2011, those in Medicare will receive free preventive care services, such as screenings for colon, prostate and breast cancer. Plus the threshold for income related Medicare Part B premiums for 2011 through 2019 will be frozen.
At the same time, those beneficiaries who have high drug costs and fall into the “doughnut hole” coverage gap will get a $250 rebate this year. In 2011, beneficiaries in the gap will be able to get a 50% discount on brand-name drugs. By 2020, the gap would be eliminated. That means that seniors, who now pay 100% of their drug costs once they’re in the doughnut hole, will pay 25%.
But, Medicare Part D premium costs would be higher for high-income beneficiaries -- individuals with incomes above $85,000 and couples with more than $170,000.
• My Medicare is supplemented by my former employer. Is that in danger? If your former employer offers prescription drug coverage to Medicare eligible retirees, that benefit may be in danger. Starting in 2013, the tax break employers get for providing that benefit to retirees will be eliminated, increasing the likelihood that employers will drop it.
You may have to pay more if your supplemental coverage is through Medicare Advantage, since government payments to those plans will be decreased over the next three years, to bring payments on a par with traditional Medicare. You could lose extra benefits such as free eyeglasses and hearing aids.
• I make $300,000 a year and have a very generous employer paid health plan. How much more will I have to pay? You do face higher taxes. Starting in 2013, individuals will pay a higher Medicare payroll tax of 2.35% on earnings of more than $200,000 a year and couples earning more than $250,000, up from the current 1.45%. You’ll also face an additional 3.8% tax on unearned income such as dividends and interest over the threshold. Furthermore, starting in 2018, the law also will impose a 40% excise tax on the portion of most employer sponsored health coverage that exceeds $10,200 a year for individuals and $27,500 for families.
• I just graduated from college. I don’t have a job and can’t afford insurance. Will I be affected? You will be eligible for coverage under your parents’ health care plan as long as you are single, under age 26 and are not eligible for other employer provided health coverage. This will be available for plan years beginning six months from now or later.
• My family has income of about $60,000, but we haven’t been able to afford health insurance. Can we get it now? You might be eligible for government subsidies to help you pay for private insurance that will be sold in the new health exchanges that will begin operation in 2014. Premium subsidies will be available for families with incomes from $29,327 to $88,000. But there’s no help until then.
• My insurance coverage was canceled last year when I exceeded the lifetime cap. Can I get back on it now? You probably would qualify for the new high-risk pools, which will be effective within 90 days of the bill’s enactment. A participant will pay the full cost, but the premiums will be set as if the person does not have a preexisting condition.
How will Obama’s heath care bill affect YOUR small business? Find out by clicking here.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.
- Comments
- RSS
Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy


Reader Comments (42)
Posted by: JD at 03/24/2010 02:23:16 PM
My employer has a good health plan. Will I have to pay more? Wrong answer. The answer is yes, because the Cadillac tax isn't indexed to inflation (ceiling isn't too high to begin with) and because the addition of high priced previously denied people to the rolls will increase premiums overall. The "cost controls" will have little effect. You don't control costs by price fixing. Every review will either have to admit that the increase is justified or risk systemic collapse by preventing insurers from meeting their expenses.
Posted by: Pooh at 03/25/2010 04:04:47 AM
I am married. My husband and I earn about $24,000 a year. We are over 26 years old. We cannot afford for insurance. How does the new law affect me?
Posted by: Federalist45 at 03/25/2010 08:19:09 AM
You are painting a very rosy picture, generally, of a law that will devastate the American economy, enhance and ensure federal intrusion into the marketplace, guarantee federal government intrusion into the personal finances of every American, raise taxes for all Americans (whether we call them taxes or not), cover tens of millions of illegals and, following certain amnesty, "legals" they invite into the United States, and diminish the quality of health care worldwide (because the U.S. currently is on the cutting edge of health care improvement through education, technology, and professionalism but will be reduced to average, at best, within 10 years). Be honest here--this law may be the single, broadest, federal powergrab in history, and it will change our lives forever--and for the worst.
Posted by: PurpposelyVague at 03/25/2010 01:35:35 PM
My employer has a good health plan. Will I have to pay more? Wrong answer. The answer is yes. Ditto JD. You state the answers yourself in this article www.kiplinger.com/businessresource/forecast/archive/health-care-reform-tax-hikes-on-the-way.html that says that in 2011 everyone will start paying taxes for the value of their health insurance on their W-2.
Posted by: Mandy at 03/25/2010 02:50:31 PM
My husband works for a large global company. I called to see when the expanded coverage for children up to age 26 goes into effect and was told that since they are self-insured though BCBSIL they do not have to comply with this provision. This was a surprise to me.
Posted by: Morgan Downey at 03/28/2010 12:08:11 PM
Obesity is obviously a major health problem and health care reform impacts it quite substantially. My analysis is at www.downeyobesityreport.com
Posted by: Ralph at 03/29/2010 02:18:14 PM
I'm Self Insured. I pay as I go. I do not need or will i buy health Insurance. i also will not pay a fine...see you in court
Posted by: iriegeorge at 04/06/2010 01:26:18 PM
How is any of this going to help? All I see is more tax dollars going to be paid in and health premiums going up. How is this going to help? Have to agree with other poster, see ya in court!
Posted by: missy at 04/06/2010 02:59:36 PM
I have health insurance now $5000 deductable $40/copay, noperscription no dental no vision. Is this adequete according to the government??????
Posted by: gs at 04/06/2010 03:07:45 PM
I am a retired military veteran covered under Tricare and will be turning 65 in two years. What is the net effect of all this on me? Lots of rumors both good and bad.
Posted by: Missy at 04/06/2010 04:28:44 PM
I dont understand how a tax "credit" is going to help lower-middle income families pay for insurance.......that is retarded. To purchase a decent plan for us (self-employed) it would cost about $9,000.00 plus a year. We cannot afford that even with a "credit". I realize we need health insurance but we also need a place to live. Health insurance these days cost more than our house note. What are we supposed to do? Let our home go to pay for health insurance? No sir, not I sir. The government can keep their worthless "credit" and leave the American people alone to chose whether to have insurance or not. We can only do what we can. When we can afford it, we will buy it. It is not the responsibility of the wealthy to pay for what I can't afford. That will only hurt the economy more because the price of EVERYTHING will rise keeping people like us in the hole and maybe even put us out of work.
Posted by: clk at 04/06/2010 04:33:41 PM
I just graduated from college. I don’t have a job and can’t afford insurance. Will I be affected? this was the question but you dlid not address the issue, because the person could be over 26 when they graduate from college. So address the issue about a person who is over 26 and can't afford health insurance
Posted by: Gary at 04/06/2010 05:09:46 PM
With the value of health benefits being placed on W-2's, does this mean our health benefits will now be considered taxable income?
Posted by: BS at 04/06/2010 05:16:55 PM
I WILL SEE THEM IN COURT ALSO RALPH! THIS IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Posted by: fb at 04/06/2010 07:42:35 PM
Please explain the 40% excise tax on the portion of most employers sponsored health coverage.
Posted by: RC at 04/06/2010 08:01:48 PM
A=my medical insurance went up about 30pct immediately when the "reform" was eminent. Thanks Blue Cross/Bluie Shield and the Government who, under the guises of helping me out, has demoted me to the lower class. B=Unfortunately I make sooo much money[hah] I can't get food stamps or Govt. assistance. C=I get to stand in line at the grocery store and watch the wic and ebt pierced, tatooed, and well-dressed Govt hand-out participants spending my tax money while I can barely afford to drive to work. Maybe the Govt. can give them insurance as well.
Posted by: ProAmerica at 04/07/2010 03:05:13 AM
How is this bill helping anyone other than the insurance compaines get richer? The people who do have insurance now are only going to see thier rates go up, plus they are now going to have to pay tax on that insurance as well. Plus let ge guess we are still going to pay for Medicare tax, and welfare and crack babies and food stamps for the mother and child? We on;y thought we couldn't afford insurance now. Great what W did for the price of Oil Oboma is going to do to health insurance.
Posted by: Donna at 04/07/2010 06:47:43 AM
What happens with the medcaid program are their any changes?
Posted by: Donna at 04/07/2010 06:53:07 AM
What about medcaid are their any changes?
Posted by: Annemarie at 04/07/2010 07:08:26 AM
My husband and I are both disabled and have to live on $1320.00 a month. He has medicare and I have a subsidized health insurance that charges the premium according to our income. The problem is this, even though I have health insurance I can't use it because the doctors charge so much ($135.00) just to walk in the door that we can't afford to pay the 20% that is our responsibility to pay. There isn't any more money that we can take from our grocery bill. We are already eating a big share of beans and top ramen. Even the basic bills just to survive have reached a point that I am unable to afford my meds for COPD and CHF and phebitis. It won't be long before they come to take my oxygen and after that...well...I suppose nature will be doing her job. I have contact the drug companies but they won't help because I have insurance. Never mind that I can't afford to use it!Needless to say I am pretty scared. I talked with my state's senior and disabled service's to see if I would qualify to get help with my meds but they said that honestly they don't know what the heck is going on with the new health reform. Isn't the new health reform have gone into gear now? If not, how long will it take? Will I be dead before it can help those of us that face the same problem?
Posted by: Mike at 04/07/2010 07:26:55 AM
Although will pay higher taxes being in the higher income bracket still support this bill. There are 2 problems - 1) Limit tort reform by putting a cap on what lawyers can collect rather than the patient 2) Not allowing illegal aliens to purchase insurance is stupid. The reason is that even uninsured, when they get sick they are still treated (for free) and you are the one paying.
Posted by: Gary MacTavish at 04/07/2010 12:05:42 PM
How about answering this question. I'm a 24 year old high school drop out. I don't work but prefer to 'hang' with my friends. I do a little private business selling street drugs. I pretty much live with my parents who don't have jobs either. We live in subsidized housing and get by on food stamps, AFDC for my younger half brothers and sisters, energy assistance, ride subsidized public transportation and frequent food shelves. As I understand the new health care program, my7 parents will be getting subsidized health care since they are low 'income'. My question is this; How long can I 'hang' with them on their health care program before I get my own subsidy? Are there going to be any requirements that I have to show proof that I am doing anything to take care of myself? Since it is a federal program are there going to be loopholes for me to get through to stay on the program without anyone checking on me? Please answer these questions instead of the 'what they would like to hear so they will support this desecration of our countries work ethic.
Posted by: juls at 04/07/2010 12:49:00 PM
I have to scramble to get my patients some way to pay for their medications before I discharge them from the hospital I work at. It's truly a nightmare when they do have insurance, but not enough coverage to where they still pay outrageous out of pocket expenses. Many times my hands are tied and much of the responsibility still remains with the patient in obtaining healthcare treatments on their own. The only thing I can recommend at this time is court reform and the public practicing preventative healthcare.
Posted by: Jay at 04/07/2010 01:22:48 PM
I have a job that supplies paid heath care, but if I read it right, they already pay tax on that and if it has to be on my w-2 that means i will be taxed more for a benefit from my job. Cash for clunkers, bail everyone out, raise prices on everything to cover the communist in office plan, I guess pretty soon we will be working and homeless to give to the government, I mean how much more can he take, ya he was a real good choice, the only ones benefiting from this are the lazy don't want to work people, and were loosing because of them. Ya give give give, it was said not what your country can do for you, they are doing nothing for the working class but stealing from us, this from a guy who is so proud to be an American he wont even prove he is, something to be proud of, true Americans should hang their heads in shame, I do.
Posted by: Erlene Harris at 04/07/2010 01:32:55 PM
I think the whole bunch on capital hill including the worst president I have ever had the displeasure of seeing in office should be KICKED OUT for this We have enough taxes and I have private insurance that I will not get rid of because of some ... lawmaker WE AS A VOTING PUBLIC HAD NO SAY SO IN THIS AT ALL!!!!!!!
Posted by: Steve at 04/07/2010 01:38:11 PM
I'm a army veteran and I receive my medical coverage from the VA. Will I be required to purchase additional health insurance even though the federal government is required to provide my medical coverage for life? I turn 65 in 2012 and am available for medicare. Which plan do I fall under? Is one primary and one secondary?
Posted by: Steve Landon at 04/07/2010 02:31:46 PM
My company, AT&T, provides a Long Term Health Care plan through John Hancock. Several years ago, my wife applied for this coverage but was turned down due to a pre-existing illness. Will this new law allow her to get this insurance now?
Posted by: Stan at 04/07/2010 09:33:27 PM
You said that as a result of the legislation the cost of employer provided health coverage would not increase but the value of the benefit will be added to W-2s and that I assume means it becomes taxable income. Sounds like an increase to me.
Posted by: joe s. at 04/07/2010 11:52:23 PM
Yeah, the bill is going to increase taxes on the rich, good. And business will have to pay fees or whatever, good too, but they will also get generous help from the gov't. I don't forsee the bill cutting costs or even holding current levels in place. The main point was to expand coverage, which is admirable. However, this is classic liberal policy: help the poor and destitute. What about the middle class who is diminishing because of many reasons, especially health care costs? The middle is sinking in most cases and barely anyone is getting rich in this tough enviornment. Obama should have stuck with what he said during his campainging: a single payer system. Here the gov't could substantially control costs by telling private hospitals and workers what they'll receive for pay. There, problem solved. Too bad most people are ignorant of the benefits of single payer or even socialized health care (like Britain's). Obama's bill will be another costly and poor performing liberal policy.
Posted by: Dan Chicago South Side at 04/09/2010 01:05:17 AM
Kiplinger censoring propoganda for the 'Regime'? My polite post as to the power grab was not posted. No names used, no cuss or even slang. Just a reference to what is going on, using health care as a guise for more Dem power and government dependency.
Posted by: Bob S at 04/11/2010 09:34:04 PM
My employer has a good health plan. Will I have to pay more? Your answer to this question was incomplete to say the least and deceptive to say the worst. The fact is, thanks to section 9002, beginning in January, employer provided health care WILL cause everyone to pay more, whether they use it or not. IT'S BEING ADDED TO OUR INCOME TAX BASE. The Federal Government is looking at realizing 212 billion dollars next year and every year after that from this addition. That's an average of $40 per week or $2,000 per year additional income tax per worker. In addition, there's a "fairness" issue involved, because with group insurance, the employer pays the same for each person in the group. It doesn't matter if you are single or married with children the employer pays the same premium. This means that single people will be responsible for more tax than they should pay, while married with children will be responsible for less. In most cases, singles would pay less for insurance outside the group, but without them, the group wouldn't work. Noone minds that the employer pays the same rate regardless, but noone wants to pay taxes that don't belong to them. This bill is going to hurt the pocketbook of 1/3 of all Americans next year and for years to come, on behalf of 1/10th of all Americans...
Posted by: Chris at 04/21/2010 11:05:43 AM
"Im a Medicare beneficiary. Should I expect to pay more?" Yes, you should expect to pay more. When the government mandates that some benefits must be "free" you can expect that other benefits will cost more to make up the difference. Simple economics.
Posted by: Ruth at 04/21/2010 11:32:31 AM
How does the reform affect Fed & State government workers? They should be under the same plan; same rules, premiums and taxes (when applicable) as the taxpayers who are fronting this!
Posted by: janice mcain at 04/21/2010 11:36:35 AM
My hubby & I r the hard workin parents of 3 children ages:15,12,and 8.We make acombined income of around $50 grand yrly.R employeers don't offer health care coverage (cause we each work 2 part-time jobs,7 days a week 2 make r incomes)We can't afford & refuse 2 pay for health care.Plus,if we got medicade for r kids the Mich welfare office said we'd have 2 give up the following:r kids' coverdell college funds,kids' reg savings accts,both r childrens' & R's life ins benefits,R emergency savings accts,R reg savings & R Roth IRA accts,plus sell r home (was worth $200 when bought n 2004 w/ r combined lives savings,& the van we share pd cash for as well in 2005 $24 grand)We struggle 2 pay r property taxes of $12 grand a yr,& R home was sold 2 us w/ hidden fire damage that the private home inps comp passed/as did the city we live in.We both voted for Obama,& the Dem congress.How much will we as a married couple,w/ 3 kids have 2 pay in the uninsured health ins penality taxes? We refuse 2 pay for health care,can't afford it,refuse a govt hand out that'll give in one hand & reach N2 r wallets 2 take away all we've worked hard for w/ the rest!We refuse 2 give up r families savings,life ins polices,& assets for Mich govt health care!The govt giveth/the govt takeith away w/ penalities & interest! I'm 36 yrs old,my hubby's41,we've both voted Democratic since we were 18,never missed a local/state/fed election.Now come June (we both hav Jun B Days)when we renew r licences,were changing r voter ID's 2 Independent! We miss Lou Dobbs bein on CNN,& read all his bks.If he'd run 4 pres in 2012,we'd love 2 see him take office in 2013,as well as a whole new congress B4 then! Time 2 vote EVERY1 that voted 2 make Every1 pay for health ins,WE CANNOT AFFORD,...OUT of office this yr! Mike Cox for the new governor of Mich,thank God Granholm's time n office is up (she's almost as bad as Jon Engler was),plus Stabanow,Levin-As every other Dem n Mich's congress,as well as the few Repb's that voted for this Forced Health Ins Mandate Need voted OUT OF OFFICE AS WELL!Most people whom don't have health ins,don't cause they can't afford it/don't want the govt 2 take away there live savings/life ins/other assets 2 get govt health ins!No health ins comp should have the right 2 deny people w/ pre existing conditions/raise rates any more either!So called health care reform,only reform's us everyday underemployed/unemployed everyday adverage Americans,it ONLY benefits big ins companies,NOT Us!Obama & Congress should GET R MANUFACTURING JOBS BACK FROM CHINA,& R CALL CENTER JOBS BACK FROM INDIA,AND DEPORT ALL THE AHOLES THAT OUT SOURCED R advarage AMERICAN"S JOBS N THE 1ST PLACE!!! P.S. WE NOT RACIST AGAINST ANY 1 LIVING IN R COUNTRY
Posted by: radicalKansan at 04/21/2010 12:42:20 PM
PurposelyVague: Starting in 2011, companies have to provide the value of the health insurance they offer employees, but this IS NOT raguarded as taxable income.
Posted by: radicalKansan at 04/21/2010 12:43:31 PM
Pooh: You and your husband should be eligible to have your health insurance costs subsidized.
Posted by: radicalKansan at 04/21/2010 01:10:40 PM
Federalist45: How does injecting 32+ million new customers into a sector make it inherently worse? Where is your proof that health care quality is going to decrease? When comparing infant mortality rates and health outcomes (efficiency and effectiveness of care) with other developed nations, empirical data clearly demonstrates that single-payer systems are superior and cost HALF as much as our current system. This definitely falls far short of single-payer, but it's working in Mass, with the only real budgetary short-falls being caused by the recession (not the individual mandate as some claim). Additionally, illegal aliens won't even be allowed to buy insurance from the new exchanges--even if they buy using their own money. In terms of it being the single, broadest, "federal powergrab" in history--I would say it pales in comparison to the 16th amendment, but what do I know.
Posted by: Nell Browning at 04/21/2010 02:47:34 PM
I can't believe all the selfish comments. Gee I may have to pay some more tax to save hundreds of people from dying every day and millions more who need medical attention and can't get it because this RICH country doesn't care. Most all developed countries offer a form of universal health care - something we all need just like we need water, food, lights and heat to live . As one of the administrators for the plan in Switzerland said the US has the best health care in the world IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT IF YOU CAN'T IT'S JUST ANOTHER THIRD WORLD COUNTRY!!!!! I sold health insurance for years, the most heartbreaking thing I ever did.
Posted by: Mike May at 04/23/2010 09:56:36 AM
Re: Item #3 on Joan Pryde's list of 13 Tax Changes. Does the requirement to include the cost of health care coverage on each employee's W-2 mean that the amount will be included as taxable income for the employee?
Posted by: Betty at 04/29/2010 07:22:41 PM
I am unemployed and my COBRA insurance ends this June. I took early social security retirement, since I haven't found a job. Since I am under 65 years old, I do not qualify for Medicare benefits. Does Health Care Reform benefit me in any way?
Posted by: S. L. at 05/26/2010 06:12:44 PM
IS IT TRUE THAT UNDER NEW BILL, THAT I WILL BE TAXED ON ALL HEALTH BENEFITS RECEIVED!!! YOUR QULICK RESPONSE TO THIS QUESSTION IS VERY MUCH APPRECIATED. Sincerely, S.L.
Posted by: Barbara at 07/04/2010 08:42:56 AM
I am retired; have medicare & two supplemental insurance through my previous employeer and my husbands. Will we be mandated to file this as income and pay taxes on it?