I'm 60 With a $4.2 Million Nest Egg. Can I Stop Saving and Start Spending Before I Retire at 65?

Portrait of elegant older businesswoman standing in the modern studio, smiling at the camera. — (Image credit: Getty Images)

If you’re retiring with $4.2 million, you’re ahead of the game. The average retirement account balance among Americans 65 to 74 was around $609,000 as of 2022, according to Federal Reserve data.

If you use the 4% rule to manage a balance that large, you’re looking at annual withdrawals of $168,000, not accounting for any adjustments you might make for inflation. And that’s on top of whatever Social Security ends up paying you.

But it’s one thing to be retiring with $4.2. It’s another thing to be nearing retirement with that much money and a desire to finally spend your paycheck in full instead of saving a portion of it.

From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance

Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just ~~$107.88~~ $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues

CLICK FOR FREE ISSUE

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/y99mlvgqmn1763972420.png

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.

It may be that you’re 60 with $4.2 million, but you don’t want to retire until age 65 for different reasons — you enjoy your work, you like the routine, and you want to hold down a job for the health insurance until you’re eligible for Medicare.

That situation begs the question: Can you stop saving for retirement and simply leave your $4.2 million to grow for five more years? Or should you push yourself to save a little more during that final stretch?

The case for not funding your nest egg any longer

Approaching retirement with $4.2 million is quite a feat. And even if you were to start taking that money out at age 60, you’d be in a good position to stretch your nest egg as long as you need to.

If you’re not aiming to start spending that money for another five years, even better. At a conservative 4% return, a $4.2 million portfolio at 60 that remains untouched could grow into $5.1 million in five years.

Aaron Cirksena, Founder and CEO of MDRN Capital, thinks anyone in a situation like this is doing great. And he thinks it’s fine to stop saving at this point as long as you’re seeing the big picture.

“In most cases, if your retirement plan is solid and fully funded, it can make sense to loosen the reins a bit,” he explains. But he also has a few caveats.

“Inflation, healthcare costs, and tax law changes can all chip away at even a large nest egg. So before you switch from saving to spending, run the numbers on future income, expected withdrawals, and worst-case market scenarios. If the plan still holds up, then yes, you can enjoy the lifestyle you sacrificed for,” Cirksena says.

One thing he suggests is revisiting your projections annually and parking some of the “fun money” you’re no longer saving in a liquid, low-risk account.

“That way, if something shifts, you still have a buffer without tapping retirement accounts early,” he explains.

You may want to keep funding your nest egg for the tax benefits alone

While you don’t necessarily have to keep saving for retirement if you’ve accumulated $4.2 million by age 60, you should consider funding an account like a 401(k) anyway — not for the added savings, but for the tax breaks, explains Matt Hylland, Financial Planner, Investment Advisor at Arnold and Mote Wealth Management. This especially holds true if you earn a large income (which, if you have $4.2 million by age 60, may be the case).

“If you are high income, you may want to withdraw from other sources of savings to fund your increased living expenses, but still maximize pre-tax retirement savings for the tax deduction,” says Hylland.

Case in point: As Hylland explains, if you’re 50 or older, you can contribute $31,000 into a pre-tax 401(k) in 2025 and receive a deduction for that contribution. If you’re in the 32% tax bracket, that deduction is worth almost $10,000.

In a situation like this, it could be beneficial to still save in a traditional 401(k) because the tax deduction is so valuable, even if it means withdrawing more from other assets to do so, Hylland explains.

Hylland also suggests funding a 401(k) in this scenario for the employer match alone.

“If your employer offers a 401(k) match, you may still want to ensure you are saving the minimum required to get that full match,” he says. “Because that employer match is effectively a very high risk-free return on a small amount of savings, it will be worth getting that if you are able.”

Finally, Hylland says, if you’re going to increase your spending during your final few years in the workforce, make sure your retirement plan factors in those higher expenses if you anticipate retaining them going forward.

As he explains, “If you were saving $20,000 per year and spending $100,000 per year for living expenses, you may have calculated a retirement savings goal to fund $100,000 in spending in retirement. Now, if you decide to spend that $20,000 going forward, bringing your spending up to $120,000 per year, make sure you are running retirement projections with that new amount.”

A difference of $20,000 per year in retirement expenses could change your savings target, Hylland warns. And while you don’t necessarily have to keep spending at a higher rate once you stop working, as Hylland says, “That increase in lifestyle may be hard to back away from once you do retire.” For this reason, it’s important to re-run your numbers before you decide to stop saving for retirement completely.

Maurie Backman is a freelance contributor to Kiplinger. She has over a decade of experience writing about financial topics, including retirement, investing, Social Security, and real estate. She has written for USA Today, U.S. News & World Report, and Bankrate. She studied creative writing and finance at Binghamton University and merged the two disciplines to help empower consumers to make smart financial planning decisions.