I'm 52, make $210K a year and heard I may lose a 401(k) tax break in 2026. Should I max out my 401(k) anyway?
We asked financial experts for advice.
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Delivered daily
Kiplinger Today
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more delivered daily. Smart money moves start here.
Sent five days a week
Kiplinger A Step Ahead
Get practical help to make better financial decisions in your everyday life, from spending to savings on top deals.
Delivered daily
Kiplinger Closing Bell
Get today's biggest financial and investing headlines delivered to your inbox every day the U.S. stock market is open.
Sent twice a week
Kiplinger Adviser Intel
Financial pros across the country share best practices and fresh tactics to preserve and grow your wealth.
Delivered weekly
Kiplinger Tax Tips
Trim your federal and state tax bills with practical tax-planning and tax-cutting strategies.
Sent twice a week
Kiplinger Retirement Tips
Your twice-a-week guide to planning and enjoying a financially secure and richly rewarding retirement
Sent bimonthly.
Kiplinger Adviser Angle
Insights for advisers, wealth managers and other financial professionals.
Sent twice a week
Kiplinger Investing Weekly
Your twice-a-week roundup of promising stocks, funds, companies and industries you should consider, ones you should avoid, and why.
Sent weekly for six weeks
Kiplinger Invest for Retirement
Your step-by-step six-part series on how to invest for retirement, from devising a successful strategy to exactly which investments to choose.
Question: I'm 52, make $210K a year and heard I may lose a 401(k) tax break in 2026. Should I still max out my 401(k) as I had planned?
Answer: The more money you're able to sock away in your 401(k), the more financial flexibility you might enjoy in retirement. And whether you're on track with your savings or trying to make up for lost time, you may be eager to take advantage of your plan's catch-up contributions, which are available to savers ages 50 and over.
If you’re 52 years old and earning $210,000 a year, you may be in a strong position to max out your 401(k) at the catch-up level. This year, 52-year-olds (and anyone aged 50 and older) can contribute up to $31,000 to a 401(k), and that number is likely to rise in 2026 in line with inflation.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
But there’s a new rule that will apply to 401(k) catch-ups for higher earners, taking effect in 2026. And it’s a change that may leave you rethinking your plan to max out your contributions.
Higher earners lose a near-term tax break
For higher earners, traditional 401(k) catch-ups are a great way to not only build stronger nest eggs, but also capture more tax savings up front. The rules are changing in 2026.
As Jim Davis, CFP and Senior Wealth Advisor at Aspen Wealth Management, explains, “Starting in 2026, anyone earning over $145,000 who wants to make 401(k) catch-up contributions will need to put those extra dollars into a Roth account. That means paying taxes up front instead of getting the immediate deduction.”
The $145,000 threshold applies to income earned in the previous year. So if you have a $210,000 salary in 2025, it means you’ll be barred from making a pre-tax 401(k) catch-up in the new year.
It also means that if your company’s 401(k) plan doesn’t offer a Roth component, you may be barred from making catch-up contributions. However, this may only be a problem for a small percentage of savers. As of 2023, 93% of 401(k) plans had a Roth option, according to the Plan Sponsor Council of America.
There are still benefits to making 401(k) catch-ups
As a general rule of thumb, Roth contributions make sense when you expect to be in a higher tax bracket in retirement than you’re in today. It’s for this reason that higher earners often opt out of a Roth and choose to save in traditional retirement plans instead.
But just because the rules are changing with regard to catch-up contributions does not mean higher earners should forgo them. As Davis points out, with a Roth 401(k), “the money grows tax-free and withdrawals in retirement won’t be taxed.”
Brian Harrison, CFP and President at SAVVI Financial, thinks higher earners should recognize the value of getting to grow their money tax-free.
“The power of Roth contributions is something to consider, particularly as retirees are living longer,” he insists. “That tax-free growth decades down the line can make a big impact.”
Sherman Standberry, CPA and Managing Partner at My CPA Coach, agrees.
“I continue to inform high-earning clients that catch-up contributions are still a smart strategy,” he says. “Although this [change] results in higher taxable income, the trade-off is the ability to enjoy tax-free growth and withdrawals during retirement. This can create valuable tax diversification across pre-tax and Roth accounts.”
Standberry also points out that tax rates may increase in the future. Having a portion of savings in a Roth account helps protect against that.
Davis, meanwhile, points out that there may be some less obvious benefits to having money in a Roth.
"You also need to consider other moving parts in your plan," he explains. "Higher income can affect required minimum distributions, Social Security, and Medicare premiums, especially IRMAA."
A change worth embracing
The requirement for higher earners to make 401(k) catch-ups as Roth contributions might initially seem like a penalty of sorts. But Davis says they can still be useful to higher earners.
“The key is to view catch-ups as one piece of your overall plan,” he says. “How do they fit with your tax strategy, retirement income, and long-term cash flow?”
Of course, anyone who’s used to making 401(k) catch-ups on a pre-tax basis should work with a financial adviser or tax professional to adjust to this change. That could mean implementing other strategies to avoid a larger tax bill in the near term.
But that doesn’t mean higher earners should eschew 401(k) catch-ups in 2026 or beyond. At the end of the day, any money that sits and grows in a 401(k) — traditional or otherwise — gets special tax treatment, and there’s a real value in that.
As Davis says, “When used thoughtfully, catch-ups can help you save smarter — not just more — and keep more of what you’ve worked for as you move toward retirement.”
Read More
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Maurie Backman is a freelance contributor to Kiplinger. She has over a decade of experience writing about financial topics, including retirement, investing, Social Security, and real estate. She has written for USA Today, U.S. News & World Report, and Bankrate. She studied creative writing and finance at Binghamton University and merged the two disciplines to help empower consumers to make smart financial planning decisions.
-
Quiz: Do You Know How to Avoid the "Medigap Trap?"Quiz Test your basic knowledge of the "Medigap Trap" in our quick quiz.
-
5 Top Tax-Efficient Mutual Funds for Smarter InvestingMutual funds are many things, but "tax-friendly" usually isn't one of them. These are the exceptions.
-
AI Sparks Existential Crisis for Software StocksThe Kiplinger Letter Fears that SaaS subscription software could be rendered obsolete by artificial intelligence make investors jittery.
-
Quiz: Do You Know How to Avoid the 'Medigap Trap?'Quiz Test your basic knowledge of the "Medigap Trap" in our quick quiz.
-
We Retired at 62 With $6.1 Million. My Wife Wants to Make Large Donations, but I Want to Travel and Buy a Lake House.We are 62 and finally retired after decades of hard work. I see the lakehouse as an investment in our happiness.
-
Social Security Break-Even Math Is Helpful, But Don't Let It Dictate When You'll FileYour Social Security break-even age tells you how long you'd need to live for delaying to pay off, but shouldn't be the sole basis for deciding when to claim.
-
I'm a Wealth Adviser Obsessed With Mahjong: Here Are 8 Ways It Can Teach Us How to Manage Our MoneyThis increasingly popular Chinese game can teach us not only how to help manage our money but also how important it is to connect with other people.
-
Global Uncertainty Has Investors Running Scared: This Is How Advisers Can Reassure ThemHow can advisers reassure clients nervous about their plans in an increasingly complex and rapidly changing world? This conversational framework provides the key.
-
5 Ronald Reagan Quotes Retirees Should Live ByThe Nation's 40th President's wit and wisdom can help retirees navigate their financial and personal journey with confidence.
-
We're 78 and Want to Use Our 2026 RMD to Treat Our Kids and Grandkids to a Vacation. How Should We Approach This?An extended family vacation can be a fun and bonding experience if planned well. Here are tips from travel experts.
-
Should You Jump on the Roth Conversion Bandwagon? A Financial Adviser Weighs InRoth conversions are all the rage, but what works well for one household can cause financial strain for another. This is what you should consider before moving ahead.