The credit crunch and the Bear Stearns bailout have given all brokerages a black eye. The cloud of investor doubt unfairly hangs over at least one firm, Raymond James Financial.
So far, financial firms, including banks, brokers, investment banks and mortgage lenders have written down more than $150 billion in asset-backed securities because of the subprime mortgage mess. The roster includes such big names as Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley. But, so far at least, Raymond James (symbol RJF) has not marked down a penny of its assets.
The St. Petersburg, Fla., firm published detailed statistics of its lending activities on March 26. Regarding the $3.5 billion in corporate loans on Raymond James' balance sheet as of December 31, more than half of the borrowers are publicly traded companies, and nearly two-thirds of those companies generate operating income of at least $50 million a year.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
The company's residential loan portfolio is not too shabby, either. It's true that more than 75% of the firm's $2.2 billion worth of residential loans charge only interest initially, for periods of three to five years. But Raymond James's borrowers have decent credit, with average FICO scores of 747 (a score of more than 760 is considered excellent). Raymond James says the vast majority of the loans are fully documented.
The credit quality of Raymond James residential borrowers is reflected in the percentage of loans that bankers call "non-performing." That means the loans are 90 days or more past due. Raymond James had only 0.11% of its loans fit that category as of December 31. Compare that with 2.90% for Countrywide Financial, 2.07% for Citigroup and 2.17% for Washington Mutual in the same period.
Profits from bank loans to both residential and commercial borrowers are a small part of Raymond James' overall business. The company generated $247 million in net income in the 2007 calendar year, but only $27 million, or 11%, came from the bank loans.
As for its investing operations, Raymond James relies less on volatile commission revenue and more on fees generated by the $35.5 billion in client assets that the firm's subsidiaries manage. Fee-based revenue is more stable because it's less affected by market conditions than commissions.
Fees accounted for 59% of the company's $2.6 billion in net revenue for the fiscal year that ended September 30, compared with 41% from commissions and other one-time transactions. Five year ago, 60% of the company's revenue came from commissions and one-time transactions.
The Federal Reserve Board's unprecedented move to allow brokers to borrow from its discount window improves the outlook for Raymond James. "The combination of aggressive liquidity management by brokers, better than expected earnings, and most importantly, favorable monetary action by the Federal Reserve have eliminated a reasonable portion of the risk fears in the market," Wachovia analyst Douglas Sipkin says.
Insiders are scooping up shares. Thirteen company officers and three directors have bought Raymond James stock since January 1. It's usually a positive sign when officers and directors, who know more about a company than outsiders, start buying shares in droves. Moreover, the company on March 11 authorized a $75 million buyback of its stock.
The shares look relatively inexpensive. At their April close of $24.07, they trade for 12 times the $1.95 per share that analysts expect the company to earn in the current fiscal year. The average brokerage stock sells at 15 times earnings. The stock is 36% off its October 31 high of $37.60.
"On the small and midcap side, Raymond James is our favorite name," Sipkin says. He rates the stock "outperform" and says it is worth between $29 and $31.
-
Quiz: How Much Do You Know About Taxes on Social Security Benefits?Quiz Social Security benefits often come with confusing IRS tax rules that can trip up financially savvy retirees and near-retirees.
-
Are You Ready for 65? The Medicare Initial Enrollment Period QuizQuiz Turning 65 soon? Test your basic knowledge of Medicare's Initial Enrollment Period (IEP) rules in our quick quiz.
-
3 Ways to Stretch the 2026 Social Security COLA For Your BudgetThree steps retirees can take to stretch the Social Security COLA to fit their budgets.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Coca-Cola Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayEven with its reliable dividend growth and generous stock buybacks, Coca-Cola has underperformed the broad market in the long term.
-
If You Put $1,000 into Qualcomm Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You Would Have TodayQualcomm stock has been a big disappointment for truly long-term investors.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Home Depot Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayHome Depot stock has been a buy-and-hold banger for truly long-term investors.
-
What the Rich Know About Investing That You Don'tPeople like Warren Buffett become people like Warren Buffett by following basic rules and being disciplined. Here's how to accumulate real wealth.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Bank of America Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayBank of America stock has been a massive buy-and-hold bust.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Oracle Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayORCL Oracle stock has been an outstanding buy-and-hold bet for decades.
-
How to Invest for Rising Data Integrity RiskAmid a broad assault on venerable institutions, President Trump has targeted agencies responsible for data critical to markets. How should investors respond?
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Sherwin-Williams Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodaySherwin-Williams stock has clobbered the broader market by a wide margin for a long time.
