Should Warren Speak at Obama's Inauguration?
Symbols matter, sometimes a lot, so it's hard not to sympathize with the gay rights groups that are very angry over Barack Obama's choice of Rick Warren, a prominent evangelical minister, to deliver the invocation at his inauguration. Warren crossed the line when he compared gay marriage to incest and pedophilia.
- (opens in new tab)
- (opens in new tab)
- (opens in new tab)
- Newsletter sign up Newsletter
Symbols matter, sometimes a lot, so it's hard not to sympathize with the gay rights groups that are very angry over Barack Obama's choice of Rick Warren, a prominent evangelical minister, to deliver the invocation at his inauguration. Warren crossed the line when he compared gay marriage to incest and pedophilia. But I can also sympathize with what Obama is trying to do.
The media, describe the selection of Warren (opens in new tab) as a conciliatory gesture to evangelicals who opposed Obama's election. Gay rights advocates (opens in new tab) insist Obama is showing a "deep level of disrespect" to them and their cause. Some go even further, calling it a betrayal from Obama, given their support for him during the campaign. Others are riding to Warren's defense (opens in new tab), noting his many good works.
There's no question in my mind that the pick of Warren is an insult to gays, one that Obama could easily have avoided. But it was an unintentional insult and what's troubling is to see so many people react so stridently on one side or the other. I think you have to view the decision in the context of Obama's desire to change the way the people in this country talk with and listen to each other -- a change that ultimately would benefit everyone.

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Obama isn't about to adopt Warren's view of gay rights; there's no danger of that and that's not what this is about. What it is about is Obama's often-stated belief -- and he said it again today (opens in new tab) when asked about the Warren pick -- that if we are ever to make any progress in this country, we have to be willing to listen to all points of view and not pick our friends and enemies based on their positions on any one issue. Obama didn't mention it, but it so happens that Warren -- besides being a fierce opponent of gay marriage -- is also a tireless worker in the fight against poverty and against AIDS in Africa, two issues on which he and Obama can work together.
Obama won this election in large part because he promised a new kind of politics -- one in which opposing sides seek practical solutions to common problems. That can't happen if we divide the country into those who are for us or against us and listen solely to "our" side.
So while I personally feel this is a decision that Obama shouldn't have made, prompting a fight he doesn't need, I find it understandable in the context of what he's trying to do. And in the end, I can only hope that matters more.
-
-
Tax Season is Here. What to Know Before You File
The IRS is accepting tax returns for the 2023 tax season, but there are some key things to know before you file.
By Kelley R. Taylor • Published
-
6 Questions Your Financial Adviser Should be Asking
To effectively help you with your retirement strategy, a retirement professional must get a clear picture of what you have and what you need.
By Tyler Hill, Investment Adviser Representative • Published
-
The Biden Tax Plan: How the Build Back Better Act Could Affect Your Tax Bill
Politics Depending on your income, the Build Back Better Act recently passed by the House could boost or cut your future tax bills.
By Rocky Mengle • Last updated
-
Kiplinger's 2020 Election Forecast
Politics For nearly a century, The Kiplinger Letter has forecasted the outcome of presidential elections to keep readers informed of what's coming and what it means for them. Here's our call for 2020.
By The Kiplinger Washington Editors • Published
-
The 2020 Election and Your Money
Politics We’ve assessed how the presidential candidates’ stances on financial issues will affect your wallet.
By the editors of Kiplinger's Personal Finance • Published
-
5 HEROES Act Provisions with a Good Chance of Becoming Law
Politics The massive federal stimulus bill just passed by the House of Representatives is "dead on arrival" in the Senate. But a few proposals in the bill have enough bipartisan support to eventually become law.
By Rocky Mengle • Published
-
Vote by Mail: A State-by-State Guide to Absentee Ballot Voting
Politics With health authorities recommending people continue to social distance, the idea of voting by mail is becoming an increasingly hot topic.
By Rivan V. Stinson • Last updated
-
9 Ways COVID-19 Will Change the 2020 Elections
Politics The 2020 election will be like no other in history, as the COVID-19 pandemic will upend the business of politics as usual.
By Sean Lengell • Published
-
How to Run for Local Office
Politics If you’ve ever thought that you could do a better job than the elected officials currently in office, here’s how to launch a campaign—and win.
By Kaitlin Pitsker • Published
-
Ranking the Top Democratic Presidential Candidates for 2020
Politics The 2020 Democratic presidential nominating contest has attracted unprecedented interest.
By Nicole Duran • Last updated