Roth or Traditional? Seven Considerations for High Earners

"Traditional" and "Roth" are written on wooden blocks below red and blue arrows pointing in different directions. — (Image credit: Getty Images)

When it comes to retirement savings, high earners face unique challenges and opportunities. Deciding between pre-tax traditional IRAs/401(k)s and post-tax Roth IRAs/401(k)s is not a one-size-fits-all decision. A well-thought-out strategy tailored to individual circumstances can make a significant difference in retirement outcomes. There are several key considerations for you to make, and your answers can help guide your decision-making process.

Classic deductible IRA and Roth IRA contributions can be out of reach for high earners with workplace retirement plans such as a 401(k)/403b/457s. Married couples filing taxes together are ineligible for 2025 deductible IRA contributions with m odified a djusted g ross i ncomes (MAGI ) over $146,000. Roth IRA contributions ignore workplace retirement plan involvement, but those married filing jointly become ineligible with MAGI over $246,000.

Luckily, most workplace retirement plans allow employees to choose between traditional or Roth employee retirement plan contributions. According to T. Rowe Price, 93% of 401(k) plans offered Roth employee contribution options as of 2023, with 14% of participants using the feature. While participation seems low, this savings option only arrived in 2006. Traditional and Roth 401(k) contributions are not subject to any income limitations. So how do you choose?

From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance

Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just ~~$107.88~~ $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues

CLICK FOR FREE ISSUE

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/y99mlvgqmn1763972420.png

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.

1. Evaluate your current and future tax situation

One of the first questions to address is how your tax bracket today compares to your expected tax bracket in retirement.

Traditional accounts allow for tax-deferred growth, with contributions reducing taxable income today. However, required minimum distributions (RMDs) starting at age 73 if born between 1951 and 1959, and age 75 if born after 1960, could push you into a higher tax bracket in retirement. Those mandatory RMDs are taxed as ordinary income.

Roth accounts require paying taxes upfront but offer tax-free growth and withdrawals, making them attractive if you expect to be in a higher tax bracket later.

If you’re planning to retire in a lower-tax state, traditional contributions can make sense but having both traditional and Roth accounts allows flexibility depending on a year-by-year tax situation.

2. Consider your non-retirement investments

High-income households often have significant non-retirement investments that generate capital gains and income. This additional taxable income can influence the decision between Roth and traditional accounts.

Roth assets can provide a tax-free withdrawal option, complementing taxable accounts and giving you flexibility between tax-free and taxable withdrawal options in retirement.

Traditional accounts may defer taxes but could amplify the tax burden when combined with other income sources later in life.

3. Plan for RMDs and charitable giving

Traditional retirement account contributions come with ordinary income generating RMDs. Qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), or sending all or part of that RMD to charity, offers a tax-efficient way to meet RMD requirements for those charitably inclined. In contrast, Roth accounts have no RMDs during the account holder’s lifetime.

4. Think about your legacy and the next generation

The SECURE Act changed rules for most non-spouse inheritors of pre-tax/traditional retirement accounts, requiring those beneficiaries to distribute assets within a 10-year window potentially generating high ordinary income in that decade. Those inheriting Roth assets maintain the tax-free status.

5. Consider a well-timed Roth conversion

For high earners nearing retirement, Roth conversions can be a powerful tool — especially during early retirement years before claiming Social Security. These conversions allow you to “fill up” lower tax brackets gradually, avoiding a tax spike in later years. Many 401(k)/403b/457 plans allow in-plan Roth conversions also.

If pre-tax/traditional accounts make up the majority of your retirement assets, Roth conversions can help reduce future RMD and ordinary income tax obligations. When making conversions, working with a CPA will help you optimize your conversion amounts and ensure accuracy, as recharacterizations are no longer allowed as a result of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

6. Split contributions between Roth and traditional accounts

Many employer-sponsored retirement plans allow for splitting employee contributions between traditional and Roth accounts, offering flexibility. This hybrid approach provides a hedge against future tax uncertainty. Determining the right split involves assessing current income needs, legacy goals and anticipated changes to tax laws or personal circumstances.

More advanced strategies, such as backdoor Roth IRA contributions and mega-backdoor Roth IRA contributions, also exist but are outside the scope of this article.

7. Take advantage of emerging Roth opportunities

High-income households can also take advantage of the higher contribution limits for Roth 401(k)s — up to $31,000 in 2025 for participants aged 50 or older. For more on the implications of the SECURE 2.0 Act, read the post I wrote after the law was enacted, The SECURE Act New Era – Retirement & Financial Planning Reminders.

Beginning in 2026, high-income retirement plan savers over 50 years old must execute their employee deferral catch-up contribution as a Roth. Employer match contributions may increasingly see Roth designation. As federal deficits continue to increase, adoration of Roth contributions by policymakers does too. Receiving tax revenue quickly helps the budget-scoring process of proposed legislation.

Final thoughts: Plan early and remain flexible

Estimating your future bracket can be difficult. Life happens and circumstances can always change. However, for married filing jointly couples currently and expected to remain in the top federal income tax bracket of 37% at over $751,600 of income in 2025, pre-tax/traditional contributions while working likely make sense. For early career savers and those with incomes projected to rise, Roth retirement account contributions can make a lot of sense.

When deciding between Roth and traditional accounts, the right answer depends on your unique situation. Factors such as tax strategy, retirement goals, legacy planning and expected changes in income or family dynamics all play a role.

Starting the conversation early allows for thoughtful planning and flexibility to adapt as circumstances evolve. With the right approach, high earners can maximize their after-tax retirement savings and create a more secure financial future.

This article is provided for informational purposes only, represents only a summary of topics discussed, and does not represent any investment, legal, or tax advice or recommendations. Readers must evaluate their own financial circumstances and needs and are strongly recommended to consult their professional advisors prior to making any decisions about their retirement planning. Certain of the content contained herein also represents the opinions of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Any changes in current laws or regulations could lead to vastly different conclusions from those described herein.

Disclaimer

This article was written by and presents the views of our contributing adviser, not the Kiplinger editorial staff. You can check adviser records with the SEC or with FINRA.

TOPICS

Tim Kingsbury is a Veris Partner, Advisor and a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional. Based in the firm’s New York office, Tim is focused on helping clients meet their financial and impact goals. Prior to Veris, Tim worked for eight years at Wetherby Asset Management in San Francisco, most recently as a Senior Investment Associate. At Wetherby, Tim helped high-net-worth families, charitable organizations and institutions with financial planning and portfolio management, employing both impact and traditional investments.