Your 401(k) Options Just Got More Complicated: Here's What You Need to Know
Private equity, real estate and expanded annuities are now options, but they are more complex, less flexible and more expensive to own.
It's official. President Donald Trump signed an executive order that could transform your 401(k) investment options.
For the first time, complex choices such as private equity, real estate, expanded annuities and even cryptocurrency may be added to your plan's menu.
These aren't the plain-vanilla mutual funds and index funds to which most of us are accustomed. They're bigger, flashier and at least on paper, full of promise.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
But promise is one thing; reality is another. These products are generally more complicated, less flexible and often more expensive to own.
Kiplinger's Adviser Intel, formerly known as Building Wealth, is a curated network of trusted financial professionals who share expert insights on wealth building and preservation. Contributors, including fiduciary financial planners, wealth managers, CEOs and attorneys, provide actionable advice about retirement planning, estate planning, tax strategies and more. Experts are invited to contribute and do not pay to be included, so you can trust their advice is honest and valuable.
The executive order doesn't require your employer to offer them. But if they do, you'll need to be ready to navigate a very different and potentially riskier set of choices.
Why add these complicated investments to 401(k)s?
You can buy private equity, real estate funds or annuities outside your 401(k). Why the sudden push to add them to workplace retirement plans?
The pitch is simple: These investments promise the potential for higher returns than traditional stocks and bonds.
Private equity and real estate, for example, can offer access to private deals and growth opportunities not found in typical mutual funds.
Annuities, on the other hand, are marketed as a way to guarantee income in retirement — a kind of safety net for those who want steady, predictable cash flow.
However, these offerings are much harder to evaluate and even harder to escape. That makes them risky for the average saver who doesn't have a team of analysts at their side.
It's fair to ask who really benefits. The strongest push is coming from the companies that stand to profit, such as insurance firms, recordkeepers and investment managers.
These are the same entities that can charge higher fees and lock in long-term contracts with plan sponsors once these products are on the menu.
Surveys from these companies claim that savers want more choice. But the reality tells a different story: Fewer than 2% of 401(k) plans currently offer private equity or private credit, and many employers avoid adding annuities because they're complicated to explain, compare and manage over time.
The heightened risk of complexity
More investment options can sound like a win. But in retirement planning, more choice often means more homework and more ways to get tripped up.
Before you even think about investing, you'd need to understand exactly what you're buying, how it fits into your bigger retirement picture and what it's going to cost you.
These aren't mutual funds, which are relatively straightforward and easy to sell if you need cash. Private equity, for example, can be illiquid. You might have to lock up your money for years. The fees are often layered and harder to spot, which can quietly shrink your returns.
Annuities come with their own hurdles. Contracts can lock you in for a decade or more, and the terms are often so dense that even seasoned investors struggle to compare one product to another.
Even if an annuity's promise of lifetime income sounds appealing, that doesn't mean it's the right fit for your retirement goals.
Here's the bigger concern: Are employers equipped to evaluate these products in the first place?
As fiduciaries, 401(k) plan sponsors are supposed to act in participants' best interests. But many lack the expertise to dig into these complex investments, monitor them over time and make sure they truly belong in your plan.
How will you make informed decisions?
It's important to remember that you already have ways to access these investments without complicating your 401(k).
If you have a Roth 401(k), you can take tax-free withdrawals after age 59½.
With a traditional 401(k), you might qualify for an in-service withdrawal after 59½, which lets you roll funds into an IRA.
Even if your employer decides to add these investment options to your 401(k), you're the one who must decide whether to use them.
Plan providers can explain how an option works, but they're not looking at your full financial picture, including your tax situation, your spouse's benefits, your other investments or your retirement goals. Their job is to educate, not advise.
That's why it's worth thinking about how you'll evaluate any new choices that appear in your plan.
Looking for expert tips to grow and preserve your wealth? Sign up for Building Wealth (soon to be called Adviser Intel), our free, twice-weekly newsletter.
In some cases, you might decide it's better to keep things simple. In others, you might choose to move part of your savings outside the plan through an IRA rollover or in-service withdrawal after age 59½.
An IRA typically offers a broader range of investments, including private equity and annuities, on your terms, not your employer's.
This way, you get more control over your retirement dollars without adding unnecessary complexity to your workplace plan.
The point isn't to say "no" to every new feature. It's to make sure you understand exactly how it fits into your strategy before you say "yes."
Proceed with caution
Just because something shows up on your 401(k) menu doesn't mean it belongs on your plate.
Private equity, real estate and annuities can have a place in some retirement plans, but they're not a free upgrade. They come with trade-offs in cost, flexibility and transparency that you need to weigh carefully.
Saving for retirement is a long game. It's easy to get distracted by what's new and shiny, especially when it's framed as an "opportunity."
But your 401(k) should always be built around your goals, your timeline and your comfort with risk, not whatever product just became available.
If you're unsure, this is the time to get a second opinion. Talk to a fee-only fiduciary adviser. That's someone who works for you, not for the companies selling these products. You get advice without the sales pitch or hidden agenda.
The executive order might expand what's possible in a 401(k). Whether that's good for your retirement depends entirely on how, and if, you choose to use it.
Related Content
- Your 401(k) is Changing: Trump Opens the Door to Private Assets, Cryptocurrency
- The 401(k) Shake-Up: Private Equity's Role and Risks
- Should You Add an Annuity to Your Retirement Portfolio?
- I'm a Personal Finance Expert: Here's the Truth About Using AI to Plan Your Retirement
- Five Things I Wish I'd Known Before I Retired
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

With more than 25 years in investor advocacy, Pam Krueger is the founder and CEO of Wealthramp, an SEC-registered adviser matching platform that connects consumers with rigorously vetted and qualified fee-only financial advisers. She is also the creator and co-host of the award-winning MoneyTrack investor-education TV series, seen nationally on PBS, and Friends Talk Money podcast.
-
Flashback Finance: The Cost of Retiring the Year You Were BornJust like groceries, gas and home prices, the cost of retiring is subject to inflation. Here is a look at what it cost to retire in the year you were born.
-
How One Hospital Visit Overseas Could Wreck Your FinancesProper planning can give you peace of mind and protection, regardless of what happens on your trips.
-
It's Time to Rethink What 'Aging Well' MeansDon’t fall into the trap of thinking there is a "right way" to age. Here's how to reframe aging in a healthy, achievable way.
-
Flashback Finance: The Cost of Retiring the Year You Were BornJust like groceries, gas and home prices, the cost of retiring is subject to inflation. Here is a look at what it cost to retire in the year you were born.
-
It's Time to Rethink What 'Aging Well' MeansDon’t fall into the trap of thinking there is a "right way" to age. Here's how to reframe aging in a healthy, achievable way.
-
Your Guide to Financial Stability as a Military Spouse, Courtesy of a Financial PlannerThese practical resources and benefits can help military spouses with managing a budget, tax and retirement planning, as well as supporting their own career
-
3 Steps to Keep Your Digital Data Safe, Courtesy of a Financial PlannerAs data breaches and cyberattacks increase, it's vital to maintain good data hygiene and reduce your personal information footprint. Find out how.
-
Here's Why You Can Afford to Ignore College Sticker PricesCollege tuition fees can seem prohibitive, but don't let advertised prices stop you from applying. Instead, focus on net costs after grants and scholarships.
-
S&P 500 Tops 7,000, Fed Pauses Rate Cuts: Stock Market TodayInvestors, traders and speculators will probably have to wait until after Jerome Powell steps down for the next Fed rate cut.
-
The New Average Divorce Rate By Age: Are You in the Risk Zone?While the overall divorce rate has seen a small but steady decline, gray divorces have been on the rise since the 1990s.
-
We Retired at 70 With $4.3 Million. My Wife Won't Spend 'Our Grandkids' Inheritance,' but I Want to Travel.I want to travel while we are still healthy, but my wife wants to pass down our wealth. Who is right?