What the Oil Market Is Telling Us Right Now About Energy and Gas Prices
There's no let-up in demand for oil and gas, so what happens if the war in Iran continues to constrain supplies? Consumers and investors should take note.
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
If you want to understand where oil prices are headed, you have to start with the basics: Supply and demand still rule this business.
For all the headlines, all the politics and all the short-term noise, the energy market eventually comes back to one thing: How much oil the world needs vs how much oil the world can bring to market.
Right now, that balance is a lot tighter than many people want to admit. The U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) March 2026 outlook still shows U.S. crude production averaging 13.6 million barrels per day this year and 13.8 million barrels per day in 2027.
Article continues belowFrom just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
That is strong production, but the same outlook also makes it clear that prices remain highly sensitive to disruptions tied to the Middle East and the Strait of Hormuz.
That is why I keep coming back to the same point: Prices today look lower than they probably should if you were pricing this market strictly on physical risk.
We have had war in a critical energy region, threats to major shipping routes, emergency stock releases and governments doing everything they can to keep consumers from feeling the full force of supply disruption.
Emergency barrels only buy time
Those kinds of moves can soften prices in the short run. But let's be honest, emergency barrels are not the same thing as durable new production. They buy time. They do not solve the long-term supply problem.
About Adviser Intel
The author of this article is a participant in Kiplinger's Adviser Intel program, a curated network of trusted financial professionals who share expert insights on wealth building and preservation. Contributors, including fiduciary financial planners, wealth managers, CEOs and attorneys, provide actionable advice about retirement planning, estate planning, tax strategies and more. Experts are invited to contribute and do not pay to be included, so you can trust their advice is honest and valuable.
Reuters has reported that Japan has already asked the International Energy Agency (IEA) to consider another coordinated release of oil stockpiles, on top of a previously agreed 400-million-barrel release earlier in March.
So, are prices artificially lower right now? I would say they are being restrained. That is different from saying the market is broken.
It means prices are being held back by intervention, softer economic expectations and the hope that disruptions will ease before inventories tighten too much.
At the same time, U.S. production remains strong enough to keep a lid on just how far prices can run in the near term. That combination helps explain why the market has not gone even higher.
Demand is not going anywhere
But none of that changes the bigger story. Demand is not going anywhere. We may not see peak oil demand for a long time. The world still runs on oil and gas, and that is not changing any time soon.
Emerging markets are growing. Populations are expanding. Industrial activity still depends on hydrocarbons. Transportation, petrochemicals, aviation, shipping, manufacturing, AI and power generation all continue to require enormous amounts of energy.
Even when growth slows, the base level of demand remains massive. The IEA estimates that global oil demand is running at about 104 million to 105 million barrels per day.
That is the part of the conversation too many people miss. You can talk about energy transition all day long, but the reality is that oil demand has remained far more resilient than many forecasts suggested.
Demand may shift. It may grow faster in some regions than others. It may pause during economic slowdowns. But the idea that oil demand is about to disappear, or that peak demand is right around the corner, is not what the market is showing us.
What if Middle East supply becomes unreliable?
Now, one of the biggest questions in this market is what happens when major import-dependent countries in Asia can no longer count on steady Middle East supply. That is where this story becomes even more important.
The Strait of Hormuz is not some side route. The EIA says roughly 20 million barrels per day moved through Hormuz in 2024, equal to about 20% of global petroleum liquids consumption. That means any serious disruption there immediately pressures countries such as India, China, Japan and others that rely heavily on imported crude.
And we are already seeing signs of that shift. There are reports that India, the world's third-largest oil importer, previously relied on the Middle East for more than 40% of its oil, but is now offsetting shortfalls with supplies from more than 41 sources, especially from the Western Hemisphere, while also leaning on a temporary U.S. waiver to increase Russian imports.
Japan has moved to release stockpiles and asked for additional coordinated reserve action.
Thailand, Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia and Sri Lanka are lining up for Russian crude as normal trade flows are disrupted.
In other words, the scramble for reliable barrels is already underway.
A hunt for secure, deliverable barrels
A prolonged disruption could push prices much higher and force buyers to compete aggressively for replacement supply. Barclays reportedly said that if the Strait of Hormuz disruption is prolonged, the market could lose 13 million to 14 million barrels per day of supply.
That is the type of shock that can reprice oil very quickly and make buyers in Asia willing to pay up for secure, deliverable barrels.
That creates a stronger long-term argument for U.S. oil. Countries that feel they cannot depend on Middle East barrels during geopolitical shocks will increasingly value supply coming from places they view as more dependable.
That does not mean every displaced barrel automatically shifts to the U.S., but it does mean U.S. crude becomes more strategically important when reliability matters as much as price.
India's move toward more diversified sourcing and Western Hemisphere barrels is one example of that logic already showing up in the real world.
The next question everybody asks is whether U.S. production can cover a shortage like this. The honest answer is: Not fully.
Yes, the U.S. is producing a lot of oil, and that production matters. But if the world is consuming roughly 104 million to 105 million barrels per day, and a prolonged Hormuz event removes 13 million to 14 million barrels per day from the market, the U.S. cannot simply replace all of that overnight.
It can help cushion the blow. It can provide needed incremental barrels. But it is not a one-for-one substitute for a major Middle East outage.
No magic solution
There is another reality investors need to understand. Higher prices do not instantly translate into unlimited new U.S. supply. The latest Dallas Fed energy survey reports that many oil executives are still hesitant to materially expand drilling because of volatility and uncertainty, even with prices well above profitability thresholds. That means the U.S. remains a critical stabilizer, but not a magic solution.
The next question everybody asks is: What happens to prices after the war is over?
The honest answer is that prices probably will come down from panic levels, but they will not necessarily collapse. If shipping lanes reopen, infrastructure risk eases and some of the geopolitical premium comes out of the market, oil should pull back.
The EIA's March 2026 outlook says WTI should average about $73.61 per barrel this year and about $60.81 in 2027. In other words, peace would likely remove some fear premium, but it would not erase the underlying global need for reliable supply.
We still need more, dependable production
And that gets to the bigger issue: The world still needs more dependable production than many people are willing to admit. Even if demand growth moderates, global consumption remains enormous.
That means the market can stay tighter than expected, especially when supply is vulnerable to underinvestment, geopolitics and operational disruptions.
Looking for expert tips to grow and preserve your wealth? Sign up for Adviser Intel, our free, twice-weekly newsletter.
Now, are today's prices in line with President Joe Biden-era prices? It depends on whether you are talking about crude oil or what drivers pay at the pump.
On crude, today's environment is comparable to higher-price periods we saw earlier in this decade.
On March 30, it was reported that Brent rose above $110 per barrel and WTI climbed above $105 as investors reacted to fears of prolonged disruption around the Strait of Hormuz. That tells you the market still responds very quickly when physical supply is at risk.
A different story
On gasoline, the story looks different. Earlier this year, U.S. regular gasoline averaged $2.81 per gallon in January and $2.91 in February. But the national weekly average then moved sharply higher, reaching $3.50 on March 9, $3.72 on March 16 and $3.96 on March 23.
Even so, the broader context matters: Regular gasoline averaged about $3.94 in 2022, $3.51 in 2023, $3.30 in 2024 and $3.10 in 2025. So, while drivers are feeling more pressure now than they were at the start of this year, the pump is still telling a different story than crude over the full Biden-era comparison.
My view is simple. The market is still underestimating how fragile supply really is, and it may also be underestimating how durable demand remains.
Yes, prices may ease when the war ends. But unless the world suddenly finds a lot more dependable production, I do not believe lower prices will be permanent. We can release reserves. We can talk down the market. We can hope demand growth cools for some time. But in the end, supply and demand always get the last word.
That is why I believe energy investors need to stay focused on fundamentals, not just headlines. Because when the noise clears, the same truth remains. Demand is still here, peak demand may be much further away than people think, and if supply stays constrained, prices eventually will move higher.
And if the world's largest importers come away from this crisis believing Middle East supply is less dependable than they once assumed, that only strengthens the strategic case for U.S. energy in the years ahead.
Related Content
- The Best Energy Stocks to Buy as Oil Prices Spike
- Tax Advantages of Oil and Gas Investments: What You Need to Know
- Who Controls Gas Prices in the US?
- 5 Mistakes to Avoid in Oil and Gas Investing (Plus, 6 Ways to Stay Focused)
- How Oil and Gas Investing Can Stabilize Returns and Shield Against Market Volatility: Tips From a Financial Pro
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Jay Young is the Founder and CEO of King Operating Corporation, headquartered in Addison, Texas. Jay earned his Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) degree from Angelo State University. His journey started with various roles that eventually led to the establishment of King Operating Corporation in October 1996. Prior to establishing King, Jay gained experience with roles in both finance and the oil and gas industry. He served as Vice President and a Registered Representative of Texakoma Financial, Inc., worked with stocks and commodities as a Vice President at Dillon Gage and traded stocks at World Market Equities.