People love rankings, whether they involve college basketball, universities or the best places to live. Rarely do consumers dig deeper to determine the criteria behind the rankings.
One of the findings of behavioral finance is that humans love shortcuts, given all the decisions we face day in and day out. Rankings provide just such a shortcut, and most consumers assume that such rankings are independent, objective and properly vetted.
I recently stumbled upon a financial website that provides a bevy of personal finance content to consumers; everything from taxes, credit cards, banking and investing. For the most part, their content is educational in nature and sound. However, the website also provides “rankings” of financial advisers.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Their site includes a ranking of “top financial advisory firms” for nearly 50 markets across the country. According to the site, they’ve “devoted dozens of hours to researching all of the firms” in the area and listed only those that are “fiduciary firms,” which means they are required to act in their clients’ best interest. I believe this site, and others like it, too often are simply revenue generators and lack adequate disclosure and transparency.
It turns out that the firms listed as “top financial advisory firms” paid to be on the list, which is not disclosed anywhere on the website. The only way I discovered this was by contacting the entity to determine how I might be included in the listing. Most consumers would have no idea of knowing that this “best list” requires firms to “pay to play.”
So how should consumers use rankings, if it all, in considering a financial adviser?
Here are some tips that may help:
Who produced the list? Lists that are from publications noted for journalistic integrity are likely to be more robust than those created by an entity you’ve never heard of.
What are the rankings criteria? There are a multitude of metrics that can be used for ranking purposes. Most use a quantitative metric like growth of assets under management or assets per adviser. Some rankings require firms to be of a certain size to even be considered. Make sure you look beyond the numbers to see what factors were used.
What are you seeking in an adviser? Not everything that counts can be measured. For consumers focused on finding an adviser who provides financial planning, which is more qualitative than quantitative, rankings often offer little insight.
Every client is different, and as a result, most adviser rankings offer little in the way to accurately assess how a prospective client might benefit from working with the adviser. Perhaps the best starting points are the helpful checklists both the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (NAPFA) and the CFP Board offer consumers.
At the end of the day, the only ranking that really matters is your personal satisfaction with your adviser.
-
What Services Are Open During the Government Shutdown?The Kiplinger Letter As the shutdown drags on, many basic federal services will increasingly be affected.
-
From Camping to Boating: Here's How to Stay Connected Off-GridThere's nothing quite like the peace of off-road adventures. However, ensure you have a stable connection in case you need it.
-
Ten Ways Family Offices Can Build Resilience in a Volatile WorldFamily offices are shifting their global investment priorities and goals in the face of uncertainty, volatile markets and the influence of younger generations.
-
I'm a Wealth Adviser: These Are the Pros and Cons of Alternative Investments in Workplace Retirement AccountsWhile alternatives offer diversification and higher potential returns, including them in your workplace retirement plan would require careful consideration.
-
The Rubber Duck Rule of Retirement Tax PlanningRetirement Taxes How can you identify gaps and hidden assumptions in your tax plan for retirement? The solution may be stranger than you think.
-
I'm a Financial Planner: If You're Within 10 Years of Retiring, Do This TodayDon't want to run out of money in retirement? You need a retirement plan that accounts for income, market risk, taxes and more. Don't regret putting it off.
-
Five Keys to Retirement Happiness That Have Nothing to Do With MoneyConsider how your housing needs will change, what you'll do with your time, maintaining social connections and keeping mentally and physically fit.
-
Treat Home Equity Like Other Investments in Your Retirement Plan: Look at Its Track RecordHomeowners who are considering using home equity in their retirement plan can analyze it like they do their other investments. Here's how.
-
Financial Fact vs Fiction: The Truth About Social Security Entitlement (and Reverse Mortgages' Bad Rap)Despite the 'entitlement' moniker, Social Security and Medicare are both benefits that workers earn. And reverse mortgages can be a strategic tool for certain people. Plus, we're setting the record straight on three other myths.
-
Medicare Open Enrollment: Why You Need to Pay Extra Attention to Part D, From a Financial AdviserThe lowest premium for prescription drug coverage might not actually save you the most money. Make sure you take copays into consideration and do the math.
