Get on Board with Expeditors
The freight handler and logistics company had a weak quarter, but the stock is still a keeper.
Shipping and logistics company Expeditors International of Washington has been a marvelous growth stock for so long it's odd to watch its shares flounder. The stock (symbol EXPD) closed at $41.84 on March 5, not far above its 18-month low and well below its 52-week high of $53.34 reached in November 2007.
This stock still is worth considering if you're searching for a mid-sized global growth company because Expeditors is gaining market share and analysts expect excellent earnings growth.
Expeditors shares sank 8% after the company, on February 12, reported earnings per share that missed analysts' expectations. In the fourth quarter of 2007, Expeditors earned $70 million, or 32 cents a share, up from $62 million, or 28 cents a share, a year earlier. Analysts, on average, expected earnings of 34 cents a share. The explanation for the slower-than-expected growth: high fuel costs and tighter profit margins on air freight shipments.

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Expeditors remains an excellent company in a vital and growing segment of the shipping business. It buys air and sea cargo space and insures and stores the raw materials, apparel, drugs and countless other items that go from factory to warehouse to buyer. It also produces software for the global logistics industry.
Expeditors is especially well known for its strong position in Asian trade. Almost half of its operating income of $423.4 million in 2007 resulted from business in the Far East.
That's one reason analysts are still solidly behind the company. Mike Roarke, an analyst at McAdams Wright Ragen, a brokerage firm in Expeditors' hometown of Seattle, cited the company's Chinese connections when he upgraded the stock to "buy" in February, with a price target of $50 per share.
UBS analyst Rick Paterson also upgraded EXPD to "buy" on March 3, saying in a report that market share gains should keep earnings per share growth healthy, unless the world economy turns into a disaster.
And on February 13, Expeditors director Michael Malone bought 20,000 shares at $40, a heavy bet from the inside on a recovery.
Expeditors does have a strong balance sheet, with $575 million in cash, or $2.70 per share, and no long-term debt. And it's reassuring that orders and revenue were healthy in the fourth quarter although the earnings weren't robust. "All the miss (on earnings) was related to higher costs, as gross and net revenue were generally in line (with expectations)," Edward Wolfe of Bear Sterns said in a research note.
Even some investors who sold the stock recently have good things to say about the company. J. Bary Morgan, manager of Baird LargeCap and MidCap funds, unloaded it last December at $45 as part of an overall plan to make the funds less sensitive to a slower economy. Morgan says he continues to monitor Expeditors and calls it a company "we want to own" when the economy expands again.
Don't expect Expeditors to cut costs and shrink its way to prosperity. At Expeditors' Seattle headquarters, the word "recession" is banned by order of chief executive Peter Rose, a blunt, hard-driven man from Montreal who never completed high school. Rose started his career on the Canadian Pacific railroad while a teenager and worked his way up in the transportation industry. In 1981, Rose and several partners started Expeditors, which has grown to employ 11,000 people at 230 locations on six continents.
Rose says he wants Expeditors to generate earnings growth of 15% to 20% annually -- a goal analysts say is realistic, at least through 2013. (The company's earnings per share has grown, on average, 21% each year for the past ten years.) The stock trades at 29 times the $1.44 per share analysts expect the company to earn in 2008. Expeditors's price-earnings ratio usually is around 35.
Rose has said Expeditors is the only stock he owns. Talk about placing all your eggs in one shipping container.
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
-
The Retirement Bucket Rule: Your Guide to Fear-Free Spending
Forget market declines or rising inflation. With this strategy, you won’t have to worry about any of that during retirement.
-
How Big Will the Fed Rate Cut Be This Fall?
A dismal July jobs report has lifted expectations for fall rate cuts. But just how low could the fed funds rate be by year's end?
-
How to Invest for a Fall Interest Rate Cut by the Fed
A lot can happen between now and then, but the probability the Fed cuts interest rates in September is back above 80%.
-
Are Buffett and Berkshire About to Bail on Kraft Heinz Stock?
Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway own a lot of Kraft Heinz stock, so what happens when they decide to sell KHC?
-
How the Stock Market Performed in the First 6 Months of Trump's Second Term
Six months after President Donald Trump's inauguration, take a look at how the stock market has performed.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Berkshire Hathaway Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have Today
Berkshire Hathaway is a long-time market beater, but the easy money in BRK.B has already been made.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Procter & Gamble Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have Today
Procter & Gamble stock is a dependable dividend grower, but a disappointing long-term holding.
-
My Three-Day Rule for Investing: And If it Applies Now
Stock Market I've seen a lot in my career. Here's what I see now in the stock market.
-
Is It Time to Invest in Europe?
Stock Market Europe is being shaken out of its lethargy, militarily and otherwise, by Donald Trump's changes in U.S. policy. Should investors start buying?
-
Fed Leaves Rates Unchanged: What the Experts Are Saying
Federal Reserve As widely expected, the Federal Open Market Committee took a 'wait-and-see' approach toward borrowing costs.