How Much Are You Paying for Your Portfolio?
The difference between an expense ratio of 0.66% and 0.08% may not sound like much, but it can easily mean thousands of dollars lost to fees and expenses over the course of a decade.
The greatest value financial advisers offer is the quality of their advice, the way they help their clients manage their emotions and their investment intelligence. Their next greatest value? Helping to reduce internal investment costs without negatively impacting portfolio returns.
Over the past 20 years the financial services industry has experienced a boom in product innovation. Many of these developments provide investors with the ability to greatly improve their long-term performance simply by cutting underlying investment costs. For instance, if you own a large-cap U.S. stock mutual fund, odds are you are paying roughly 1% in internal expenses plus hidden trading costs for the fund … and you may be subject to considerable dividend and capital gains distributions, further reducing your net after-tax return. If, however, you owned any one of the large-cap ETFs (exchange traded funds) that has similar holdings and portfolio characteristics, you would be cutting your internal expenses by over 0.75% while essentially owning the same portfolio.
For illustration purposes, take the Growth Fund of America (ticker: AGTHX), which has over $162 billion in assets and a very reasonable 0.66% expense ratio. This is a solid fund with a decent track record and a terrific investment for smaller accounts (below $50,000) where trading costs and other outside factors can greatly impact performance. Comparing this fund to the iShares S&P US Growth ETF (ticker: IUSG), the informed investor will quickly notice that its 0.05% expense ratio represents a much better value and significant cost savings.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Both investments have similar return, risk and volatility patterns, which is why I chose to compare them. However, over time – say the past 10 years – the difference in expense ratios compounds significantly, costing the investor thousands of dollars. In this example, the 61 basis points savings in expenses compounded at the net return of 7% by the Growth Fund of America over a decade (according to Morningstar data) for a $100,000 investment amounts to over $13,000 in additional net returns for the investor.
As a financial professional with over 20 years portfolio management experience I have learned that there are very good reasons to own all sorts of products to implement your investment strategy. And while there are bound to be times when selecting a higher-cost investment makes absolute sense (variable annuities immediately come to mind), generally speaking investors are well served to research and select lower-cost investments.
This column is the fourth in a six-part series on investor education.
- Column 1 – Understanding your goals
- Column 2 – Why benchmarking to the S&P 500 is not a good strategy
- Column 3 – Investors: Focus on Cash Flow, Not Returns
- Column 4 – How much are you paying for your portfolio?
- Column 5 – 5 critical questions to ask your financial advisor
- Column 6 – ‘Senior Inflation’ the not so silent retirement killer
-
What to Do When You Bank Lowers Your APYWhy banks lower APYs, options you can explore when it happens and whether more rate cuts are on the horizon.
-
Forget Financial Forecasts: Focus on These 3 Goals for SuccessWe know the economy is unpredictable and markets will do what they do, no matter who predicts what. Here's how to focus on what you can control.
-
Why In-Person Financial Guidance Remains the Gold StandardFace-to-face conversations between advisers and clients provide the human touch that encourages accountability and a real connection.
-
I'm a Wealth Planner: Forget 2026 Market Forecasts and Focus on These 3 Goals for Financial Success
We know the economy is unpredictable and markets will do what they do, no matter who predicts what. Here's how to focus on what you can control.
-
I'm a Financial Adviser: Why In-Person Financial Guidance Remains the Gold Standard
Face-to-face conversations between advisers and clients provide the human touch that encourages accountability and a real connection.
-
This Is How You Can Turn Your Home Equity Into a Retirement BufferIf you're one of the many homeowners who has the bulk of your net worth tied up in your home equity, you might consider using that equity as a planning tool.
-
Feeling Too Guilty to Spend in Retirement? You Really Need to Get Over ThatAre you living below your means in retirement because you fear not having enough to leave to your kids? Here's how to get over that.
-
Strategies for Women to Maximize Social Security BenefitsWomen often are paid less than men and live longer, so it's critical that they know their Social Security options to ensure they claim what they're entitled to.
-
This Is How Early Retirement Losses Can Dump You Into Financial Quicksand (Plus, Tips to Stay on Solid Ground)Sequence of returns — experiencing losses early on — can quickly deplete your savings, highlighting the need for strategies that prioritize income stability.
-
How an Elder Law Attorney Can Help Protect Your Aging Parents From Financial MistakesIf you are worried about older family members or friends whose financial judgment is raising red flags, help is out there — from an elder law attorney.
-
Q4 2025 Post-Mortem From an Investment Adviser: A Year of Resilience as Gold Shines and the U.S. Dollar DivesFinancial pro Prem Patel shares his take on how markets performed in the fourth quarter of 2025, with an eye toward what investors should keep in mind for 2026.
