Get Real: Benchmarking to the S&P 500 isn’t a Good Strategy
Trying to beat the Standard & Poor’s could lead investors down a path of failed expectations and excessive risk.


Study after study has shown that beating the S&P 500 is over the long-term is nearly impossible. Yet, nearly every time I meet with a new investor, they ask the question, “How have you done against the market (S&P 500)?”
My reply is generally something along the lines of “is that what you’re looking for?” and their answer is either a look of confusion or a resounding “yes.” However, in further conversation, investors come to understand that this is the wrong question. It inevitably will lead them down a path of failed expectations and missed goals (in my previous column I detailed the importance of setting and understanding your goals).
Beating the S&P 500 sounds great, but it does little to help investors gain peace of mind. Moreover it may also be impractical and require taking on risks that are unacceptable to you.

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
You don’t have to look back far, 2008-09 is less than a decade behind us. If your portfolio lost 35% in 2008 and gained 3% in 2011, you beat the S&P in both years, so what? Neither seems an attractive return to me.
For the decade ending 2009 the S&P was flat, hardly impressive; and for the period between Dec. 31, 2009, and May 31, 2017, the index returned just over 26% annualized. While the latter is impressive, if you walked into my office and I told you that I have a strategy that has returned over 25% annually you’d rightfully assume that there must be incredible risks associated with this strategy.
My point is simply that benchmarking your goals and expectations to the S&P 500 or any other index is silly and impractical.
Instead of heedlessly chasing the S&P, investors should:
- Take account of their goals.
- Evaluate the costs associated with reaching these goals.
- Task their investment adviser with developing a plan that is likely to achieve these goals with the least amount of risk possible.
This column is the second in a six-part series. In my next column I will detail the importance of focusing on cash-flow generation from your portfolio instead of focusing on your expected investment returns, especially in retirement.
- Column 1: Understanding your goals
- Column 2: Why benchmarking to the S&P 500 is not a good strategy
- Column 3: It’s about cash-flow, not returns
- Column 4: How much are you paying for your portfolio?
- Column 5: 5 critical questions to ask your financial adviser
- Column 6: ‘Senior Inflation’ the not so silent retirement killer
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Oliver Pursche is the Chief Market Strategist for Bruderman Asset Management, an SEC-registered investment advisory firm with over $1 billion in assets under management and an additional $400 million under advisement through its affiliated broker dealer, Bruderman Brothers, LLC. Pursche is a recognized authority on global affairs and investment policy, as well as a regular contributor on CNBC, Bloomberg and Fox Business. Additionally, he is a monthly contributing columnist for Forbes and Kiplinger.com, a member of the Harvard Business Review Advisory Council and a monthly participant of the NY Federal Reserve Bank Business Leaders Survey, and the author of "Immigrants: The Economic Force at our Door."
-
I'm 58 and unexpectedly inherited $650K. Does this change my retirement timeline?
We asked an expert financial adviser to weigh in.
-
Why Smart Retirees Are Ditching Traditional Financial Plans
Financial plans based purely on growth, like the 60/40 portfolio, are built for a different era. Today’s retirees need plans based on real-life risks and goals and that feature these four elements.
-
Why Smart Retirees Are Ditching Traditional Financial Plans
Financial plans based purely on growth, like the 60/40 portfolio, are built for a different era. Today’s retirees need plans based on real-life risks and goals and that feature these four elements.
-
To My Small Business: Well, I've Been Afraid of Changin', 'Cause I've Built My Life Around You
While thinking about succession planning might feel like anticipating a landslide (here's to you, Fleetwood Mac), there are strategies you can implement to manage the uncertainty and the transition.
-
Stock Market Today: S&P 500, Nasdaq Near New Highs
The S&P 500 hasn't hit a new high since February. It's been since December for the Nasdaq.
-
These Are the Key Tariff Issues to Watch in Coming Months
While they're not dominating headlines right now, tariffs are not over. Some key dates are coming up fast that could upend markets all over again.
-
Technology Unleashes the Power of Year-Round Tax-Loss Harvesting
Tech advancements have made it possible to continuously monitor and rebalance portfolios, allowing for harvesting losses throughout the year rather than just once a year.
-
The Fiduciary Firewall: An Expert's Five-Step Guide to Honest Financial Planning
Armed with education and awareness, you can avoid unethical people in the financial industry by seeking fee-only fiduciaries and sharing your knowledge with others.
-
Stock Market Today: Stocks Struggle to Sustain Gains
Mixed messages from multiple sources continue to make for a messy market for investors, traders and speculators.
-
How Private Capital Could Be the Key to Rebuilding America
Private capital investment in infrastructure could be a more efficient and effective alternative to government funding, potentially stimulating the economy during uncertain times, creating jobs and delivering projects on time and within budget.