Investor Psychology

Investors: Focus on Cash Flow, Not Returns

Investors who zero in on their portfolio’s bottom line are missing the point, and they could be pressured into making a costly mistake.

Thanks to the financial services industry, over the decades investors have been conditioned to focus on the returns their portfolios generate, more than on cash flow. The industry has emphasized returns, as they make a great sales tool for financial professionals. But that hardly helps investors (more on the problem with historical and average returns in my next column).

Of course, it is important to have positive returns, but simply focusing on this elevates what I call “sequence of returns risk.” This refers to the phenomena where portfolio returns in the early part of the investment cycle have a disproportionate impact on the long-term outcome of the portfolio – ergo, a 15% loss in year one has a compounding effect that is much greater than having a 15% lost in later years of the investment cycle.

The psychological impact of this is that it often causes investors to change their investment allocation to a more conservative mix, or worse yet sell near market lows, thereby compounding the impact of the early negative returns and making achieving their investment goals much more challenging. If, however, investors were to simply focus on cash flow, then they probably wouldn’t give in to any temptations to time the market or take corrective actions during a downtown, which is a natural part of a full market cycle.

For instance, take two identical $1 million portfolios, which are set up to distribute $50,000 annually. Investor No. 1 has the unfortunate luck of investing at the peak of the market cycle and being subjected to two negative performance years at the outset. Investor No. 2 experiences positive returns for the first two years.

YearPortfolio 1
annual return
Ending balance after
$50k distribution
YearPortfolio 2
annual return
Ending balance after
$50k distribution
1-5%$945,000110%$1,050,000
2-3%$866,650220%$1,210,000
310%$903,3153-3%$1,123,700
47%$916,5474-5%$1,017,515
5-15%$729,06557%$1,038,741
620%$824,8786-15%$832,930
71%$783,12778%$849,564
8-3%$709,6338-3%$774,077
98%$716,40497%$778,263
107%$716,552101%$736,045

Average annual return for both portfolios = 2.7%

Experience has taught me that investors like Investor No. 1 will likely become nervous, and at the very least will doubt their strategy and be tempted to sell. Both portfolios have a 10-year average annual return of 2.7%, and both distribute the desired $50,000. The ending balance between the two portfolios is about $20,000 apart, well within a reasonable margin of error for long-term investment return expectations.

Astute investors know that portfolio returns are heavily influenced by market cycles, which are uncontrollable. By focusing on cash-flow, investors are better able to ignore short-term market gyrations and sequence of returns risk. In my next column, I’ll be discussing the importance and significant impact portfolio costs have on long-term performance.

This column is the third in a six-part series on investor education.

  • Column 1 – Understanding your goals
  • Column 2 – Why benchmarking to the S&P 500 is not a good strategy
  • Column 3 – It’s about cash-flow, not returns
  • Column 4 – How much are you paying for your portfolio?
  • Column 5 – 5 critical questions to ask your financial advisor
  • Column 6 – ‘Senior Inflation’ the not so silent retirement killer

About the Author

Oliver Pursche, Investment Adviser Representative

CEO, Bruderman Asset Management

Oliver Pursche is the Chief Market Strategist for Bruderman Asset Management, an SEC-registered investment advisory firm with over $1 billion in assets under management and an additional $400 million under advisement through its affiliated broker dealer, Bruderman Brothers, LLC. Pursche is a recognized authority on global affairs and investment policy, as well as a regular contributor on CNBC, Bloomberg and Fox Business. Additionally, he is a monthly contributing columnist for Forbes and Kiplinger.com, a member of the Harvard Business Review Advisory Council and a monthly participant of the NY Federal Reserve Bank Business Leaders Survey, and the author of "Immigrants: The Economic Force at our Door."

Most Popular

Your Guide to Roth Conversions
Special Report
Tax Breaks

Your Guide to Roth Conversions

A Kiplinger Special Report
February 25, 2021
The 25 Cheapest U.S. Cities to Live In
places to live

The 25 Cheapest U.S. Cities to Live In

Take a look at our list of American cities with the lowest costs of living. Is one of the cheapest cities in the U.S. right for you?
October 13, 2021
Gen X: How to Make Sure Your Future Self Remains Funded
personal finance

Gen X: How to Make Sure Your Future Self Remains Funded

If you’re a Gen Xer, like me, now might be the right time to talk to a financial professional to learn more about how to adjust your retirement planni…
October 20, 2021

Recommended

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials Rides the Recovery
Kip ETF 20

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials Rides the Recovery

Some of the fund's best-performing stocks over the past year were regional banks with market values below $30 billion.
October 28, 2021
Is Hybrid Long-Term Care Insurance Right for You?
Long-Term Care Insurance

Is Hybrid Long-Term Care Insurance Right for You?

If you hate the idea of paying for long-term care insurance you may never use, a hybrid policy could be for you. The money you paid in premiums doesn’…
October 28, 2021
Boost Your Retirement Savings for 2022
Financial Planning

Boost Your Retirement Savings for 2022

If you were self-employed or had a side hustle in 2021, you can save even more in a tax-advantaged account.
October 26, 2021
Don't Get Too Hung Up on a Retirement Savings Number
retirement planning

Don't Get Too Hung Up on a Retirement Savings Number

There's tons of advice about how big your nest egg should be for retirement but focusing too much on a single figure can lead to complacency.
October 26, 2021