Kiplinger.com
Tools
Columns
E-mail Alerts
Online Forum
Quizzes
Site Map
The Kiplinger Letter
Kiplinger Store
Customer Service
Corporate Sales
About Kiplinger
Give A Gift

INVESTING

 | 

INSIGHTS, ANALYSIS, NEWS & TOOLS

Home > Investing > Mutual Funds > Magazine

Slideshow Videos Slideshow
FEATURED SLIDE SHOW
What Can You Buy for $300K?
We went in search of housing values using our top ten best cities for 2008 as a guide.
KIPLINGER'S MONEY POLL
The unemployment rate hit a five-year high in August. How worried are you about your job?
Very worried
Somewhat worried
Not worried
Not sure
       View Results!
UPDATE
Double-Digit Delights
An update of the performance of last year's picks.

It's been a good year for the Kiplinger 25. For the 12-month period to March 13, our recommended domestic stock funds returned 11%, on average, and our overseas stock funds gained 17%. That compares with a 9% return for Standard & Poor's 500-stock index and a 16% gain for the MSCI EAFE index, which tracks overseas stock markets.

The performance of the bond market was uninspiring. Our five bond-fund picks gained a bit less than 4%, on average, but that was nearly two percentage points more than the gain of the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond index.

RELATED STORIES
The 25 best mutual funds
Portfolios to achieve your goals
What's in, what's out since last year
When a fund's size matters

Among domestic stock funds, eight delivered double-digit gains. Top performers were Bridgeway Aggressive Investors 2, up 23%, and Legg Mason Opportunity, 19%. Among the laggards were Clipper, which returned just 3%, and American Century Equity Income, up 5%. Of our bond-fund recommendations, Loomis Sayles Bond led the way, with a return just shy of 6%.

Two of our portfolios bested the S&P 500. Our long-term portfolio gained a little less than 13%. The medium-term portfolio returned a bit more than 12%. The short-term, income-oriented portfolio gained a bit less than 9%, essentially matching the S&P 500.

As always, we conducted a thorough house-cleaning this year of our recommended funds. We dropped five funds solely because they closed to new investors. We dumped others because they failed to measure up. For the details on changes to this list, see Kiplinger 25: What's In, What's Out.


SAVE, SHARE & DISCUSS:    |   |   |   |   |    
ADD HEADLINES:          
SPONSORED LINKS