Is a Robo-Adviser Right for You? The Pros and Cons
For many folks, robo advice can likely be fine. It's inexpensive and easy ... but also a little one-size-fits-all. More complex financial situations may need a human touch.
Robo-adviser platforms began to emerge in 2008 during the Great Financial Crisis. The initial hype created widespread speculation that they would replace traditional human financial professionals.
However, the idea has since faded, and many of the original entrants in this space have either been acquired or shut down. Today, most of the remaining robo-adviser platforms are run by the largest and most well-known U.S. asset managers, with only a few independent providers remaining.
As of November 2024, Vanguard runs the largest robo-adviser platform, with $333 billion in assets under management (AUM) and 805,000 users. Betterment and Wealthfront round out the top three robo-advisers.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
The Kiplinger Building Wealth program handpicks financial advisers and business owners from around the world to share retirement, estate planning and tax strategies to preserve and grow your wealth. These experts, who never pay for inclusion on the site, include professional wealth managers, fiduciary financial planners, CPAs and lawyers. Most of them have certifications including CFP®, ChFC®, IAR, AIF®, CDFA® and more, and their stellar records can be checked through the SEC or FINRA.
Many investors question whether a robo-adviser is right for them. This article explores the pros and cons to consider when comparing whether you should try a robo-adviser or work with a traditional financial planner.
The benefits of robo-advisers
Traditionally, robo-adviser platforms offer portfolio management and rebalancing for a low fee. Robo-advisers typically offer low account minimums and charge less in fees than financial advisers.
For example, Vanguard, known for its low-cost mutual funds, charges 0.15% (or 15 basis points) on assets under management (AUM) in its basic digital robo-adviser program. Betterment, another major platform, charges 0.25% for its service.
In these cases, investors are mostly paying for a model portfolio, a collection of five to eight exchange-traded funds (ETFs) curated based on a predefined investment strategy, and automated trading of that portfolio.
For investors who aren’t comfortable constructing a portfolio on their own but don’t need personalized financial planning, robo-advisers can be an attractive solution. Some robo-adviser platforms also advertise tax-loss harvesting, but this feature is often limited to larger account minimums.
Additionally, many robo-advisers offer mobile applications, making it easy for investors to manage their accounts, monitor account balances and track performance. The onboarding process is typically quick and walks the investor through a risk tolerance questionnaire to fit them with a recommended asset allocation.
Based on the investor responses, they may be assigned an aggressive growth strategy, a balanced portfolio or a conservative allocation. Once that allocation is approved, the funds are normally invested in low-cost ETFs or mutual funds and then rebalanced as needed.
One benefit of a robo-adviser for investors is access to institutionally designed portfolios that may be more diversified than what they would have built themselves. Therefore, managing risk is also a key benefit of the robo-adviser experience.
The downsides of robo-advisers
While robo-advisers are low-cost and easy to use, they come with limitations. Their simplicity often means they are unable to handle complex financial situations.
For example, an investor with multiple accounts who wants to take advantage of more advanced asset location strategies, such as placing equities in a Roth IRA and more tax-efficient assets in a taxable account, may find a robo-adviser platform inadequate.
Similarly, investors with more complex asset allocation needs won’t be well-suited for a robo-adviser.
For example, if an investor has some low-basis concentrated stock positions or legacy assets they don’t plan to liquidate and need to build a portfolio around, this will be difficult with a robo solution.
Additionally, an investor who owns stock options or a business will require more than an off-the-shelf asset allocation model.
High-net-worth investors looking for additional portfolio enhancements, such as alternative asset classes and private equity, won’t be able to access these in a typical robo-adviser portfolio. A robo-adviser trading model isn’t equipped to accommodate illiquid positions, which many newer investment alternative strategies involve.
The robo-adviser trading algorithm typically requires all positions to be tradable or it cannot propose and process trades automatically.
The major providers, like Vanguard, Schwab and Betterment, seem to be very aware of these platform limitations, as they all offer some form of enhanced service with their robo platforms to access human financial professionals — but for an additional fee.
Looking for expert tips to grow and preserve your wealth? Sign up for Building Wealth, our free, twice-weekly newsletter.
More and more, investors need financial planning advice in our rapidly changing world. While an algorithm can propose a portfolio based on risk tolerance, it lacks important contextual information.
Additionally, there could be important situations where a financial adviser, through direct interaction, can better assess a client’s comfort with the market than an online questionnaire.
In many situations, a financial adviser would recommend a specific allocation based on comprehensive financial planning with the client, which may be different than what the trading algorithm would recommend.
Conclusion
Paying a robo-adviser platform and then adding the cost of working with a financial professional may put your total cost closer to the cost of hiring a traditional financial adviser.
When robo-advisers originally launched, the industry expected investors to abandon human advisers and fundamentally change the financial industry. That has not come to pass.
More likely, robo-advisers appealed to a small subset of investors seeking low-cost portfolios without additional advice.
However, as those investors age and plan for future life transitions, there will likely come a point in time where robo-adviser clients actively seek out more comprehensive and full-service financial advice.
Related Content
- Late to Retirement Planning? Four Ways to Help Catch Up
- Should You Trust Robo-Advisers With Your Retirement?
- How to Find a Financial Adviser for Retirement Planning
- Want to Hire a Financial Planning Firm? Five Questions to Ask
- Kip ETF 20: The Best Cheap ETFs You Can Buy
-
4 Great Tools to DIY Your Own Financial PlanSmart Savings Several tools picked out by Kiplinger that DIYers can use to make their own financial plan.
-
The 7-Month Deadline That Sets Your Lifetime Medicare PremiumsUnderstanding Medicare enrollment is crucial, as missing deadlines can lead to permanent late enrollment penalties and gaps in coverage.
-
Retirees Living in Portugal: You Need a Post-NHR Tax StrategyWhen your 10-year Non-Habitual Resident tax break ends, you could see your tax rate soar. Take steps to plan for this change well before the NHR window closes.
-
The 7-Month Deadline That Determines Your Lifetime Medicare Premiums
Understanding Medicare enrollment is crucial, as missing deadlines can lead to permanent late enrollment penalties and gaps in coverage.
-
If You're a U.S. Retiree Living in Portugal, Your Tax Plan Needs a Post-NHR Strategy ASAP
When your 10-year Non-Habitual Resident tax break ends, you could see your tax rate soar. Take steps to plan for this change well before the NHR window closes.
-
Could Target-Date Funds With Built-In Income Guarantees Be the Next Evolution in Retirement Planning?With target-date funds falling short on income certainty, retirement plans should integrate guaranteed income solutions. Here is what participants can do.
-
Stocks Chop as the Unemployment Rate Jumps: Stock Market TodayNovember job growth was stronger than expected, but sharp losses in October and a rising unemployment rate are worrying market participants.
-
7 Ways to Plan Now to Save on Medicare IRMAA Surcharges LaterUnderstand the critical two-year lookback period and why aggressive planning before you enroll in Medicare is the most effective way to minimize IRMAA.
-
The Delayed November Jobs Report Is Out. Here's What It Means for the Fed and Rate CutsThe November jobs report came in higher than expected, although it still shows plenty of signs of weakness in the labor market.
-
The 'Best of Both Worlds' Rule of Retirement SpendingIt's the 4% rule on steroids. Here's what it is and why it may work for you.
-
Don't Let the Court Decide: Test Your Knowledge on Avoiding ProbateQuiz Test your basic understanding of why having a estate plan is crucial to avoiding probate in our quick quiz.
