IRS Quietly Changed the Rules on Your Children’s Inheritance
Property, such as your home, held in an irrevocable trust 'that is not included in the taxable estate at death' will no longer receive a step-up in basis. Here’s why the wording of that is key.


In March 2023, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2023-2, which had a substantial impact on estate planning, particularly where an irrevocable trust is involved. In the last decade or so, more families have begun utilizing irrevocable trusts to protect their assets from spend-down in order to qualify for government benefits, such as Medicaid and VA Aid and Attendance.
Prior to the issuance of this ruling, it was unclear whether assets passing to beneficiaries through an irrevocable trust would receive a step-up in basis, thereby eliminating any capital gains taxes that would otherwise be owed. Historically, assets that are disposed of during an individual’s lifetime are subject to capital gains taxes on the increase in value of that asset over time. The amount of capital gains owed is determined largely by the difference between the value at the time of purchase and the value at the time of transfer.
An exception to the obligation of capital gains taxes has been when assets pass at the death of the owner to their beneficiaries. The death of the owner bestows upon the recipients a step-up in basis, so they inherit the asset as if it had been purchased at the current fair market value, not the value at the time the asset was actually purchased. This eliminates any capital gains, and so no taxes become due.

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
What about an irrevocable trust?
But what to do about assets in an irrevocable trust? They are not currently held by the purchaser of the asset, nor have they passed to the beneficiaries. Prior to March 2023, such transfers from the trust at death have been generally receiving the step-up in basis. But that may not be the case any longer. This new ruling by the IRS states that property held in an irrevocable trust that is not included in the taxable estate at death will not receive a step-up in basis any longer.
At first glance, it sounds like anyone who does irrevocable trust planning will be subjecting their children to additional taxes. You may be wondering why anyone would do irrevocable trust planning in the first place. As Americans are aging and living longer, more are finding themselves in need of long-term care to the tune of, on average, $6,500 to $10,000 per month, depending on where you live and what level of care you need.
Very few families can afford to pay that out of pocket without depleting their life savings, which means turning to programs like Medicaid or VA Aid and Attendance to help with the cost. However, before you can qualify for such programs, you will be expected to go through a spend-down of your assets to a level set by the state in which you reside. One of the only tools that can protect assets from being subject to the spend-down process is an irrevocable trust.
Does asset protection planning now mean that to avoid the spend-down, you will have to subject your children to additional taxes? Maybe. The key part of the IRS’ decision is that only those assets that are held in an irrevocable trust that are not otherwise included in your estate at death for estate tax purposes will lose the step-up in basis. What does that mean? Essentially, in a move that is likely meant to make sure that as many estates as possible become subject to paying estate taxes, if you establish an irrevocable trust that is not set up properly, you will lose the step-up in basis.
How an irrevocable trust is set up is important
However, it is possible to establish an irrevocable trust that allows for any assets of the trust to still be included in the taxable estate at death — keeping in mind that most families, even with the inclusion of the value of their home, will not have estates large enough to be subject to estate taxes. Thus, your assets can be protected from spend-down due to long-term care, avoiding capital gains taxes and estate taxes and passing to your children tax-free. It just takes very careful planning.
By way of example, let’s look at a couple whom we will call Tom and Jane. Tom and Jane purchased a home (not a primary residence) in 1975 for $100,000. If that house is now worth $250,000 and they sell that house, they will owe capital gains taxes on the growth of $150,000. (An important note, if this property had been a primary residence, Tom and Jane would owe capital gains only on any growth exceeding $500,000.) In contrast, had Tom and Jane transferred their property to an irrevocable trust, prior to March of 2023, the trust could sell the house from a cost basis of $250,000, not $100,000 (because of the step-up in basis), so no capital gains would be due when the trust then distributes those proceeds to Tom and Jane’s children. Post-Revenue Ruling 2023-2, unless the trust is properly worded to ensure that the $250,000 value of the home is included in Tom and Jane’s taxable estate, the children will owe capital gains on $150,000.
Most families will not find themselves subject to estate tax when the value of their home is included because the current federal estate tax is only applicable to estates valued at $13.61 million or more. It will be more likely to impact families when the estate tax limit is lowered in 2026 to about half of that exemption amount. (For more about this, see the article What to Do Before the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Provisions Sunset.)
If you currently have an irrevocable trust or are interested in learning more about one, seek legal counsel from an attorney who is knowledgeable in both elder law and estate planning. It is also always a good idea to get your tax professional involved in the conversation so that nothing is missed in your plan.
The world is becoming more complex, as are the tax laws, but you (and your children) can still come out ahead with sound advice and planning.
Editor's note: This story has been updated to clarify the example of Tom and Jane.
Related Content
- 10 Things You Should Know About Estate Planning
- How to Use Your Estate Plan to Save Tax Now: A Timely Update
- Tax Season is Here: Big IRS Tax Changes to Know Before You File
- Why Do I Need a Trust?
- Eight Types of Trusts for Owners of High-Net-Worth Estates
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Lindsay Graves, founding partner of The Graves Law Firm, is passionate about assisting families through the challenges of the aging process to ensure dignity and financial preparedness with a comprehensive and compassionate approach. Her law firm focuses on helping clients to articulate their goals for asset preservation and long-term care and making them a reality, avoiding bankruptcy and securing wealth for loved ones. Lindsay and her team pride themselves on building and maintaining long-lasting relationships with their clients and families.
-
Could Screen Time Be Good for Your Health?
We all love our screen time. Could your tech habit be helping you age gracefully? The answer is astonishing.
-
These Cities Have the Most Dangerous Drivers — And It Could Cost You
A new list shows the cities where you're most likely to encounter collisions, making it a dangerous place to drive. That factor could also raise your insurance costs.
-
Investing Professionals Agree: Discipline Beats Drama Right Now
Big portfolio adjustments can do more harm than good. Financial experts suggest making thoughtful, strategic moves that fit your long-term goals.
-
'Doing Something' Because of Volatility Can Hurt You: Portfolio Manager Recommends Doing This Instead
Yes, it's hard, but if you tune out the siren song of high-flying sectors, resist acting on impulse and focus on your goals, you and your portfolio could be much better off.
-
Social Security's First Beneficiary Lived to Be 100: Will You?
Ida May Fuller, Social Security's first beneficiary, retired in 1939 and died in 1975. Today, we should all be planning for a retirement that's as long as Ida's.
-
An Investment Strategist Demystifies Direct Indexing: Is It for You?
You've heard of mutual funds and ETFs, but direct indexing may be a new concept ... one that could offer greater flexibility and possible tax savings.
-
Q2 2025 Post-Mortem: Rebound, Risks and Generational Shifts
As the third quarter gets underway, here are some takeaways from the market's second-quarter performance to consider as you make investment decisions.
-
Why Homeowners Should Beware of Tangled Titles
If you're planning to pass down property to your heirs, a 'tangled title' can complicate things. The good news is it can be avoided. Here's how.
-
A Cautionary Tale: Why Older Adults Should Think Twice About Being Landlords
Becoming a landlord late in life can be a risky venture because of potential health issues, cognitive challenges and susceptibility to financial exploitation.
-
Home Equity Evolution: A Fresh Approach to Funding Life's Biggest Needs
Homeowners leverage their home equity through various strategies, such as HELOCs or reverse mortgages. A newer option: Shared equity models. How do those work, and what are the pros and cons?