It’s no longer climate change — we live in a changed climate. The consequences are evident — the Los Angeles wildfires are just one example — but there is hope. Now is the time to mend the world we live in for ourselves and future generations. While you may be feeling helpless, there are steps you can take to make a positive impact today. This article will share the cost of inaction and how you can make a difference.
According to NASA, 2024 was the warmest year on record. The agency said: “For more than half of 2024, average temperatures were more than 1.5 degrees Celsius [about 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit] above the baseline, and the annual average, with mathematical uncertainties, may have exceeded the level for the first time.” The benchmark set by the Paris Agreement as a level that should not be exceeded is 1.5 degrees Celsius — a 2-degree Celsius increase (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) could result in catastrophic consequences.
Alarmingly, on January 20, President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris Agreement. This is troubling for many reasons, one of which is that the United States is one of the world’s top producers of carbon emissions. While individual states and businesses retain the ability to pursue climate change independently, the absence of federal leadership creates a substantial setback for the progress that has been made.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Hard to ignore the impact
Trump's decision comes at a time when the devastating impact of climate change has become increasingly impossible to ignore. The unprecedented amount of destruction wrought by the California wildfires and Hurricane Helene has left those impacted reeling. Pacific Palisades has been all but burned off the map, and Asheville, N.C., will take years to clean up and rebuild. But it’s not like these consequences weren’t predicted. According to the Royal Institution, as early as 1824, Joseph Fourier theorized the greenhouse effect. Almost 150 years later, meteorologist John Sawyer published a paper in Nature predicting the rate of global warming from an excess of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was established in 1988 — the same year that James Hansen testified before Congress. In that hearing, Hansen said that he was “99% certain” that pollution was already warming the earth, causing droughts and heat waves. Lawmakers had to “‘stop waffling’ and deal with the problem, he vented to reporters as he left the Senate chamber,” according to a Columbia Magazine article.
Since then, there have been 29 COP global climate conferences, the Kyoto Protocol, the Paris Agreement and numerous other attempts to rein in emissions. Yet over that time, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has continued to grow at a 22% pace, from 349 parts per million to 426 parts per million and rising. With the United States’ decision to leave the Paris Agreement, we can expect this number to grow at exponential rates.
As early as 1977, Exxon scientists knew what was happening with emissions and the potentially catastrophic results but unapologetically continued producing fossil-fuel-based energy. A 2023 report in Science examined the accuracy of Exxon’s scientific projections and determined that they were quite accurate. “What we found is that between 1977 and 2003, excellent scientists within Exxon modeled and predicted global warming with, frankly, shocking skill and accuracy only for the company to then spend the next couple of decades denying that very climate science,” said Geoffrey Supran, lead author.
And here we are, dealing with the impacts of a changed climate so oil companies and other emissions-intensive industries could make billions of dollars in profits. It’s time to stop making excuses for corporate greed and place the blame for these unnatural disasters at the feet of those who enabled them to happen. It’s time to shun polluting industries for their refusal to accept their responsibility and make meaningful changes.
Investing (and divesting) for change
Here are four things you can do today to make a change:
1. Divest from fossil fuels and other harmful industries.
Investing is like voting with your wallet. If enough of us divest from fossil fuels, that could be the wake-up call these companies need. It will also free up your money to invest in forward-looking companies that are doing good for the planet.
2. Align your investment with your values.
Investing in sustainable companies that are innovators, the ones that are developing solutions to our greatest challenges and leading us into a cleaner, more resource efficient and more equitable economy. Don’t be fooled by funds with ESG in the name; it’s critical to look under the hood of your investments to make sure they aren’t greenwashed.
3. Understand the importance of resilience and innovation in a changed-climate world.
My new definition of sustainable, resilient and innovative (SRI) investing integrates the three most important elements of the new economy. We cannot look only to reduce our impact via sustainability, but, in light of the hurricane devastation in Asheville and the fires in Los Angeles, we must invest in resilience and adaptation because of the changed climate. Innovation is the glue that holds these together and provides opportunity.
4. Hold the bad actors accountable.
Although Trump took the U.S. out of the Paris Agreement, there are policymakers and legislation that are prioritizing climate action, and you can support them and their initiatives to hold polluting industries accountable.
It’s time for our investment portfolios to evolve to reflect a new economy — one that nurtures solutions to reduce the impacts of the changing climate and be resilient and adaptive to the changed climate events impacting us. One that places the health and well-being of all living things on equal footing with profit. If it’s not blatantly obvious that action needs to be taken now, I’m not sure what additional evidence is needed. The Cree proverb is appropriate: "When the last tree has been cut down, the last fish caught, the last river poisoned, only then will we realize that one cannot eat money.”
Related Content
- Do Green Credit Cards Deliver?
- 9 Best Green Energy Stocks to Buy Now
- Four Sustainable Investments That Could Have a Positive Impact
- Committed to Sustainable Investing? Three Questions to Ask Your Adviser
- The Majority of ESG Funds Are Not Sustainable. Here’s Why.
-
I'm want to give my 3 grandkids $5K each for Christmas.You're comfortably retired and want to give your grandkids a big Christmas check, but their parents are worried they might spend it all. We ask the pros for help.
-
If You're Not Doing Roth Conversions, You Need to Read ThisRoth conversions and other Roth strategies can be complex, but don't dismiss these tax planning tools outright. They could really work for you and your heirs.
-
Could Traditional Retirement Expectations Be Killing Us?A retirement psychologist makes the case: A fulfilling retirement begins with a blueprint for living, rather than simply the accumulation of a large nest egg.
-
I'm Retired and Want to Give My 3 Grandkids $5,000 Each for Christmas, But Their Parents Don't Want Them to Spend It All.
You're comfortably retired and want to give your grandkids a big Christmas check, but their parents are worried they might spend it all. We ask the pros for help.
-
I'm a Financial Planner: If You're Not Doing Roth Conversions, You Need to Read This
Roth conversions and other Roth strategies can be complex, but don't dismiss these tax planning tools outright. They could really work for you and your heirs.
-
Could Traditional Retirement Expectations Be Killing Us? A Retirement Psychologist Makes the Case
A retirement psychologist makes the case: A fulfilling retirement begins with a blueprint for living, rather than simply the accumulation of a large nest egg.
-
I'm a Financial Adviser: This Is How You Can Adapt to Social Security UncertaintyRather than letting the unknowns make you anxious, focus on building a flexible income strategy that can adapt to possible future Social Security changes.
-
The Stoic Retirement: Ancient Wisdom for Today’s Biggest Life TransitionA "Stoic retirement" doesn't mean depriving yourself. It's a character-based approach to life and aging that can bring calm and clarity.
-
11 Outrageous Ways To Spend Money in RetirementWhether you have excess cash to spend or want to pretend, here’s a look at 11 ridiculous ways retirees can splurge.
-
I'm a Financial Planner for Millionaires: Here's How to Give Your Kids Cash Gifts Without Triggering IRS PaperworkMost people can gift large sums without paying tax or filing a return, especially by structuring gifts across two tax years or splitting gifts with a spouse.
-
'Boomer Candy' Investments Might Seem Sweet, But They Can Have a Sour AftertasteProducts such as index annuities, structured notes and buffered ETFs might seem appealing, but sometimes they can rob you of flexibility and trap your capital.
