The Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCE), the Federal Reserve's preferred inflation metric over the past 25 years, came in lower than expected recently, encouraging news for Wall Street.
According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, April's PCE inflation figure was up 2.1% year over year, lower than the median 2.2% increase expected by economists and within a chip-shot of the Fed's 2% target.
More recent data on inflation also painted an upbeat picture. Specifically, the May Consumer Price Index (CPI) arrived below estimates, suggesting a muted impact from President Donald Trump's tariff policies.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Having these multiple reports on inflation may have some folks wondering what the difference is between PCE and the more commonly quoted CPI.
More importantly, there may be some market participants unsure as to why the Fed prefers the PCE over other inflation metrics, such as CPI, as it has done since 2000 when former Federal Reserve Chair Alan Greenspan made the PCE the Fed's preferred inflation gauge.
To understand why, let's dig into the details.
Why does the Fed use PCE instead of CPI?
CPI and PCE inflation tend to be pretty similar. However, there are a few noteworthy differences in what is included in the indexes, how things are weighted and how each index adjusts for real-world changes.
The Consumer Price Index measures out-of-pocket expenses for urban consumers on a fixed basket of goods and services. These include basics such as food, rent and gas.
The Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index casts the net a little wider to include spending on behalf of American households by others. This means things such as employer-paid health insurance or Medicare and Medicaid benefits. As such, you could argue that the PCE gives a generally more complete picture of inflation.
This is one reason the Federal Reserve prefers the PCE over the CPI. It includes a wider assortment of items covering a larger percentage of the U.S. population.
While the CPI and PCE generally trend in the same direction, there can be some significant differences due to the weightings of items.
For example, housing accounts for a massive 33% of the CPI but only 15% of the PCE. Part of this is because the CPI focuses on urban consumers, whereas the PCE includes rural populations , whose housing tends to be cheaper.
This doesn't mean one is "right" or the other is "wrong." But to understand and interpret either, you need to know what's included in the numbers. The Fed has taken the view that the PCE's weightings are more reflective of the day-to-day reality of the typical American.
Most important perhaps is that there is a major difference in the way the two inflation metrics are calculated. The CPI uses a fixed basket of goods and services, which assumes that people buy the same things every month. It makes no allowance for behavior changes due to rising prices.
The PCE, meanwhile, uses a chained index. This accounts for how Americans substitute goods when prices change. For example, if chicken gets unusually expensive due to a bird flu outbreak, beef or pork might be comparatively cheaper.
This might encourage folks to shy away from chicken and opt for a lower-priced alternative instead.
Because the PCE reflects (or attempts to reflect) real-world spending changes, it tends to report lower and smoother inflation.
Does this mean the Fed is "cheating" by cherry-picking an inflation metric that is often lower?
Not at all.
The Fed wants to avoid getting distracted by the noise and focus on real trends.
Returning to the chicken example, the soaring price of chicken and eggs in the United States isn't due to inflation, per se. It's due to a nasty avian pandemic that is reducing the chicken population. It's a supply shock, not a demand-based surge brought on by excessively loose monetary policy.
But if food prices are rising in general, that's a different story. That would be a sign of real, systemic inflation. The PCE inflation gauge does a better job of communicating this real, systemic inflation to the Fed's policymakers.
The bottom line on PCE
Is the Fed "right" to use PCE inflation?
That's open to debate. But of the major inflation indexes tracked today, the PCE's broad product and geographic focus and its attempts to model real-world spending changes make it a worthy choice for the Fed.
Related content
-
Think Twice Before Getting a Credit Card Cash AdvanceA credit card cash advance can be a quick solution when you need emergency help with money. But you'll pay for the convenience with high interest and fees.
-
What is AI Worth to the Economy?The Letter Spending on AI is already boosting GDP, but will the massive outlays being poured into the technology deliver faster economic growth in the long run?
-
9 Warren Buffett Quotes for Investors to Live ByWarren Buffett transformed Berkshire Hathaway from a struggling textile firm to a sprawling conglomerate and investment vehicle. Here's how he did it.
-
I'm a Financial Adviser: Three Things You Will Wish You Did Before the Fed Cuts Interest RatesWith potential interest rate cuts on the horizon, you might want to lock in today's higher yields and consider adjusting your asset allocation.
-
Simple Ways to Save on Back-to-School Shopping This YearSet a budget and stick to it, scour the house for what you already have, decorate backpacks and lunch boxes with your kids and consider buying some items during holiday sales.
-
Stocks End Strong Month on a Down Note: Stock Market TodayThere was likely a bit of profit-taking ahead of a historically weak September.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into UnitedHealth Group Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayUNH stock was a massive market beater for ages – until it wasn't.
-
The Seven-Day Financial Reset: A Simple Plan to Get Control of Your Money, From an ExpertSometimes, getting unstuck requires a reset. These practical steps can help you tackle your money issues and feel less overwhelmed by it all.
-
Three Pros (and Four Cons) of Hiring Multiple Financial Advisers: The View From a Financial AdviserThere's nothing to stop you from working with several financial advisers instead of just one. But take a balanced view of the risks and rewards first.
-
S&P 500 Tops 6,500 Even as Nvidia Slips: Stock Market TodayThe world's most valuable company closed lower after earnings, but the S&P 500 managed to notch a new record high.
