What Midterm Elections Mean for You and Your Money
Regardless of midterm election results, an end to at least a little uncertainty is likely to be a plus for your portfolio.
As Americans head to the polls, it's probably safe to say that the outcome of the 2026 midterm elections will be among the most closely watched in memory. But, politics aside, what should investors be on the lookout for?
If history is a guide, you can expect a power shift in Congress. But history also shows that whether your party is victorious or not, your portfolio is likely to survive the midterms unscathed—and maybe a little ahead.
For investors, as William Blair economist Richard de Chazal writes, "The midterms should not displace the larger forces driving markets. The fundamentals that have shaped returns this year will not change on November 3."
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Incumbent parties tend to lose ground in midterm elections. Since 1950, the party in the White House has lost 25 seats, on average, in the House of Representatives and three seats in the Senate, according to UBS Chief Economist Arend Kapteyn.
The Democrats need to flip just three Republican seats to gain control of the House, and the Cook Political Report suggests they're likely to gain a narrow majority there.
The Senate is also in play, with 20 GOP seats up for grabs, compared with 13 for Democrats. Including 34 Democratic and 31 Republican seats not contested this year, Cook says 46 seats lean Democratic and 47 lean Republican. Seven races are toss-ups, so forecasts aren't as clear.
Betting markets, meanwhile, are pricing in a Democratic sweep. As of October 1, Polymarket showed Democrats with a 63% chance of winning both the House and the Senate, and a 31% chance of a split Congress with a Republican Senate. Polymarket prices a Republican sweep at 8% and a Democratic Senate with a Republican House at 1%.
Chazal is more circumspect. "November looks set to produce divided government. With Democrats favored to retake the House and control of the Senate still uncertain," the economist writes, "Washington may struggle to pass major legislation after the election."
A divided-Congress scenario "would make another reconciliation bill more difficult, though not impossible," Chazal writes. "It would also shift the House's focus toward oversight and investigations, and raise the prospect of a debt-limit confrontation before the next deadline."
Current federal government funding expires on December 11, and we're on track to reach the debt ceiling in the first half of 2027.
Divided government "would make large fiscal initiatives harder to pass," an outcome that could ease pressure in the bond market "even if a debt-limit standoff would bring its own volatility."
Chazal says an unlikely "Republican sweep would create the opposite risk: renewed fiscal expansion," which includes President Donald Trump's proposal to send American citizens $5,000 checks and "could add to inflation and upward pressure on bond yields."
As Kapteyn acknowledges, this is a historically vulnerable window, with market volatility typically rising into the election before falling sharply afterward.
Meanwhile, as the UBS economist says, the major risk isn't which party wins. It's whether a Democratic sweep increases regulation and costs for the AI boom.
"This year's setup is more fragile because election uncertainty is colliding with a newly hawkish Federal Reserve, a 10-year Treasury yield near 5 percent and oil prices that continue to feed the inflation debate," Kapteyn observes.
The economist also points out that any stock market weakness around midterm elections has historically been followed by strong returns, though he cites 1978, 2002 and 2018 as instances where "inflation, technology excess and Fed tightening can overwhelm the usual post-election relief trade."
Whatever you do, don't let a fixation on politics distract you from matters more important to the market, such as the pace of earnings and GDP growth.
When it comes to you and your money, almost every professional strategist or analyst will say almost every time that you'll fare better if you focus on fundamentals rather than midterm elections.
Related content
