If it's a dirty job, Waste Management (symbol WMI) wants to do it. Whether it's taking out the trash at the end of your driveway or disposing of a barrel of toxic waste from the local chemical plant, the Houston-based company is up to the task. Fortunately, as the economy grows, so does its garbage. "The solid waste industry is in the early stage of an improving industry cycle, highlighted by some of the best fundamental business conditions seen in the past five years," says Michael Hoffman, an analyst with investment bank Friedman Billings Ramsey.
The bad news for you is that your garbage bills are probably going up, and there's little your neighborhood association can do about it. Trash collectors, led by Waste Management, have been raising prices for their services since last year. "Garbage companies have only seen minimal resistance to price increases," says Merrill Lynch analyst Lorraine Maikis. And there's no sign of relief for the disgruntled bill-payers. Hoffman expects price hikes to continue until 2008.
But higher trash-collection fees can only last for so long. Unlike some garbage companies, Waste Management has diversified into the energy business. It operates 17 waste-to-energy plants in California, Florida and Washington, and in Northeast states through the company's Wheelabrator subsidiary. The facilities burn solid waste at high temperatures in boilers that produce steam to generate electricity. They can incinerate up to 24,000 tons of solid waste a day. Energy revenue grew 5%, to $879 million, in 2005, which was a higher revenue growth rate than the 4.2% for the rest of the company last year.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Trash isn't the only thing burning brightly at Waste Management. The company reported earnings of $1.2 billion last year, or $2.09 per share, up from $939 million, or $1.60 per share, in 2004. Shares recently traded at $35, or 21 times the $1.67 per share analysts expect the company to earn for this year. Maikis says the stock's valuation is "unwarranted given its industry-leading position, attractive landfill assets and cash generation." She and Hoffman both think the stock is worth $40 a share.
--Thomas M. Anderson
-
Donating Complex Assets Doesn't Have to Be ComplicatedIf you're looking to donate less-conventional assets but don't know where to start, this charity executive has answers, such as considering a donor-advised fund (DAF) for its tax benefits and ease of use.
-
Travel trends you can expect this summerThe Kiplinger Letter Domestic trips will trump foreign travel amid economic uncertainties, though some costs are down.
-
My Three-Day Rule for Investing: And If it Applies NowStock Market I've seen a lot in my career. Here's what I see now in the stock market.
-
Is It Time to Invest in Europe?Stock Market Europe is being shaken out of its lethargy, militarily and otherwise, by Donald Trump's changes in U.S. policy. Should investors start buying?
-
Fed Leaves Rates Unchanged: What the Experts Are SayingFederal Reserve As widely expected, the Federal Open Market Committee took a 'wait-and-see' approach toward borrowing costs.
-
Fed Sees Fewer Rate Cuts in 2025: What the Experts Are Saying
Federal Reserve The Federal Reserve cut interest rates as expected, but the future path of borrowing costs became more opaque.
-
Why Is Warren Buffett Selling So Much Stock?Berkshire Hathaway is dumping equities, hoarding cash and making market participants nervous.
-
Fed Cuts Rates Again: What the Experts Are Saying
Federal Reserve The central bank continued to ease, but a new administration in Washington clouds the outlook for future policy moves.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Google Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayGoogle parent Alphabet has been a market-beating machine for ages.
-
Fed Goes Big With First Rate Cut: What the Experts Are Saying
Federal Reserve A slowing labor market prompted the Fed to start with a jumbo-sized reduction to borrowing costs.
