Carnivors hungry for a high-quality steak appreciate the tender cuts served at Ruth's Chris Steak House. Now some analysts say that the retaurant chain's stock, which went public last August, is looking tasty, too.
Founded as a single restaurant in New Orleans in 1965, Ruth's Chris has grown into the largest high-end steak house chain in the U.S., with about 90 locations worldwide. (The company owns slightly less than half of the restaurants; the rest are franchised.) Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma dealt a tough blow to Ruth's last fall, damaging some of its restaurants and prompting management to move headquarters to Orlando.
But the corporate transition is now finished, and the company is ready for growth, according to analyst Peter Oakes of Piper Jaffray. Oakes says the company generated solid sales in the fourth quarter. Sales grew 8.5% at company-owned locations open at least one year, and 8% at franchised locations. The company said Tuesday that it expects same-store sales to grow between 4.5% and 5.5% in 2006, higher than its previous forecast of 3% to 4%. That Ruth's caters to an affluent crowd bodes well, in Oakes's view, because high-end customers aren't as sensitive to the ups and downs of the economy as diners at mainstream casual restaurants are.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Cowen Co. analyst Paul Westra also likes the stock (symbol RUTH). He sees plenty of room for Ruth's Chris to expand to additional markets and says that its proven brand, strong management team and appeal to a wide range of customers should keep it "the undisputed leader" in the fast-growing fine-dining business. He thinks the company could eventually open more than 300 new locations.
The stock has been volatile. After debuting at $20, the shares fell to $16 in mid November. They've since recovered to $22, as of Wednesday, or 26 times the 86 cents per share that analysts expect the company to earn in 2006. Westra figures that the stock is worth $28.
--Lisa Dixon
-
Small Businesses Are Racing to Use AIThe Kiplinger Letter Spurred on by competitive pressures, small businesses are racing to adopt AI. A recent snapshot shows the technology’s day-to-day uses.
-
The Me-First Rule of Retirement SpendingFollow the 'Me-First" rule and you won't have to worry about running out of money when the stock market goes south.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Sherwin-Williams Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodaySherwin-Williams stock has clobbered the broader market by a wide margin for a long time.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into UnitedHealth Group Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayUNH stock was a massive market beater for ages — until it wasn't.
-
What Tariffs Mean for Your Sector ExposureNew, higher and changing tariffs will ripple through the economy and into share prices for many quarters to come.
-
How to Invest for a Fall Interest Rate Cut by the FedA lot can happen between now and then, but the probability the Fed cuts interest rates in September is back above 80%.
-
Are Buffett and Berkshire About to Bail on Kraft Heinz Stock?Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway own a lot of Kraft Heinz stock, so what happens when they decide to sell KHC?
-
How the Stock Market Performed in the First 6 Months of Trump's Second TermSix months after President Donald Trump's inauguration, take a look at how the stock market has performed.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Berkshire Hathaway Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayBerkshire Hathaway is a long-time market beater, but the easy money in BRK.B has already been made.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Procter & Gamble Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayProcter & Gamble stock is a dependable dividend grower, but a disappointing long-term holding.
