Dr. Edward Yardeni is president and chief investment strategist for Yardeni Research Inc.
KIPLINGER'S: Explain the uptick rule, please.
YARDENI: It was a rule created by the Securities and Exchange Commission that required traders to wait to short a stock until its price went up. [Short sales involve selling borrowed shares to bet that the price will drop, then replacing those shares at a lower price.] The rule was established in the 1930s and was designed to stop traders from ganging up on individual stocks and driving prices down in a free-fall market. The rule was repealed in 2007 after studies showed that markets would not be hurt by its absence.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
What impact has the repeal had on the market? I think its repeal has contributed to the major volatility in the markets. There's some controversy about the rule, but if we brought it back I think it would help restore liquidity and lower volatility. For one thing, bringing back the uptick rule is one of the best ways to reduce high-frequency trading [in which computer-driven trades are executed in nanoseconds], which I think is contributing to volatility and impeding a sustainable rise in stock values. Most of all, bringing back the uptick rule would help restore individual investors' confidence in the market, which has been lost in the wake of the volatility.
How much of the volatility is due to high-frequency trading versus uncertainty surrounding the European debt crisis and the U.S. economy? That's a good point. Curtailing or banning high-frequency trading doesn't mean we'll never have bear markets again. It means that markets will likely be less volatile and will be based on fundamentals rather than on computer algorithms whipping people in and out of shares.
What are the odds that the SEC will reinstate the uptick rule? Not good. The SEC study suggested that the uptick rule was never effective in the first place. However, as with every academic study, a lot of assumptions went into its preparation. And some of them, I think, are questionable.
Are there other fixes besides the uptick rule? There has to be a complete reassessment of the deregulation that has occurred. Deregulation should increase liquidity, transparency and fairness of markets, and there should be a tremendous amount of scrutiny to ensure that no one games the system.
-
What Tariffs Mean for Your Sector ExposureNew, higher and changing tariffs will ripple through the economy and into share prices for many quarters to come.
-
How to Invest for a Fall Interest Rate Cut by the FedA lot can happen between now and then, but the probability the Fed cuts interest rates in September is back above 80%.
-
Are Buffett and Berkshire About to Bail on Kraft Heinz Stock?Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway own a lot of Kraft Heinz stock, so what happens when they decide to sell KHC?
-
How the Stock Market Performed in the First 6 Months of Trump's Second TermSix months after President Donald Trump's inauguration, take a look at how the stock market has performed.
-
Fed Leaves Rates Unchanged: What the Experts Are SayingFederal Reserve As widely expected, the Federal Open Market Committee took a 'wait-and-see' approach toward borrowing costs.
-
Fed Sees Fewer Rate Cuts in 2025: What the Experts Are Saying
Federal Reserve The Federal Reserve cut interest rates as expected, but the future path of borrowing costs became more opaque.
-
Fed Cuts Rates Again: What the Experts Are Saying
Federal Reserve The central bank continued to ease, but a new administration in Washington clouds the outlook for future policy moves.
-
Fed Goes Big With First Rate Cut: What the Experts Are Saying
Federal Reserve A slowing labor market prompted the Fed to start with a jumbo-sized reduction to borrowing costs.
