I Don't Need Social Security. Should I Skip Benefits and Save Them for People Who Do?
What happens when you forgo Social Security benefits?


As of May 2025, more than 54 million Americans aged 65 and older were receiving Social Security. And for retirees without much savings, those monthly benefits can be a true financial lifeline.
But what if you’re a retiree with plenty of savings — more than enough money to support the lifestyle you want without Social Security?
At that point, you have choices. You could delay your Social Security claim beyond full retirement age for boosted monthly checks — an option you might as well take advantage of in the absence of needing the money sooner. Or, you may be thinking of saying no to Social Security completely.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
At a time when Social Security’s finances are on shaky footing and benefit cuts are a possibility in the future, you might think forgoing benefits is a helpful thing to do. That way, you can save the money for retirees who truly need it to get by. But while that’s a generous idea in theory, it may not be so effective in practice.
Skipping Social Security
Being eligible for Social Security does not compel you to take benefits. In fact, age 70 is generally considered the latest age at which it makes sense to file for benefits, as it’s when the program’s delayed retirement credits stop accruing.
But people who don’t claim Social Security by 70 aren’t signed up automatically. And if you opt not to take your benefits because you don’t need the money, no one is going to force you to file.
That doesn’t mean you’ll be helping others, though.
"There's a more reliable way to do good," says Ken Robinson, JD, CFP®, and principal and wealth adviser at Sax Wealth Advisors. "Skipping your own Social Security benefit so there's more for others is a generous idea, but whether or not it works is at the whim of Congress, who can change Social Security and take away any benefit you would have provided."
A more effective approach, Robinson insists, is to use your Social Security benefits to provide an ongoing gift to charity.
"You can target whatever need is most important to you,” he says. “Instead of your benefit making an immeasurably small difference to Social Security, every dollar you give to, say, your local food bank can create three meals for people facing food insecurity."
Taking a stand
You may feel that claiming Social Security is unethical when that money won’t make a material difference in your life. But Andrew Constantinides, CFP and investment adviser and RSU (restricted stock units) strategist at Neil Jesani Wealth Management, LLC, says that line of thinking is a bit skewed.
"When a high-net-worth retiree asks whether they should forgo Social Security benefits out of principle or to leave more for those who need it, it’s worth stepping back and considering what Social Security actually is and what it isn’t,” he explains.
“Social Security is not a needs-based welfare program. It is a legislated entitlement based on lifetime contributions. To decline benefits as a symbolic gesture misunderstands the system's structure.”
Constantinides also insists that forgoing Social Security benefits doesn’t redistribute wealth. Rather, he says, “It just reduces your own lifetime return on a mandatory contribution.”
Furthermore, Constantinides thinks retirees looking to skip Social Security should consider the positive impact it might have on their finances, even when money isn’t a concern.
“From a portfolio construction perspective, I view Social Security as a baseline, inflation-protected income stream that carries zero correlation to market assets,” he says. “That makes it valuable, even to those who don't strictly need the cash flow.”
Constantinides says that some of his wealthy clients choose to delay their Social Security claims for various reasons, such as to optimize spousal benefits. And he doesn’t see a problem with that. Rather, he thinks choosing not to file for Social Security at all out of moral discomfort is a decision to approach carefully.
“It’s one thing to redirect the income toward philanthropy or family legacy planning,” he says. “It’s another to let it vanish into the system unused.”
So, should you skip Social Security benefits?
It’s a nice thing to be concerned about the welfare of others, and to be thinking of giving up Social Security to save that money for people who need it more than you do. But forgoing your benefits won’t save the program from broad cuts, nor will it make the same type of impact as donating to a charity that’s meaningful to you.
As Constantinides says, "Declining Social Security to save the system is like refusing dessert at a buffet because you’re worried they’ll run out. The buffet isn’t built that way, and neither is the program."
Read More
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Maurie Backman is a freelance contributor to Kiplinger. She has over a decade of experience writing about financial topics, including retirement, investing, Social Security, and real estate. She has written for USA Today, U.S. News & World Report, and Bankrate. She studied creative writing and finance at Binghamton University and merged the two disciplines to help empower consumers to make smart financial planning decisions.
-
Credit Cards That Actually Reward Your Loyalty
If you have bank or investment accounts with your credit card issuer, you may qualify for extra cash back, waived fees and other benefits.
-
The 10 Most Valuable Vacation Destinations for Retirees in 2026
Whether traveling within the U.S. or internationally, retirees can find a perfect blend of relaxation and excitement in these destinations, all while staying within budget.
-
The 10 Most Valuable Vacation Destinations for Retirees in 2026
Whether traveling within the U.S. or internationally, retirees can find a perfect blend of relaxation and excitement in these destinations, all while staying within budget.
-
Will Taxes Shred Your 401(k) or IRA During Your Retirement? It's Very Likely
Conventional wisdom dictates that you save in a 401(k) now and pay taxes later, but turning that rule on its head could leave you far better off. A financial planner explains why.
-
More Retirees Are Renting: Should You? A Financial Adviser Weighs In
In some ways, renting is cheaper, more flexible and easier, but unless you understand the implications for your taxes and health costs, it might not be for you.
-
The Ultimate Cruise Packing List for Retirees
Ready to set sail on your dream cruise? Here’s a no-fuss packing list tailored for older travelers to keep your trip stress-free.
-
Where There's a Will, There's a Way Your Assets Will Be Distributed as You Wish
Your will is the backbone of a strong, adaptable estate plan that ensures what you leave behind goes to your selected beneficiaries. Without a will, state laws determine who gets your assets.
-
I'm a Financial Adviser: This Is What You're Really Losing if You Cut Back on Your 401(k) Contributions
Missing out on the benefits of the employer match and compounding growth could force you to work longer and lower your standard of living in retirement. Here are some alternative options.
-
The 'Permission to Spend' Rules of Retirement Spending
Here’s how to spend guilt-free when you are in retirement.
-
Major Insurers Scale Back Medicare Advantage and Part D Plans for 2026
Beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage and Part D prescription drug plans might be losing their plan as UnitedHealthcare, Humana, and Aetna (CVS Health) scale back offerings for 2026.