We’ve all seen news stories where giant swarms of locusts descend on farmers’ fields and within minutes decimate their crops. Did you know there is a human version?
That’s right, human “locusts” devouring plate after plate, tray after tray of expensive food items at all-you-can-eat (AYCE) buffets, in quantities most people would consider unreasonable.
The justification? “Well, it’s all you can eat, so I’m getting my money’s worth!”
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
YouTube has dozens of videos showing customers — who have annihilated trays of lobster, prime rib, sushi and other expensive proteins — with sad faces, seemingly shocked that a restaurant would cut them off. They’re asking, “Can they kick me out of an all-you-can-eat buffet for eating too much?”
'We are competitive eaters'
On December 31, 2024, I received a request to accept a WhatsApp video call from “a reader with an urgent legal question.” Curious, I agreed and at once was greeted by folks at an AYCE buffet.
“Janine” explained that she and her five friends were warming up for a competitive-eating contest at a restaurant. “We each pay for the buffet and then practice eating as much as we can.”
When I asked if they’d explained their purpose for being there before paying, she replied in an arrogant, entitled, emphatic tone of voice, “No! Why should we?”
Their camera operator sent me real-time video of what I can describe only as human vacuum cleaners devouring plate after plate of expensive meat and seafood items — enormous amounts of lobster, crab and prime rib.
They were all laughing. I wasn’t.
After attending Loyola University School of Law, H. Dennis Beaver joined California's Kern County District Attorney's Office, where he established a Consumer Fraud section. He is in the general practice of law and writes a syndicated newspaper column. "I love law for the reason that I can help people resolve their problems," he says. "I know it sounds corny, but I just love to be able to use my education and experience to help — simply to help. When a reader contacts me, it is a gift."
It reminded me of Ring camera videos on YouTube at Halloween of adults wearing masks and ill-fitting costumes while emptying entire bowls of candy — intended for kids — into bags and running away. Pure theft.
To me, these competitive eaters were ripping off the restaurant. The owner, on camera, said, “Stop! This isn’t the Las Vegas Bellagio buffet. What you are doing would be wrong there, too, but this is our family’s livelihood. You are taking so much that my other customers have nothing. Get out, and do not ever return.”
“I read your Kiplinger column. You help people. This is an AYCE restaurant! Can he do this?” Janine asked with sad, puppy-dog eyes.
Her attempt at innocence and victimization didn’t fool me.
“Janine, in my legal opinion, yes, but lawyers have differing opinions. To be safe, I recommend leaving the restaurant immediately.”
Competitive eating vs food insecurity
Competitive eating — consuming as much as you can as fast as you can within a given period of time — is big business and has been around for hundreds of years. While beyond the space limits of this article, it is important to be aware that there have been several deaths during these events, as well as long-term health consequences.
Also, there is a moral issue involved here.
In 2023, 13.5% of U.S. households were food insecure, having difficulty providing enough food for their members due to a lack of resources. Blogger Jane Olivier eloquently puts it this way: “Competitive eating mocks struggles of the poor who worry about how to put any food on the table to feed themselves and their children. How disrespectful it is for those suffering from malnutrition in famine or drought-stricken regions to see such blatant, unnecessary gorging for the sake of ‘sport.’ These contestants make a game out of stuffing themselves to sickening levels while almost one billion don’t even have access to enough calories.”
“I could not find this issue adjudicated,” says Bryan Hull, Los Angeles-based Loyola Law School Contracts Law professor. He suggests, “Management should have a time limit or language that would spell out the terms so that customers know what they are getting into. A restaurant could refuse to serve someone who has abused the system. If they sued, the damages — if any — would likely be the cost of the buffet.”
Good faith, fair dealing and reasonableness
I discussed this issue with Catherine Pastrikos Kelly, a New York attorney. She has written extensively on the legal issues raised in implied contracts. “Going to a restaurant and paying for food is an implied contract,” she says, “and like all contracts, there is a duty of good faith and fair dealing. This means acting in a reasonable manner. At a buffet — even an all-you-can-eat buffet — a customer would be expected to eat what a person would reasonably eat at one meal.
“For example, it would not mean eating 30 to 40 lobsters or multiple trays of food or practice for an eating competition, for that is not what a reasonable person would do. In situations where the customer is acting outside the scope of what a reasonable person would do, management would be well within their rights to make them stop, pay extra or, potentially, leave the premises.”
So a sign that says “all you can eat” doesn’t mean we get to abandon all logic and human decency. Let’s enjoy ourselves within reason.
Dennis Beaver practices law in Bakersfield, Calif., and welcomes comments and questions from readers, which may be faxed to (661) 323-7993, or e-mailed to Lagombeaver1@gmail.com. And be sure to visit dennisbeaver.com.
Related Content
- Feel Free to Disagree, But Here's How to Bridge Differences
- Six Things Not to Do if You Want to Resolve a Conflict
- Seven Ways to Be an Absolute Jerk as a Lawyer
- Is Money Messing Up Your Family's Life?
- ADA Violation or Just Bad Business? Honey, I Shrunk the Menu!
-
Original Medicare vs Medicare Advantage Quiz: Which is Right for You?Quiz Take this quick quiz to discover your "Medicare Personality Type" and learn whether you are a Traditionalist, or a Bundler.
-
Ask the Editor: Capital Gains and Tax PlanningAsk the Editor In this week's Ask the Editor Q&A, Joy Taylor answers questions on capital gains tax rates and end-of-year tax planning
-
Time Is Running Out to Make the Best Tax Moves for 2025Don't wait until January — investors, including those with a high net worth, can snag big tax savings for 2025 (and 2026) with these strategies.
-
Time Is Running Out to Make the Best Moves to Save on Your 2025 Taxes
Don't wait until January — investors, including those with a high net worth, can snag big tax savings for 2025 (and 2026) with these strategies.
-
4 Smart Ways Retirees Can Give More to Charity, From a Financial AdviserFor retirees, tax efficiency and charitable giving should go hand in hand. After all, why not maximize your gifts and minimize the amount that goes to the IRS?
-
I'm an Insurance Pro: If You Do One Boring Task Before the End of the Year, Make It This One (It Could Save You Thousands)Who wants to check insurance policies when there's fun to be had? Still, making sure everything is up to date (coverage and deductibles) can save you a ton.
-
Small Caps Hit a New High on Rate-Cut Hope: Stock Market TodayOdds for a December rate cut remain high after the latest batch of jobs data, which helped the Russell 2000 outperform today.
-
Should You Tap Your Home Equity Before 2026?As borrowing rates and tax law shifts converge, here's what homeowners need to know before pulling equity out of their home.
-
What Investors May Face in the New Year: InterviewKeith Lerner, the chief market strategist and chief investment officer for Truist Wealth, speaks with Kiplinger.
-
3 Year-End Tax Strategies for Retirees With $2 Million to $10 MillionTo avoid the OBBB messing up your whole tax strategy, get your Roth conversions and charitable bunching done by year's end.
-
'Politics' Is a Dirty Word for Some Financial Advisers: 3 Reasons This Financial Planner Vehemently DisagreesYour financial plan should be aligned with your values and your politics. If your adviser refuses to talk about them, it's time to go elsewhere.
