“One of the things that can lead to an employment lawsuit,” observes Southern California-based labor law attorney Jay Rosenlieb, “is a failed interview that resulted in a job offer.
“Often the ‘hiring manager’ is a long-term employee with no training in how to conduct a proper, focused interview, hired the applicant based on liking them and not on whether they could do the job, would be a good fit or had the necessary experience.”
Anna Papalia, author of the recently published Interviewology: The New Science of Interviewing, could not agree more.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Papalia’s professional career has been devoted to teaching the art and science of employment interviews — to both employers and job applicants — helping them prepare, conduct and honestly present themselves.
I asked her to outline some of the worst ways an employment interview can be conducted and mistakes job applicants make during interviews.
1. An interviewer should not talk 80% of the time, focusing only on telling the candidate a lot of things about the job — telegraphing their needs — and then ask, “So why do you want to work here?”
Consequences: The candidate will repeat everything they just heard, giving a false impression of their competence that nonetheless impresses the interviewer. Instead, have a structured interview for all candidates, asking the same questions that have been written out in advance, rather than thinking of questions on the spot.
A hiring manager needs to determine what technical skills and personality attributes are required and present candidates with a challenging situation to see how they would handle it.
2. Both interviewers and job seekers need to guard against being swayed by someone who is like them.
Consequences: If the interviewer is a charmer — someone who wants to make a connection — they could like an applicant who is also charming and then fall prey to their personality. It could lead to being conned!
Attorney Rosenlieb points out, “Charmers can sometimes cause an inexperienced or inattentive hiring manager to discount a background check or pre-employment testing — ironically, devices that are in place, in part, to protect against charmers.”
Challengers love people who provide a new perspective, are contrarians and maintain a strong position. Examiners prefer business-minded, focused applicants who get right to the point — no fluff. Harmonizers look for an individual who is collaborative, warm and places the needs of the team above their own. They will all be swayed by someone who is like them.
3. Job seekers should never ask a hiring manager, “What’s going on in the company, and how can I help with some of the problems you’re having?”
Consequences: It’s a bad question. While challengers love tough questions, not everyone is a challenger. So if the applicant asks that question of an HR person, it risks rubbing them the wrong way, as they likely do not know the answer. You have to know to whom to direct your question.
A better approach would be along the lines of, “I’ve done my research and know you are looking to get into the XYZ market. As you can see from my résumé, I’ve done that before and would love to help you.”
4. Job seekers should absolutely never ask, “Can you describe for me the person you don’t want to hire?
Consequences: They are not going to tell you and might even think, “Why that question? Is there something off with their personality? We don’t need someone who is difficult!”
Instead, any question you ask or answer should move the interview forward so the interviewer has a good impression and sees you as qualified. So, before asking a question, ask yourself, “Will this show me as qualified? Will I appear likable? Will they be interested in talking with me more?”
Also, asking the interviewer “why?” can shut people down, but asking them “how?” helps create a more conversational situation.
5. The most inappropriate, or even illegal, questions are often asked in the small-talk portion of the interview.
Example:
Question: “Did you have any trouble finding us?”
Answer: “No trouble at all.”
Question: “Oh, where do you live?”
What if the applicant says they live an hour away? This can lead to bias, as the hiring manager might think, “I don’t want to hire someone who lives an hour away.”
Or, what if the applicant says they live in a bad neighborhood? This leads to making assumptions about people based on things that have nothing to do with the job.
Questions that go beyond the job requirements and skills necessary are generally discouraged during the interview process. The risk is that you could drift into areas that raise an inference of discrimination.
Also an issue: “My three kids go to XYZ School.”
Interviewer might think: “Do I want to hire someone with the obligations of raising three children?”
Concluding our interview, Papalia made clear the message that a job interview is not “just a getting-to-know-you date.”
“Will this person be a good fit for the job? Once they are hired, of course the doors are wide open to all sorts of discussions — but not beforehand.”
Interviewology is a true gift to employers and job seekers and perfect for graduates.
Dennis Beaver practices law in Bakersfield, Calif., and welcomes comments and questions from readers, which may be faxed to (661) 323-7993, or e-mailed to Lagombeaver1@gmail.com. And be sure to visit dennisbeaver.com.
Related Content
- Four Easy Ways to Get Yourself Fired
- Looking for a Job? Here’s How Not to Get Hired
- Older Doctor Just Wants to Work, But New HR Boss Changes the Rules
- Over 50? You’re a Hot Ticket in Today’s Labor Market
- What 89% of Workers Are Willing to Give Up Their Job For
-
I'm a Financial Pro: This Is How You Can Guide Your Heirs Through the Great Wealth TransferFocus on creating a clear estate plan, communicating your wishes early to avoid family conflict, leaving an ethical will with your values and wisdom and preparing them practically and emotionally.
-
To Reap the Full Benefits of Tax-Loss Harvesting, Consider This Investment Strategist's StepsTax-loss harvesting can offer more advantages for investors than tax relief. Over the long term, it can potentially help you maintain a robust portfolio and build wealth.
-
Social Security Wisdom From a Financial Adviser Receiving Benefits HimselfYou don't know what you don't know, and with Social Security, that can be a costly problem for retirees — one that can last a lifetime.
-
Take It From a Tax Expert: The True Measure of Your Retirement Readiness Isn't the Size of Your Nest EggA sizable nest egg is a good start, but your plan should include two to five years of basic expenses in conservative, liquid accounts as a buffer against market volatility, inflation and taxes.
-
New Opportunity Zone Rules Triple Tax Benefits for Rural Investments: Here's Your 2027 StrategyNew IRS guidance just reshaped the opportunity zone landscape for 2027. Here's what high-net-worth investors need to know about the enhanced rural benefits.
-
The OBBB Ushers in a New Era of Energy Investing: What You Need to Know About Tax Breaks and MoreThe new tax law has changed the energy investing landscape with expanded incentives and permanent tax benefits for oil and gas production.
-
Ten Ways Family Offices Can Build Resilience in a Volatile WorldFamily offices are shifting their global investment priorities and goals in the face of uncertainty, volatile markets and the influence of younger generations.
-
Should Your Brokerage Firm Be Your Bookie? A Financial Professional Weighs InSome brokerage firms are promoting 'event contracts,' which are essentially yes-or-no wagers, blurring the lines between investing and gambling.
