1 Tax Shift Most People Miss in Retirement

See if you can spot the flaw in this couple’s plan:

A husband and wife are retiring next month at age 62, with an equal amount saved in retirement and non-retirement accounts (let’s call it $500,000 each).

Like most, over their lifetimes they have emphasized higher-growth assets in their retirement accounts (IRAs, 401(k)s, etc.), which are invested almost entirely in stocks. By contrast, their non-retirement accounts are far more conservative, since they were more likely to tap those over the years for expenses like college, a home upgrade or an emergency. Those accounts are more bond-heavy, with a particular emphasis on tax-free municipal bonds.

Subscribe to Kiplinger’s Personal Finance

Be a smarter, better informed investor.

Save up to 74%

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters

Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger’s expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.

Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger’s expert advice - straight to your e-mail.

Sign up

Between the two sleeves of their portfolio, their aggregate asset allocation is fairly well-balanced going into retirement.

The Problem

This couple has followed well-established financial planning practices up to this point. However, there is one major tax-planning principle that changes in retirement that they have overlooked, and if they continue down their current path, they will pay more taxes than necessary.

Entering retirement, rather than emphasizing stocks in your retirement accounts, consider overweighting them in your non-retirement accounts instead. To keep your overall allocation intact, simply do the opposite with bonds. There are several reasons why this is a superior approach in retirement:

1. Favorable tax treatment for stocks. In taxable accounts, qualified dividends and long-term capital gains are taxed at lower rates than ordinary income. However, you lose this favorable tax treatment when holding equities in your retirement accounts.
2. Higher bond yields. Holding bonds in an IRA eliminates the need for lower-yielding municipal bonds. For an equivalent amount of risk, you can purchase higher-yielding taxable bonds.
3. Minimization of required minimum distributions (RMDs). Emphasizing fixed income in your IRAs slows down the growth of that sleeve of the portfolio, keeping RMDs in check.
4. Estate planning. From the perspective of your heirs, it’s far better for your non-retirement accounts to grow faster than your IRAs. Non-retirement accounts receive a step-up in basis, so the beneficiary of an appreciated stock account can immediately deploy the asset as desired without triggering taxes. By contrast, IRA beneficiaries pay ordinary income tax on any withdrawals, and must navigate separate RMD rules if they stretch distributions over their life expectancy.
5. Income tax control. Most importantly, directing non-retirement assets into tax-efficient equity investments like ETFs or individual positions can be the cornerstone of a comprehensive tax mitigation plan, since you can control the timing and amount of realized gains.

Several major retirement expenses are affected by your level of reportable income:

• Long-term capital gains tax rate
• Tax rate on qualified dividends
• Medicare Part B premiums
• Taxation of Social Security benefits
• Health insurance premiums prior to age 65 (as described in a previous column here).

Reducing taxes at every opportunity can minimize your portfolio withdrawal rate in early retirement, which is a key factor in determining whether your money can last over your lifetime.

The Fix

It’s easy to understand why this couple fell into a backward tax position entering retirement, since asset location strategies (the process of deciding which account type should hold various asset classes) are so different from your working years.

Eventually, they saw the light and flip-flopped their asset location. They moved their retirement accounts mostly into bonds, and their non-retirement accounts entirely into stocks.

Rather than reinvesting stock dividends, they now sweep them to cash to fund their living expenses. The rest of their expenses are covered by a combination of IRA withdrawals and stock sales, all carefully calibrated to keep them below the top of the 15% federal income tax bracket. This not only keeps their IRA withdrawals tax-efficient, but also allows them to qualify for a 0% federal tax rate on their long-term capital gains and qualified dividends (as explained in an earlier column here).

In running the numbers, they found this strategy significantly increased their spendable income, and added years to the longevity of their portfolio.

Taking Action

The general principles here apply in most cases in retirement, even if you are in a higher tax bracket. No matter your income, long-term capital gains and qualified dividends are always taxable at a lower rate than ordinary income. For that reason, you should strongly consider emphasizing stocks in your non-retirement accounts at this stage in life.

One exception is if you employ high-turnover stock strategies or mutual funds. Those are better suited for your IRAs in order to avoid triggering short-term capital gains taxes.

Minimizing income taxes is a powerful way to potentially add years to your portfolio, with no need to outguess the markets. If your portfolio is upside-down from a tax perspective, turning it around it could significantly strengthen your retirement.

Yoder Wealth Management does not provide tax advice.