Focus on Protecting Your Nest Egg Once You're Retired
How much do you really need to earn on your investments once you retire? Figure it out, and then don't take one more iota of risk than necessary.


If you’re like most investors, you’ve focused on making money for most of your financial life. But once you’re retired or close to retirement, I believe you need to shift gears, to put protection ahead of growth in order to make your savings last.
SEE ALSO: Is 4% Withdrawal Rate Still a Good Retirement Rule of Thumb?
In other words, I suggest you should only take as much risk as is necessary to accomplish your financial goals.
Calculate How Much Return You Really Need
Let's say you’ve done extremely well with your savings and investments over the years. You have $10 million in savings and live on $100,000 a year, so your cost of living is basically 1%. If you earned just 1% on your money, you’d never tap into your nest egg at all. I’d say you’ve won the game, and that you shouldn't risk that win. If you were the coach of a football team that was ahead by 10 points in the fourth quarter, would you tell your players to do anything that could cost you the game? I wouldn’t, and I’d say the same to an investor.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
If you have $10 million and only need a 1% return to support your lifestyle, I believe you should have no stock market risk. At that rate, you could probably put your money in a savings account and make enough to support your lifestyle.
It can be tempting to take a risk, especially when the market is bullish, but let me ask you this: If I could somehow guarantee you that a 2% rate of return would keep you financially secure for the rest of your life, would you take that rate — even if it didn’t beat the S&P? I think most people would take that deal and be really happy that they never had to worry about money again.
That’s why I believe that your retirement income is more important than the percentage return on your money.
What If You’re Not as Well Off?
But what if you only had $100,000 saved and you needed $10,000 a year to support your lifestyle? That would mean you needed a 10% rate of return. Would I advise you to chase a 10% return? No. I’d argue that that there’s no way to get that rate consistently.
Yes, the average annual return for the S&P 500 since its inception is 10%, but once you adjust for inflation, the average drops to around 7%. And there’s a bigger problem: That rate is an average from 1926 through 2018. The rate is nowhere as consistent in smaller increments of time. The average rate of return in 2007 was just 5.48% — and in 2008 it was -36.55%.
And to reiterate the point of this article: If you chase high returns, you are taking high risks. When you were working, you might have been able to cover some of your losses with your salary. But once you’re retired, you’re not just risking your nest egg: You’re risking income that helps to cover your cost of living. You’re running the risk of becoming poor.
See Also: How Can I Estimate the Income I'll Need in Retirement?
Two Options to Address Your Shortfall
Since attempting high returns is too risky, what can you do to make ends meet in retirement if your savings are falling short of your spending needs? Before you consider amping up your stock market risk to make up for the shortfall, first I’d suggest you take a hard look at your expenses instead.
Cost-cutting is difficult for most people. The term implies eliminating something you do—and probably do for enjoyment rather than necessity, or else it wouldn’t be on the table as a cost-cutting option. Instead, I advise people whose lifestyles outstrip their financial capabilities to reduce quantity. For example, I don’t suggest they stop playing golf, but cut back from playing from five days a week to playing three. If they’re eating out three times a week, I suggest they dine out once weekly.
It makes sense: If you want to lose weight, you don't stop eating, you just eat less. This “reduction in quantity” is the same sort of idea. If you manage quantity, the expenses will take care of themselves.
And if cost cutting doesn’t get you far enough? Well, there’s another thing you may need to do: Consider working longer, or, if you’re already retired, go back to work.
A Different Way to Think About Retirement
If you think my version of financial planning for retirement looks more like cash flow analysis than a typical investment plan, you’d be right. My job as a financial adviser is to help my clients’ money last as long as they do. I think that’s your job as an investor, too. And I think the best way to do that is to take only as much risk as you need to support your standard of living.
See Also: Want a Second Passport? Here Are 3 Countries You Can Buy Your Way Into the EU
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Ken Moraif is the CEO and founder of Retirement Planners of America (RPOA), a Dallas-based wealth management and investment firm with over $3.58 billion in assets under management and serving 6,635 households in 48 states (as of Dec. 31, 2023).
-
The Upscale Upgrades Coming to a Country Club Near You
Young country club members expect more from their fees than access to a golf course. From teen rec rooms to red-light therapy, this is how clubs are upgrading.
-
I claimed Social Security six months ago at 62, but my checks are too small. What are my options?
We asked financial experts for advice.
-
Five Retirement Planning Traps You Can't Afford to Fall Into, From a Wealth Adviser
To help ensure you reach your savings goals and enjoy financial security in your golden years, be aware of these common pitfalls. The key is to be proactive, informed and flexible.
-
Your 401(k) Can Now Include Alternative Assets, But Should It? A Financial Adviser Weighs In
Many employer-sponsored plans offer limited investment options, which can stunt growth. But participants considering alternatives might need some sound advice to get the most from their accounts.
-
Will Taxes Shred Your 401(k) or IRA During Your Retirement? It's Very Likely
Conventional wisdom dictates that you save in a 401(k) now and pay taxes later, but turning that rule on its head could leave you far better off. A financial planner explains why.
-
More Retirees Are Renting: Should You? A Financial Adviser Weighs In
In some ways, renting is cheaper, more flexible and easier, but unless you understand the implications for your taxes and health costs, it might not be for you.
-
I'm a Real Estate Investing Pro: This 1031 Exchange Strategy Can Triple Your Cash Flow
Savvy investors can use 1031 exchanges to unlock value by moving capital across markets in a play called geographic arbitrage. These tax implications can make or break the strategy.
-
I'm an Insurance Pro: Everyone Needs to Prepare for Earthquakes, Even if You Don't Live Near a Fault Line
Here are my tips for what to do before, during and after an earthquake. The more prepared you are, the more you'll be able to keep your wits about you if it happens.
-
Where There's a Will, There's a Way Your Assets Will Be Distributed as You Wish
Your will is the backbone of a strong, adaptable estate plan that ensures what you leave behind goes to your selected beneficiaries. Without a will, state laws determine who gets your assets.
-
I'm a Financial Adviser: This Is What You're Really Losing if You Cut Back on Your 401(k) Contributions
Missing out on the benefits of the employer match and compounding growth could force you to work longer and lower your standard of living in retirement. Here are some alternative options.