5 Gold-Rated Funds to Beat the Market
The Morningstar Medalist rating gives us confidence that these picks should outpace the indexes over the long haul.
Index funds are all the rage nowadays—and why not? Over the past 10 years, fewer than one-third of actively managed U.S. stock funds beat their benchmark indexes. But if you want to find funds that, on average, beat their benchmarks, one good place to turn to is Morningstar, the Chicago-based investment research outfit.
Five years ago, Morningstar launched its Morningstar Medalist ratings. The firm’s analysts pick their favorite funds by looking at both quantitative and qualitative factors, then divide their top picks into gold, silver and bronze medalists. The analysts have the most confidence in gold-rated funds, the second most confidence in silver and the third most confidence in bronze.
Over the past five years, a majority of the medalists have beaten their benchmark indexes. Nearly 60% of gold-medalist funds outperformed their benchmark, 54% of silver funds beat their index, and 53% of bronze funds came out ahead.
How do Morningstar analysts pick funds that they think will do well? They start by looking for low costs and strong returns, adjusted for market volatility. But the analysts also include some data points that are difficult for individual investors to evaluate on their own.
Morningstar employs more than 100 fund analysts. They visit fund companies and get to know the managers, research analysts and executives through continuing interviews by phone and in person. “We’ve covered most of our medalists for many years,” says Russ Kinnel, Morningstar’s director of manager research.
Among the questions the analysts endeavor to answer: Do the fund’s managers have a competitive advantage that enables them to execute a sound strategy consistently over time? How talented is the manager or managers? How good are the analysts who research the securities owned by the fund? What kind of company runs the fund? Is its corporate culture one of salesmanship or stewardship?
Morningstar’s fund analysts present a tentative rating to a committee for approval. The committee then discusses the rating and ensures that all the needed work has been done before the company issues a final rating.
Only 350 funds currently have five-year records as medalists. Before it came out with its medalist rankings, Morningstar singled out its favorite funds as “analyst picks.” The methodology was slightly different, but it was also successful, more often than not, in picking market-beating funds.
Below are descriptions of some of my favorite gold-rated funds. Returns are as of March 3.
AMG Yacktman Fund Class I (YACKX) lost founding manager Don Yacktman to retirement last year, although he remains an adviser. But Yacktman’s son Stephen and comanager Jason Subotky have been ably doing most of the day-to-day work on the fund for many years. The fund looks for high-quality companies with stocks that sell at depressed prices. Nearly one-third of the fund’s holdings are low-risk companies that make everyday necessities. And 20% of the fund is in cash. That risk-averse positioning has hurt relative returns—the fund has lagged Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index over the past five years. But I believe patient investors will be rewarded. This fund is a keeper.
American Funds International Growth and Income F-1 (IGIFX), like all American funds, is available through several online brokerages, including Fidelity and Schwab, without an initial sales charge. At $11 billion in assets, this is one of the smallest, and therefore most nimble, of the firm’s funds—one of the reasons I like it. Despite the fund’s name, its yield is only 2.3%. The four managers are each responsible individually for a portion of the portfolio.
Dodge & Cox Stock (DODGX), a member of the Kiplinger 25, is a venerable, low-cost, conservative, large-company fund with a focus on bargain-priced stocks. The fund trailed the Russell 100 Value index for 2 1/2 years until the second half of 2016, and it fared even worse against the S&P 500. But it has since returned to its winning ways. The fund buys stocks of companies facing temporary difficulties, then holds on patiently.
Oakmark Fund (OAKMX) has profited recently from a 35% stake in financials. The sector rose 22% in 2016. Veteran comanagers Bill Nygren and Kevin Grant often find value in places others don’t. The fund’s long-term record is superb. Over the past 10 years it returned an annualized 9.2%—an average of 1.3 percentage points a year better than the S&P 500.
T. Rowe Price Real Estate (TRREX) has been managed capably since its inception in 1997 by David Lee. Lee and his team look for well-managed real estate investment trusts that are likely to keep growing, with shares that trade below the net asset value of the underlying properties. Lee is incredibly patient; turnover is less than 10% annually, which means that in the course of a year, the fund changes fewer than one in 10 holdings.
The real trick with actively managed funds, in my view, isn’t so much picking good funds initially (although that’s not easy). The hardest part is sticking with active funds during the inevitable years when they lag their benchmarks. Even the best of funds will go through two-year or three-year periods when they trail their indexes. Holding on and not selling can be incredibly difficult—particularly if a fund lags by a lot. Owning a fund with a Morningstar gold rating can help you remain patient during the bad times.
Steve Goldberg is an investment adviser in the Washington, D.C., area.