For much of 2006, it must have seemed as though the sky was falling for shareholders of XM Satellite Radio. The stock (symbol XMSR) had plunged from $30 to a little more than $11 before the opening of trading Tuesday. There were good reasons for the decline: Customers weren't renewing at anticipated rates, and the Federal Communications Commission was leaning on the company because satellite radio car receivers were interfering with FM reception in nearby vehicles.
But then Bear Stearns analyst Robert Peck issued a report that turned his "underperform" rating to "outperform." Peck figures that the bad news has largely run its course, and that the market has overreacted. It certainly reacted to his upgrade, as XM's stock soared 20% on Tuesday to close at $13.52. The rally spilled over to rival Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI), whose shares climbed 3.6%, to $4.03.
Peck listed 12 reasons why XM's stock should perform better. On top of the list: XM and the FCC are about to reach an agreement on toned-down receivers that will still deliver great audio; sales at retailers are holding up and should pick up for the 2006 holiday season; the company has enough cash to get it through these tough times; and management is stronger. Also, despite shock jock Howard Stern's move to Sirius and Sirius's recent deals with the National Football League and Nascar, XM's programming is sound enough to maintain its audience's loyalty and attract new listeners.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Peck says his $17 target price on XM stock by the end of 2007 is based on conservative numbers. The company, for example, is predicting 18 million to 19 million subscribers by 2010, but Peck is figuring just 16.5 million.
Still, this is not a stock for chicken-hearted investors. Analysts, on average, expect XM to lose $2.63 a share this year and $1.79 a share in 2007. Peck is slightly less negative, seeing a loss of $2.61 per share this year and $1.52 next.
-
Dow Trims Its Loss to 498 Points: Stock Market TodayMarkets are wondering more and more about returns on the enormous amounts of capital hyperscalers are investing in AI.
-
5 Mark Cuban Quotes Every Retiree Should Live ByThe billionaire businessman and Shark Tank alum has some advice that may surprise you.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Home Depot Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayHome Depot stock has been a buy-and-hold banger for truly long-term investors.
-
What the Rich Know About Investing That You Don'tPeople like Warren Buffett become people like Warren Buffett by following basic rules and being disciplined. Here's how to accumulate real wealth.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Bank of America Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayBank of America stock has been a massive buy-and-hold bust.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Oracle Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayORCL Oracle stock has been an outstanding buy-and-hold bet for decades.
-
How to Invest for Rising Data Integrity RiskAmid a broad assault on venerable institutions, President Trump has targeted agencies responsible for data critical to markets. How should investors respond?
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Sherwin-Williams Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodaySherwin-Williams stock has clobbered the broader market by a wide margin for a long time.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into UnitedHealth Group Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayUNH stock was a massive market beater for ages — until it wasn't.
-
What Tariffs Mean for Your Sector ExposureNew, higher and changing tariffs will ripple through the economy and into share prices for many quarters to come.
