Whirlpool: Classic Value
The appliance maker has so far fought off the housing slump and fears that it blundered when it bought Maytag. Yet the stock has as many detractors as it has supporters.
When a successful company buys a lesser and troubled rival, you have to think about the makers of Mercedes-Benz and why on earth they tortured themselves with Chrysler. Similarly, Whirlpool took a huge chance by buying Maytag a year ago for $2.8 billion in cash, stock and assumed debt. Besides paying dearly for a famous but lagging brand, a company Whirlpool candidly described afterwards as hindered by high production costs and lack of innovation, the buyout coincided with a downturn in homebuilding and remodeling. Housing was still rollicking when Whirlpool cooked up the transaction in the middle of 2005.
Whirlpool justified the acquisition by assuming $400 million in savings, or a good year’s total profit, from the combined companies. After closing some Maytag plants, Whirlpool expects to reach these savings by the end of 2007. Moreover, Whirlpool says the acquisition allows it to expand its presence in stores and fill a few holes in product lines, despite already being the dominant brand in the U.S and owning major brands in Europe and Latin America.
Whirlpool has defended the merger aggressively, a strategy that’s won it time from Wall Street to put up or shut up. So far, it appears the combination is working. In mid February, Whirlpool reported that it earned $6.35 per share in 2006, ahead of the $6 to $6.25 the company had predicted at merger time and the $5.50 to $6 that analysts had been forecasting. The good showing came largely from increased sales overseas, although some deferred capital spending contributed to the positive surprise. And the company produced enough cash flow to work off some of the acquisition debt. The stock (symbol WHR), which fell from $91 to the $70s soon after the completion of the merger, has recovered all of its losses. It closed at $94.44 on February 21, down 1.5% for the day.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
At the same time they announced 2006 results, Whirlpool’s brass forecast earnings of $9 a share this year. Given that Whirlpool hasn’t experience year-to-year earnings gains of that magnitude since 2002 and 2003, the forecast seems awfully aggressive. Such bears as Citigroup analyst Jeffrey Sprague don’t see $9 as a remote possibility. He cites higher costs for such materials as steel and copper in contending that it’s just as plausible that Whirlpool earnings will fall than rise by some 40%. Sprague recommends selling the stock.
Whirlpool’s retort to Sprague and other doubters is that higher prices, new products (there are cool new high-end washers and dryers ready to ship) and more economizing will leverage the profits. If the company is right, and Whirlpool maintains its price-earnings ratio of about 14, there is enormous upside in the stock, to as much as $125 in the coming year.
The deciding factor appears to be what happens to housing starts. If they plunge more, Whirlpool is in trouble. If they don’t, and mortgage rates stay low enough so that enough people move and remodel, appliance sales will exceed expectations. One thing the Maytag acquisition did -- and why this situation isn’t entirely like DaimlerChrysler -- is result in a near-monopoly. Chinese appliance makers are competitors on the low end, but after them and GE, this business is a one-horse race. Whirlpool’s stock may be weak in the first half of the year. If it retreats, as it did in 2006, it could be a classic value opportunity.
-
Americans, Even With Higher Incomes, Are Feeling the SqueezeA 50-year mortgage probably isn’t the answer, but there are other ways to alleviate the continuing sting of high prices
-
Hiding the Truth From Your Financial Adviser Can Cost YouHiding assets or debt from a financial adviser damages the relationship as well as your finances. If you're not being fully transparent, it's time to ask why.
-
How to Manage a Disagreement With Your Financial AdviserKnowing how to deal with a disagreement can improve both your finances and your relationship with your planner.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Caterpillar Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayCaterpillar stock has been a remarkably resilient market beater for a very long time.
-
I'm a 55-Year-Old Dad. Here’s How My 28-Year-Old Daughter Showed Me That AXP Is Still a Solid InvestmentAmerican Express stock is still a solid investment because management understands the value of its brand and is building a wide moat around it.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into AMD Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayAdvanced Micro Devices stock is soaring thanks to AI, but as a buy-and-hold bet, it's been a market laggard.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into UPS Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayUnited Parcel Service stock has been a massive long-term laggard.
-
How the Stock Market Performed in the First Year of Trump's Second TermSix months after President Donald Trump's inauguration, take a look at how the stock market has performed.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Lowe's Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayLowe's stock has delivered disappointing returns recently, but it's been a great holding for truly patient investors.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into 3M Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayMMM stock has been a pit of despair for truly long-term shareholders.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Coca-Cola Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayEven with its reliable dividend growth and generous stock buybacks, Coca-Cola has underperformed the broad market in the long term.
