Advertisement
Index Funds

The Trouble with Index Funds

You’ll need to look elsewhere for protection from the full brunt of the next bear market.

Nowadays everybody loves index funds. What’s not to love? On average, index funds outpace roughly two-thirds of actively managed funds. And because most major market indexes are way up since the nadir of the bear market on March 9, 2009, anyone who has been in an index fund since then has undoubtedly earned a lot of money.

Consider just a few performance numbers: Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index has returned an annualized 25.6% (192.2% on a cumulative basis). The Russell 2000 index of small companies has done even better, soaring an annualized 29.9% (242.2% cumulative). The MSCI EAFE index, which follows stocks in developed foreign markets, has risen an annualized 20.8% (143.2% cumulative). Even Barclays Aggregate U.S. Bond index, which tracks the high-quality part of the domestic bond market, has gained an annualized 5.1%, or a cumulative 26.5%. (All returns are through November 19.)

Advertisement - Article continues below

Any half-decently run index fund has matched the returns of those indexes, minus 0.1 or 0.2 percentage point to account for fund expenses. So why bother with any other kind of fund?

Here’s the rub: Stock-index funds seek to reflect the overall stock market, and that means tracking the market’s downs as well as its ups. Most investors want to be cushioned from the brunt of bear markets, and actively managed funds are a better place to look for that protection. That’s why a mix of index funds and actively managed funds may be your best bet as an investor.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

It’s no coincidence that index funds have increased in popularity during the current bull market. The charm will likely fade for many during the next bear market. During the last bear market, when the S&P 500 plunged 55.3%, many investors flocked to actively managed funds that promised some relief from the pain—whether by holding cash or bonds or buying stocks that were less volatile than those that dominate the S&P 500, the most popular index for passive funds.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Don’t get me wrong. There’s a lot to like about broad-based index mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, most of which track indexes. (I’d avoid most of the narrow ETFs, which are proliferating like rabbits.) Index funds are cheap, especially if they come from a low-cost firm such as Vanguard. It’s easy to pick index funds; you don’t have to pore over newsletters, fund reports and magazine articles. Index funds are tax-friendly in that they don’t pay out big capital gains the way actively managed funds do. Finally, broad index funds offer diversification—the one free lunch in investing.

But don’t put all your money in index funds, especially if you’re worried about the next vicious bear market. That’s ample reason to favor funds that should produce solid returns in good markets but that also held up relatively well in the 2007-09 massacre. For example, FPA Crescent (symbol FPACX) lost only 27.9% during the bloodbath, compared with a 55.3% plunge for the S&P 500. Others that held up reasonably well were Matthews Asian Growth & Income (MACSX), down 39.4%, Vanguard Dividend Growth (VDIGX), off 42.3%, and Yacktman Fund (YACKX), down 46.5%.

Advertisement - Article continues below
Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

Index funds don’t have those shock absorbers. “There are a lot of good defensive strategies in active management,” says Russel Kinnel, director of fund research at Morningstar. Of course, the trick is to find good actively managed funds. Many actively run funds lost as much as or more than index funds during the last bear market.

When to use index funds? Start with large-company U.S. stocks. These companies are so widely followed and so carefully scrutinized by investors and analysts that it’s difficult for active managers to add value through their stock-picking skills. Large foreign companies in the developed world are almost as thoroughly researched.

When to use actively managed funds? When you can find a relatively low-cost fund that has produced strong risk-adjusted results compared with its benchmark over a long period (at least five years) under the same manager.

In more normal times, index fund investors could sensibly reduce their portfolio’s overall volatility simply by increasing their allocations to bonds and cash. But these are still not normal times, and the outlook for high-quality bonds, particularly bond index funds, many of which are filled with government debt, is dismal. Even John Bogle, the former Vanguard Group chief who was instrumental in bringing index funds to the masses, says to avoid generic bond index funds because they own too many government bonds, which are especially susceptible to rising interest rates (bond prices and rates move in opposite directions). And cash, of course, is earning almost nothing.

Advertisement - Article continues below

For most of my money, I’d rather have a manager such as FPA Crescent’s Steve Romick decide how much to invest in stocks, bonds and cash—and have him change those allocations a bit as opportunities emerge. Or I’d like a fund such as Yacktman, which takes a low-risk approach to the markets by loading up on inexpensive, high-quality stocks.

Low-volatility funds, which are becoming more popular, are intriguing. They start with a regular index and remove its most-volatile stocks. But these funds are too new and untested for me to trust yet. The ones I’ve looked at have big exposures to some industry sectors and little to others. They’re not truly index funds—at least they don’t fully reflect the overall market.

To me, a mix of index and actively managed funds makes the most sense. That way you keep your costs low and keep your risks relatively low, too.

Steven T. Goldberg is an investment adviser in the Washington, D.C., area.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Most Popular

Turning 60 in 2020? Expect Lower Social Security Benefits
Coronavirus and Your Money

Turning 60 in 2020? Expect Lower Social Security Benefits

When you file for Social Security, the amount you receive may be lower.
July 30, 2020
These 2 Words Could Send Your Retirement Money to the Wrong Beneficiary
estate planning

These 2 Words Could Send Your Retirement Money to the Wrong Beneficiary

"Per stirpes" vs. "per capita." Making the wrong choice could cause an estate planning disaster.
July 30, 2020
Second Stimulus Check Update: HEALS Act vs. CARES Act
taxes

Second Stimulus Check Update: HEALS Act vs. CARES Act

When compared to first-round payments, the new Republican stimulus check proposal expands and protects payments for some people, but it shuts the door…
July 29, 2020

Recommended

Stock Market Today 7/31/20: Big Tech Roars, Everyone Else Snores
Markets

Stock Market Today 7/31/20: Big Tech Roars, Everyone Else Snores

Blowout earnings from Apple (AAPL), Amazon.com (AMZN) and Facebook (FB) led another charge by the Nasdaq on Friday.
July 31, 2020
Stock Market Today 7/30/20: Stocks Grind Through a Deluge of News
Markets

Stock Market Today 7/30/20: Stocks Grind Through a Deluge of News

The U.S. suffers its worst GDP drop in history, jobless claims rise and a host of other headlines converged to send the market to mixed results Thursd…
July 30, 2020
U.S. Suffers Worst-Ever 32.9% Annualized GDP Decline in Q2
investing

U.S. Suffers Worst-Ever 32.9% Annualized GDP Decline in Q2

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented collapse in economic activity.
July 30, 2020
Stock Market Today 7/29/20: Big Tech Gets Grilled; Stocks Keep Cooking
Markets

Stock Market Today 7/29/20: Big Tech Gets Grilled; Stocks Keep Cooking

Big Tech stocks pushed higher Wednesday as their CEOs were questioned on Capital Hill, and Kodak's (KODK) incredible ascent continued.
July 29, 2020