Why Can't I Give More to My Candidate's Campaign?
There should be immediate disclosure of every donation to every political fund of any kind. That’s crucial for a healthy democracy.
Q. I asked a candidate for a congressional seat how much I could lawfully contribute to his campaign committee, and he said just $2,700, which would have to be publicly disclosed. But some individuals (as well as corporations and unions) are pouring millions of dollars into political organizations that have no contribution limits and, in some cases, not even donor disclosure. Does this strike you as bizarre?
A. It sure does. Reasonable people can disagree on the big philosophical issues of campaign finance: Should all elections be publicly financed, with strict spending limits and no private donations allowed? Or, conversely, is campaign finance a First Amendment, free-speech right that shouldn’t be abridged by any restrictions on giving and spending?
But everyone should agree that after court rulings opened the floodgates for “independent” campaign donations—for good or ill—the 1970s-era restrictions on donations to particular candidates are pathetically archaic. We’re left with a patchwork of laws that make no sense—inconsistent, inscrutable and expensive to comply with.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
You are constrained in your giving to a candidate’s campaign. But megarich donors, such as conservative industrialists Charles and David Koch and liberal financiers Tom Steyer and George Soros, can give unlimited amounts to SuperPACs, which operate independently of a candidate’s committee. So can businesses and unions.
The most bizarre anomalies relate to disclosure. It’s required for donors to all traditional campaign committees, plus political action committees (PACs), SuperPACs and even certain nonprofit advocacy groups—which promote causes but do not expressly urge the election or defeat of a particular candidate. But one fast-growing species—501(c)(4) “social welfare” organizations—can collect and spend unlimited millions on general political advocacy, often without revealing the names and donated amounts of supporters.
The most needed reform—-modest but feasible in the current judicial and legislative climate—-would be immediate disclosure of every donation to every political fund of any kind. That’s crucial for a healthy democracy.
Have a money-and-ethics question you’d like answered in this column? Write to editor in chief Knight Kiplinger at ethics@kiplinger.com.
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Knight came to Kiplinger in 1983, after 13 years in daily newspaper journalism, the last six as Washington bureau chief of the Ottaway Newspapers division of Dow Jones. A frequent speaker before business audiences, he has appeared on NPR, CNN, Fox and CNBC, among other networks. Knight contributes to the weekly Kiplinger Letter.
-
Don't Waste Your Money on Bad Gifts. Try This Instead.Holiday Happiness These strategies, backed by behavioral finance, can help you find presents that your loved ones will truly enjoy.
-
5 Unique Book-Inspired Trips Across AmericaThere are five great trips to take across America that can immerse you in the culture of your favourite books.
-
Should Nondisclosure Agreements Be Banned in Sexual Harassment Settlements?Business Costs & Regulation Knight Kiplinger offers his advice on how companies can improve their handling of harassment problems.
-
Are Incentives to Lure New Businesses Fair to Current Employers?Business Costs & Regulation Job growth and spending at an existing firm should be worth just as much in incentives as new jobs and capital investment brought in from outside.
-
Should Employers Be Barred From Asking Job Applicants What They Earn?business The effort to ban the “What are you earning?” question is part of a broader movement to make all compensation totally transparent.
-
Should Minor-League Ballplayers Get a Big Pay Raise?business Pro athletes must keep their bodies and skills in shape 12 months a year, and all should be paid accordingly.
-
What Should Doctors and Drugmakers Do to Stop Painkiller Addiction?business Physicians and dentists need mandatory pain-management training, starting in medical and dental schools and continuing thereafter.
-
How Can We Discourage Bogus News Stories?Politics Only the big online advertising networks can cut off the lifeblood and reduce the financial incentive to create phony stories.
-
Should My Neighbor Be Allowed to Turn His House Into a Short-Term Rental?real estate It's a debate that is raging in all of America’s major cities.
-
Should a Criminal Record Rule Out a Job Applicant?business The goal is an appropriate balance between fairness to job applicants and the employer’s right—indeed, legal obligation—to create a workplace that is safe for employees, customers and business interests.