Economy Blame Game
When markets sour, it does not mean that someone or some institution must be blamed.
Who's to blame for the sorry mess the economy finds itself in? Is it former Federal Reserve chief Alan Greenspan, who failed to sound an alarm about "no doc-no income" loans and kept short-term interest rates too low for too long in an attempt to jump-start the economy early in this decade? Is it the investment banks that packaged and sold billions of dollars' worth of high-risk home loans, often bundled in complicated "tranches" that nobody really understood? Or perhaps it's the bond-rating agencies that stamped these loans AAA.
The answer is: all of them and none of them. Yes, they all contributed to the housing boom and the proliferation of subprime mortgages. But they were not out to deceive the public. Instead, it was the free-market zeitgeist, which encouraged the creation of easy-money mortgages and their enthusiastic purchase by yield-hungry investors, that ultimately led to the credit fiasco.
Out of reach. Don't lay the housing boom and subsequent bust only in the lap of Alan Greenspan. The surge in housing prices was a worldwide phenomenon that transcended U.S. monetary policy. The fall in long-term interest rates, made possible by low inflation and purchases by Asian countries sitting on huge trade surpluses, left interest costs on mortgages at near-record lows. Moreover, aging baby-boomers' desire for second homes pushed up prices, a situation clearly out of the government's control.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
What about the mortgage lenders? The demand by institutions and the public for high-yield mortgage investments was enormous. Investment banks that sold these loans were responding to legitimate market forces that enabled them to package and place hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of subprime mortgages.
In hindsight, it is easy to see that the packages of subprime loans were much riskier than had been assumed. But it is hard for a central bank to call the top or bottom of a market. As I have noted in the past, Greenspan's 1996 "irrational exuberance" speech came years before the stock market became excessively overvalued.
Furthermore, the rating agencies, such as Standard & Poor's and Moody's, properly responded to the historical data that they had been given. The data indicated that, on a national level, real estate prices rarely, if ever, declined. The agencies did not fully appreciate the risks. But that does not mean it was wrong for them to offer opinions.
In pointing out these facts, I am not excusing Greenspan, the rating agencies or investors for greatly underestimating the risks in this housing bubble. And I am appalled that the chief executives of many of the mortgage companies were "rewarded" with millions of dollars in severance pay after leaving their firms near bankruptcy.
But regulators and lenders should not be censured for trying to outguess the markets. Markets are certainly not always right, and free-market economies will always be subject to cycles. But free markets have led to economic prosperity, and they've maximized freedom for their participants.
The housing crisis has had some surprisingly benign results. The lending boom allowed the homeownership rate to hit a record high of 69.2% at the end of 2004, up 2.3 percentage points from five years earlier. Although the number of foreclosures is rising, most subprime borrowers are current with their mortgage payments or are working out a payment schedule with their lenders. Their homes are far more valuable to the economy than the hundreds of billions of dollars of fiber-optic cable (most of it now nearly worthless) that was laid during the tech bubble of the late 1990s.
When markets sour, it does not mean that someone or some institution must be blamed. As legions of football fans who bet on the Patriots in the Super Bowl know, being wrong does not mean being blameworthy.
Columnist Jeremy J. Siegel is a professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and the author of Stocks for the Long Run and The Future for Investors.
-
Nasdaq Drops 172 Points on MSFT AI Spend: Stock Market TodayMicrosoft, Meta Platforms and a mid-cap energy stock have a lot to say about the state of the AI revolution today.
-
Don't Overpay the IRS: 6 Tax Mistakes That Could Be Raising Your BillTax Tips Is your income tax bill bigger than expected? Here's how you should prepare for next year.
-
Flashback Finance: The Cost of Retiring the Year You Were BornJust like groceries, gas and home prices, the cost of retiring is subject to inflation. Here is a look at what it cost to retire in the year you were born.
-
Trump Reshapes Foreign PolicyThe Kiplinger Letter The President starts the new year by putting allies and adversaries on notice.
-
Congress Set for Busy WinterThe Kiplinger Letter The Letter editors review the bills Congress will decide on this year. The government funding bill is paramount, but other issues vie for lawmakers’ attention.
-
The Kiplinger Letter's 10 Forecasts for 2026The Kiplinger Letter Here are some of the biggest events and trends in economics, politics and tech that will shape the new year.
-
What to Expect from the Global Economy in 2026The Kiplinger Letter Economic growth across the globe will be highly uneven, with some major economies accelerating while others hit the brakes.
-
Amid Mounting Uncertainty: Five Forecasts About AIThe Kiplinger Letter With the risk of overspending on AI data centers hotly debated, here are some forecasts about AI that we can make with some confidence.
-
Worried About an AI Bubble? Here’s What You Need to KnowThe Kiplinger Letter Though AI is a transformative technology, it’s worth paying attention to the rising economic and financial risks. Here’s some guidance to navigate AI’s future.
-
Will AI Videos Disrupt Social Media?The Kiplinger Letter With the introduction of OpenAI’s new AI social media app, Sora, the internet is about to be flooded with startling AI-generated videos.
-
What Services Are Open During the Government Shutdown?
The Kiplinger Letter As the shutdown drags on, many basic federal services will increasingly be affected.
