Over the past few decades much has been written about the benefits of engaging in asset protection planning to protect one’s legacy from future unknown, unforeseen lawsuits and other third-party claims.
Anecdotally, I’ve seen that prospective plaintiffs are keen to settle their claims more quickly, and for far less, against those who have implemented lawful and timely asset protection planning strategies.
The Kiplinger Building Wealth program handpicks financial advisers and business owners from around the world to share retirement, estate planning and tax strategies to preserve and grow your wealth. These experts, who never pay for inclusion on the site, include professional wealth managers, fiduciary financial planners, CPAs and lawyers. Most of them have certifications including CFP®, ChFC®, IAR, AIF®, CDFA® and more, and their stellar records can be checked through the SEC or FINRA.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Lawsuits are no fun
Over 90% of lawsuits settle for one of two reasons: Doubt as to liability and doubt as to collectability.
A properly structured asset protection plan creates the latter and fosters a robust environment for a quick and relatively modest settlement. But, as anyone who has been the target of a civil lawsuit knows, “the process is the punishment” regardless of the outcome for either party.
The emotional and financial toll is the worst
Litigation is a cruel and distasteful process. Aside from the financial cost of lawyers, experts, time away from work and family and the fear of the unknown, there is an emotional cost that can bring most innocent people to the breaking point.
Plaintiff’s lawyers know this and often use the “process” of the legal system to exert maximum pain on the defendant — with the goal of getting a quick settlement to make the pain stop. Failure to prepare for this by effective asset protection planning leaves no way to “level the playing field” with the plaintiff.
Protecting assets by stashing them safely
Asset protection planning can remove the “profit from the pursuit,” thereby fostering a more robust environment for the parties to settle.
Here is an example that makes this point: Lawrence’s estate lawyer advised him to incorporate asset protection planning while planning his estate.
Besides the traditional family trust used to avoid probate at death and secure some level of asset privacy, the attorney recommended his client use various structures to move assets off of Lawrence’s balance sheet, such that he no longer owned those assets.
- His residence was placed in a single-member LLC (managed by Lawrence).
- The LLC interest was then placed in an irrevocable trust established in Nevada, a state that allows asset protection trusts. Lawrence then rented the home from the LLC at fair market rent, becoming a “tenant” of the property vs. being the owner.
- Lawrence placed his nonqualified retirement investment portfolio in an asset protection trust and has his life insurance policy held in an irrevocable life insurance trust.
- Lawrence’s rental properties were held in an irrevocable trust established for his children and grandchildren as part of his legacy planning, shifting the future appreciation from Lawrence’s gross estate and saving the estate taxes that would have otherwise been due at his death.
All of this planning was done at a time when Lawrence had no current, foreseeable or expectant lawsuit creditors, and he remained solvent after the planning was completed.
What these strategies accomplished
Should Lawrence find himself threatened with a legal claim, the plaintiff would learn the assets he thought belonged to Lawrence are no longer owned by him. Rather, they are held in structures not owned by Lawrence and administered by independent trustees.
The chances of the plaintiff successfully enforcing a judgment and recovering assets from these other structures could be disappointing for the plaintiff. Under these circumstances, a plaintiff is more motivated to talk settlement.
Looking for expert tips to grow and preserve your wealth? Sign up for Building Wealth, our free, twice-weekly newsletter.
They may even walk away from the lawsuit, rather than expend the time and money associated with bringing the claim, considering the prospect of not being able to enforce the judgment if successful.
Avoiding litigation entirely is the ultimate win
The result is that Lawrence will have not only protected his “treasure,” but more importantly, he avoided the litigation “process” and all that this encompasses as described above.
This translates into Lawrence securing peace of mind knowing that he wasn’t going to be financially devastated by an unforeseen lawsuit that didn’t go his way. And even if the plaintiff wasn’t deterred by Lawrence’s planning, it’s much less likely that Lawrence would have lost these assets to the judgment creditor.
Do you need an asset protection plan?
If your estate plan does not include “asset protection planning,” you will not have the tools to defend against an aggressive and ambitious lawyer from taking your assets and leaving you and your family vulnerable.
If you do not have asset protection planning as part of your estate planning, you may wish to do so in order to avoid a disastrous outcome.
The information in this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice.
Related Content
- Nine Types of Trusts for High-Net-Worth Estates
- How Trusts Can Be Used to Protect LLCs From Creditors
- Got Cash on Hand? How to Protect It from Lawsuits
- Protecting Your Home from Lawsuits with a Dynasty Trust
- Strengthen Your Family's Legacy Protection With a Beneficiary Controlled Trust
-
I'm a Financial Adviser: What I Would Tell My 18-Year-Old Self About MoneyI've built a business, weathered financial storms and learned that adulting includes understanding my finances. Here's how I wish I had been more financially responsible earlier.
-
A Case Study in Mismatched Fund ReturnsStock Market Why do a fund's returns sometimes differ from its underlying index? A longstanding legal principle holds the key.
-
I'm a Financial Adviser: What I Would Tell My 18-Year-Old Self About Money
I've built a business, weathered financial storms and learned that adulting includes understanding my finances. Here's how I wish I had been more financially responsible earlier.
-
A Case Study in Mismatched Fund Returns
Stock Market Why do a fund's returns sometimes differ from its underlying index? A longstanding legal principle holds the key.
-
The 'Second Law' of Retirement RulesThe second law of thermodynamics inspires this retirement rule, because “You do not rise to the level of your goals. You fall to the level of your systems.”
-
Retirement Reality Check: Four Risks You'll Want to Avoid at All CostsThere's no crystal ball for retirement planning, but the closest thing could be to consider the key risks you'll face in retirement and build a plan around them.
-
Eight Ways to Financially Plan Your Way Through Challenging TimesA chief wealth strategist makes some suggestions about how to better position yourself financially while coping with economic uncertainty.
-
Stock Market Today: Stocks Drop as Trump Takes Aim at EU, AppleThe commander in chief issued new tariff threats against the European Union and the iPhone maker.
-
Stocks vs Funds: Six Different Ways They Impact Your PortfolioWhat are the key differences between stocks and mutual funds — and which would be better suited to your portfolio? Here are six distinctions you need to know.
-
Five Reasons Roth Conversions and Pensions Work Well TogetherThis financial planner unpacks why Roth conversions can save you big-time on taxes if you're a retiree with a pension.
