The National Association of Realtors (NAR) has agreed to pay $418 million over four years and change certain rules to settle a series of lawsuits over the industry’s sales commission fees, a move expected to greatly decrease home-selling costs.
“No longer will homeowners be required under NAR rules to offer compensation to buyers agents," Michael Ketchmark, lead attorney for the plaintiffs in the case, told Kiplinger in an interview. The new rules "will return the sale of homes to the free market and allow technology to benefit sellers of homes."
Those changes will provide a huge opportunity for the cost of selling a home to drop dramatically, he added.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Be a smarter, better informed investor.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Under the settlement, which is pending court approval, NAR agreed to stop requiring homeowners to pay buyers agents commissions when they sell their homes, a practice in the U.S. that has been around for nearly 100 years, Ketchmark said. The average total commission rates in the U.S. — split between buyer and seller brokers — are 5% to 6% of the sale price, according to court documents.
NAR, which admits no wrongdoing in the case, has also agreed to draft new rules that prohibit broker compensation offers on its Multiple Listing Service (MLS) property database and that require MLS participants working with buyers to put their agreements in writing. These changes are set to become effective in mid-July.
The MLS has been used “as a vehicle for propping up and inflating commissions," Ketchmark said. “Probably the most significant part of the settlement is the changes to the way that homes are sold."
NAR, whose 1.5 million members make up the nation’s largest trade group, did not respond to a request for comment. In a statement, NAR sad it continues to encourage members to use buyer brokerage agreements that help consumers understand the services and value that will be provided.
“Ultimately, continuing to litigate would have hurt members and their small businesses,” Nykia Wright, interim CEO of NAR, said in the statement. “While there could be no perfect outcome, this agreement is the best outcome we could achieve in the circumstances.”
The settlement follows NAR’s loss in a district court case last October involving a conspiracy to artificially inflate commissions on home sales. A jury in that case ordered NAR and several real estate brokerages — including Berkshire Hathaway Energy-owned HomeServices of America — to pay about $1.8 billion in damages to roughly 500,000 home sellers in Missouri.
Non-negotiable commission rule challenged
In their suit, the home sellers challenged NAR’s rule requiring them to make non-negotiable commission offers to brokers to list their homes on MLS databases. A separate case involving similar charges and covering 14 states was also filed in Illinois.
NAR’s proposed settlement will resolve the Missouri and Illinois cases for all of those defendants — except for HomeServices of America, which is still litigating the Missouri judgement, Ketchmark said.
Wright said that NAR has worked hard for years to resolve the litigation “in a manner that benefits our members and American consumers.” The goal has been to preserve consumer choice and protect the group’s members to the greatest extent possible, she said, adding that the settlement achieves both of those goals.
The settlement is currently unavailable for the public to view but is expected to be filed next week. For more on the Missouri case, you can view the District Court for the Western District of Missouri Western Division filing here.
RELATED CONTENT
-
Stocks Rally as Investors Buy the Dip: Stock Market TodayMost sectors are "go" only a day after talk of bubbles, extended valuations and narrow breadth undermined any kind of exuberance.
-
Elon Musk's $1 Trillion Pay Package Vote: What's at Stake for Tesla StockTesla shareholders are voting this week on a massive pay package for CEO Elon Musk. Here's what it means for the Mag 7 stock.
-
How to Read a Company's Balance Sheet Like a Stock ProKnowing how to read this financial statement can help you separate strong companies from struggling ones.
-
How to Choose the Best Charities to Donate ToWhile you set your giving strategy, think about your values, and select organizations that will put your contributions to good use.
-
Four Military Benefits That Have Helped My FamilyMilitary life can be challenging for servicemembers and their families, but they're offered some significant financial benefits to help cushion the blow.
-
A Compelling Case for Why Property Investing Reigns Supreme, From a Real Estate Investing ProInvestment data show real estate's superior risk-adjusted returns and unprecedented tax advantages through strategies like 1031 exchanges and opportunity zones.
-
Why Now is the 'Just Right' Time to Do Those Home UpgradesInterest rates are dropping and tax credits are expiring, creating a short opportunity to save on home upgrades.
-
Selling a Haunted House? What You Have to Tell Buyers (and What You Don’t)You don’t need ghosts to spook buyers, sometimes a home’s past is enough. Here’s what sellers should know about disclosure laws, pricing and perception when a property has a haunted history.
-
New Opportunity Zone Rules Triple Tax Benefits for Rural Investments: Here's Your 2027 StrategyNew IRS guidance just reshaped the opportunity zone landscape for 2027. Here's what high-net-worth investors need to know about the enhanced rural benefits.
-
A Vacation Home Sounds Dreamy, But Is It the Right Move for You?A vacation home can be a relaxing getaway or a financial burden. Learn the pros and cons of owning a second home and how to decide if it fits your goals.
