Advertisement
Politics

Tax Hikes on the Rich: Will Dems Blink?

Don't rule out a one-year extension of all the Bush tax cuts -- even those for high incomers.

For more than two years, President Obama and the vast majority of Democrats have argued for extending and enlarging Bush’s middle class tax cuts while allowing rates to rise for those making more than $250,000 a year. Ask today, and that’s still the answer you get from every Democrat in a position of power. But as the Dec. 31 deadline approaches, don’t be surprised if Democrats cave and allow at least a one-year extension on all the Bush cuts.

Advertisement - Article continues below

This is one case where the parliamentary rules should give Democrats an advantage because if the Senate deadlocks and does nothing, all the tax rates would automatically rise for 2011 -- an outcome no one wants. That means Democrats could put a bill on the floor extending the lower rates just for middle incomers and dare the Republicans to block it. If Republicans do -- insisting they won’t vote for a bill that is a de facto rate hike on the rich -- Democrats would be able to go to the voters and blame the Republicans for a massive tax hike on the middle class.

The problem is that politically it probably won’t work. While Republicans have done everything they can to block every piece of Obama legislation over the past 18 months, independent voters still blame Democrats for the gridlock because Democrats are theoretically running the show. It may not be fair, but that’s the way it is, and Democrats aren’t likely to want to take a risk on the all important issue of taxes. Plus -- with the economy still shaky -- some Democrats worry about raising taxes even on the rich and prefer a delay.

Advertisement - Article continues below
Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

The irony gets even greater when you consider how much extending tax breaks on high incomes adds to the deficit -- about $55 billion in 2011. Republicans who have blocked all kinds of legislation (including $34 billion to extend aid to the unemployed) because it would add to the deficit think the offset rule shouldn’t apply to tax cuts. In fact, in an interview with Fox News, Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) claimed that tax cuts should never have to be paid for. Not every Republican agrees with that, and one wild card in the extension debate is Ohio Republican Sen. George Voinovich, who says he’ll try to block an extension of the Bush tax cuts if they’re not paid for. Voinovich can afford to stand on principle because he’s retiring rather than running for re-election.

Debates on taxes always bring out a number of anomalies. Everytime we discuss them, all sorts of misinformation surfaces in e-mails and comments, with most people thinking their taxes are even higher than they are. The biggest mistake -- people in the 25% marginal tax bracket think they pay 25% of their income to the IRS. In fact, most of their income is taxed at a far lower rate.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The Congressional Budget Office provided some clarity in a recent report analyzing what people actually paid in 2007, the last year for which data are available. The CBO combined income taxes, payroll taxes, unemployment and even corporate taxes, using a formula that assumes businesses pass those taxes on to individuals in higher prices and lower dividends. They didn’t include state taxes on income, sales and property, which tend to be less progressive.

The results:

• The lowest 20% of earners (those who made less than $20,500 in 2007) paid just 4% of their income in federal taxes.

• Those making $20,500-$34,299 paid 10.6%; those making $34,300-$49,999 paid 14.3% and those making $50,000-$74,699 paid 17.4%.

• The top 20% -- those making $74,700 or more in 2007 -- paid 25.1% of their income in federal taxes.

Income tax, by the way, is a relatively small portion of the total, especially at the low ends but even at the high ones. Federal income tax for the top 400 household incomes in 2007 averaged 16.6%.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Most Popular

What Trump's Payroll Tax Cut Will Mean for You
Tax Breaks

What Trump's Payroll Tax Cut Will Mean for You

President Trump issued an executive order to suspend the collection of Social Security payroll taxes. How much will it save you?
August 10, 2020
What a Payroll Tax Cut Would Mean for You
Tax Breaks

What a Payroll Tax Cut Would Mean for You

If Congress can't pass another stimulus bill, President Trump says he will initiate a payroll tax cut by executive order. How much would that save you…
August 8, 2020
Drawing Down Retirement Savings in a Pandemic
Coronavirus and Your Money

Drawing Down Retirement Savings in a Pandemic

Tapping the right accounts at the right time matters. Knowing how much a retiree can spend each year without running out of savings in old age is even…
August 7, 2020

Recommended

What Trump's Payroll Tax Cut Will Mean for You
Tax Breaks

What Trump's Payroll Tax Cut Will Mean for You

President Trump issued an executive order to suspend the collection of Social Security payroll taxes. How much will it save you?
August 10, 2020
Tax-Free Weekend Dates, States and Savings for Back-to-School Shopping
Tax Breaks

Tax-Free Weekend Dates, States and Savings for Back-to-School Shopping

Sales tax holidays are a great way to save money on clothes, shoes, backpacks, school supplies, and other back-to-school necessities.
August 4, 2020
Sales Tax Holidays in 2020
Tax Breaks

Sales Tax Holidays in 2020

Sixteen states are having sales tax holidays this year. If you plan your shopping around these tax-free periods, you can save big on back-to-school cl…
August 4, 2020
6 Money-Smart Ways to Spend Your Stimulus Check
Tax Breaks

6 Money-Smart Ways to Spend Your Stimulus Check

If you don't have to use your stimulus check for basic necessities, consider putting the money to work for you. You'll thank yourself later.
July 30, 2020